Under the Leadership of Prime Minister Mark Carney, liberals are able to successfully navigate and secure international opportunities despite the hardships faced by the United States. Mark Carney likes to see Canada compete in the 2027 song contest in Europe. Mark Carney either is bringing business back home or helping talented Canadians seen on international competitions by opening doors to Canadians.

Pathways into a nation and immigration overall has become a very heated discussion topic in the last few years.

Here in Canada we have started to see reductions in various pathways into the nation and immigration overall.

We still though have a lot of openings for bad actors to take advantage of.

Bad actors such as slum lords, diploma mill operators, bad employers, bad immigration consultants, and the like.

There have been some posts/comments on Reddit and other online spaces along with general news stories from those that work in these governmental offices that there isn't enough burden of "proof/need" put on the employers, immigration consultants, and the like.

That investigative teams are short-staffed and the budgets are lacking for robust work to be done in this area.

Obviously with reducing the amount of people coming in those problems & abuses become less in scale but the problems with the general frameworks are still there.

Summed Up: Do you think we will see Carney/LPC do the hard work that is needed to re-write our immigration system so that abuse of the system and exploitation of workers is no longer an inherent flaw in the system?

What do you think would help with this process for policy changes?

Eby and Carney bailing condos

The Liberal Party of Canada today just did a big announcement around Nuclear Power - In particular around our very own CANDU reactors.

For those of us that are technical junkies here is the in-depth details available to the public at this time: https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-sources/nuclear-energy-uranium/nuclear-energy-strategy-canada

What I would really like to see is some way to encourage Solar Power, Wind Power, & Battery Technology - Especially in Saskatchewan & Alberta.

Saskatchewan & Alberta are two of the best places in all of Canada for Solar Power, Wind Power, & Grid Storage.

Alberta was actually leading in Renewable Energy before Danielle Smith/UCP decided to put some serious roadblocks.

Now unfortunately billions of Renewable Energy projects have been halted and died on the vine.

It would have been nice to have that clean affordable energy, jobs, and so on... Especially with Alberta having such high power prices.

Also Saskatchewan unfortunately still relies on a lot of coal power plants.

*Sadly these two places also have a lot of Fossil Fuel Industry lobbying so it makes change/transition tougher. Also when it comes to Housing Policy, Labour Policy, and Energy Policy the real powerhouse isn't national level politics but provincial. So public awareness, education, and activism has to start there.*

Anyway! When it comes to the LPC "Nuclear Energy Strategy for Canada" how are you feeling?

It is good to grow our own food in Canada rather than relying on imports to stabilize the food prices. A greenhouse is also a good way to grow food in Canada. It is helpful if farmers can get funding to start a greenhouse in Canada.

Hey Liberals! We started a new subreddit, r/CanadianEditorial as a place for people to share the long form ideas and discussions that don't make it up to r/Canada for whatever reason. Check it out! If you do, please be nice to anyone who disagrees with you politically.

Looking to increase submissions etc, so if you've got excellent pro-Liberal, smaller market sources, those would be a great thing to add there.

Cheers!

LNG projects from private investment from Germany and partnerships with Indigenous communities are an excellent source of revenue for the government. If the Liberal government wants to support major social programs like health care, dental care, and child care, it needs more revenue-generating projects. I like the Liberal government led by Mark Carney because its strategy is to make money to support our social programs and balance the budget.

Apprenticeship programs in skilled trades are good for promoting the home-building industry in Canada. It is a good way for young people to gain employment. It is, however, still a male-dominated industry. It is important to create work opportunities for young women as well.

When has it been appropriate or professional for a morning show to discuss politics so one sided giving their personal views? This morning N and D were discussing 🤡 as if he was the best thing to happen to Canada. I have previously heard Nat discussing her personal political beliefs on air that are very controversial, I just keep giving them the “one off” but it has become a regular part of the show.

Are they not obligated to be unbiased?

I have turned 103.5 off at our house permanently after years of listening because of the hosts “opinion pushing” over air.

When Donald Trump stated that Canada is the 51st state and Alberta's separation is not right, Alberta disagreed with Justin Trudeau's green initiatives. However, Mark Carney supports both conventional and clean energy. While the past cannot be changed, we have control over our future. Alberta has a bright future within Canada. This is the time to work together for all.

Charlie Kirk, a close personal friend and political ally of the man who's been blackmailing our economy and threatening our sovereignty, spent a significant amount of time platforming people who supported the US annexation of Canada and US-sponsored Alberta separatists, and the Conservatives responded to his death by celebrating the man's life and ignoring both his blatant disregard for our sovereignty, his racism (most notably against black women), and his extremist positions with respect to the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the basic humanity of gay and transgender people.

No link, because I assume nobody here wants to drive traffic to seditious rags like the Western Standard.