That's pretty disappointing. But I can one up you there. There's a guy I know who loves AI and has published a book on Amazon that AI wrote for him which he says has earned him a small amount of money (like a few dollars here and there). Then someone asked him if he'd read the book himself and of course I assumed he must have. The answer was no... he has not.
It makes sense alright. But who was the “author” assuming would read the book if he himself wasn’t bothered to read it? An AI book that no one has read serves no purpose.
You know it's filled with glaring errors. I've listened to too many AI stories, and names can change, new characters added at random, entire relationship swaps, and that's before you get to plot holes, contrived situations that could be solved with one discussion, irrational decisions, etc.
96
u/dog_cow 21h ago
That's pretty disappointing. But I can one up you there. There's a guy I know who loves AI and has published a book on Amazon that AI wrote for him which he says has earned him a small amount of money (like a few dollars here and there). Then someone asked him if he'd read the book himself and of course I assumed he must have. The answer was no... he has not.