Source: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/1526836 (Perhaps she’s friendly?)

Source: https://x.com/komaco_pokee1/status/2092962836729172442?s=46&t=EaGBlq6YKYmDEqS2VD-cbg

Ralts is the first stage of a three-stage evolution line, has really low base stats, and even looks somewhat like a toddler. Wouldn’t it make sense for it to be classified as a Baby Pokémon, similar to Tyrogue or Smoochum?

Even Kirlia wouldn’t feel out of place as the “basic” Pokémon you encounter in the wild. Its stats are comparable to several early-game Pokémon you can catch in Emerald, so Ralts almost feels like it could have been the baby form added underneath it.

Source: https://x.com/darkyart/status/2091239073117540460?s=46&t=EaGBlq6YKYmDEqS2VD-cbg

Decided to make another cute Lucia artwork ;)

I would name her “ruby”. Like how her eyes are the same color as rubies

Source: https://x.com/dolly_soramimi_/status/2092554502587163107

By @hanahanac5jv Twitter https://x.com/hanahanac5vj/status/2092727009738981387

Source: https://x.com/o_san0033/status/2092540145195159876?s=46&t=EaGBlq6YKYmDEqS2VD-cbg

https://x.com/R_a_ine/status/2091451768584740927

I started playing Ruby in 2002 and had a random thought: what if the Pokémon aged in real time?
I started with Mudkip and caught Poochyena, Zigzagoon, Wurmple, Ralts and Swellow pretty early on.

Using the lifespan of each Pokémon’s closest real-world equivalent, which of them could realistically still be alive 24 years later? Would my Ralts, now Gardevoir, be the last one standing?

Aren't they adorable?

Got these, and a mega Gallade for £12.50 (~$17)

You're messed up