r/BadReads 14d ago

Reddit Call from inside the sub

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

678 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/Helpfulcloning 14d ago

Even the first chapter it should be very easy to realise he has (at best) a skewed sense of reality or is lying. He claims a toddler is seducing him on purpose because her ball rolls under his bench. He says he can be mistaken for a moviestar but a few pages later describes himself as having a crooked nose, a lisp, a hunched back, etc.

21

u/EldritchTouched 14d ago

He also opens with mentioning "ladies and gentlemen of the jury" on the first page and frames the thing as a trial.

3

u/Rate_Ur_Smile 11d ago

As the foreword explains, Humbert Humbert was awaiting trial (having killed the man who got Dolores pregnant) when he wrote the text, and was intending to present it in his defense.

3

u/EldritchTouched 11d ago

Also true.

I should note my mention is due to the weird trend that certain sorts (a group I suspect are likely to interpret Lolita as a "pro paedo" book) skip things like forewords, prologues, and epilogues entirely. Even if they did ignore that, this shit's also on page one of chapter one.

5

u/EruditeKetchup 14d ago

What movie star? Quasimodo?