Really just asking for general opinion. Typically I shoot the 72/90/150 combo on 4x5 and 5x7. However, I have a project of shooting the mountains around me (as one may have seen in the Home Mountains series I posted recently). These should showcase the mountain itself. What I have found is that I am not able to get near enough in order to fill the frame with said mountain as much as I would like. I know cropping is an option but ideally not. These images will be viewed both close up and at mid distance (I guess about 3-5 at most) in hotel lobbies etc.
After doing the calculations in order to shoot these mountains from the other side of the valley I think I would need something in the aforementioned focal range.
Considerations:
Camera - intrepid 5x7 with reducing 4x5 back
Filters - use of red and cpl in the 'adams/butcher style'
Film - Ilford FP4
Darkroom printed prints of 50x70 on Ilford Fibre Gloss
Mounted and framed behind museum glass
Weight - Im fit and dont really mind carrying extra weight for this project.
Lenses I have considered:
Schneider G - Claron 305/355 - this would be ideal as they are extremely light. But honestly I cant find one for under about 900 euros which I find excessive for an enlarger lens.
Symmar S and Rodenstock equivelant 300/360 - I love these lenses and already own and mainly shoot the 150 as my 'everyday carry' lens. People complain about the weight, but they dont seem too bad? Would the intrepid support either of these if they are indeed so heavy?
Schneider tele arton 360 - found one very affordable and i think these lenses seem like a good bet, cant find many if any examples online but reads well - would love some feedback on this lens is anyone has actually used it. Also apparently quite heavy but apparently should work on the intrepid.
Are there any Rodenstock/Schneider lenses I should consider? Id prefer to stick with these brands and not venture into the Fuji world for reasons I cant be bothered explaining here.
Anything else I am missing?
Thanks in advance for any help!