r/PoursTea 10d ago

PoliticalTea šŸ—³ļø Did Carl Sagan Call It or What?

Post image

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

44.5k Upvotes

805 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/lcm-hcf-maths 10d ago

I'd suggest that the uneducated part is far higher than 1/3....The top 30% of Americans are quite well educated but below that it goes off a cliff...and that's by design..

-2

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[deleted]

5

u/Noobtber 9d ago

First of all, this is from 2014. Whole different political landscape.

Second, if they test higher, why are they so goddamn stupid?

-14

u/just2saythisonhere 10d ago

So are you saying that being educated makes you more important and better than those not educated? Educated or not everyone deserves a voice and opinion.

12

u/festivefrederick 10d ago

It doesn’t take a bunch of upper level academics to know the difference between right and wrong. I’m not a scientist but I trust real science.

-10

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

If you aren't educated in it how do you know it's "real science"? Hell most of the Democratic base literally can't objectively define a female vs male. They define it purely based on feelings and opinions. So the idea of "educated" is purely subjective.

9

u/Sea_School_2949 9d ago

If it follows the scientific method then it can be independently verified by anyone then that is science

-2

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

Just because it follows the scientific method doesn't mean the results are 100% accurate.

5

u/Sea_School_2949 9d ago

If the results can be replicated following the method recorded that's science

It's also funny because Carl Sagan also talks about your type in this book the so-called arm chair skeptics. Where in reality you are just acting in bad faith.

Carl Sagan specifically says that these "skeptics" are interesting because they make it a whole conspiracy that scientists are hiding behind these huge lies to convince the public.

When in reality good science is inherently anti-authority as it does not care that someone says this happens when you do that

A good scientist goes and does the thing and then from that we are able to start forming a good theory on why the thing happens

What you're imply simply doesn't happen when you follow the method

7

u/festivefrederick 9d ago

Incorrect.

5

u/Electric_Antimony 9d ago

Imagine caring about the trans culture war that affects almost no one when there are real issues like insane corruption and crime in the highest levels of government; immense waste, fraud, and abuse of republicans; a republican protected pedo ring; climate change; another republican Forever War in the Middle East; AI and data centers; massive transfers of wealth from the poor to the rich; a surveillance state; and an claimed democracy being exposed as an oligarchy.

1

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

2

u/Electric_Antimony 9d ago

So pedophilia is good now because the orange goose and his fellow republican geese do it?

If that saying were to be applied to republicans, it would mean crime and corruption are good to do now. It means war is good now.

I agree that trump and republicans should be judged the same way Biden and the Democrats were and are. Oh boy they would cry so hard at actual rules being applied lmao.

They can't even handle We the People voting them out of office.

0

u/LaffingAtYuo 9d ago

I can simultaneously care about all these (the ones that are true). You can only pick and choose?

4

u/Electric_Antimony 9d ago

As long as you keep them in the proper order that's fine, but caring about trans stuff is just pointless when all the other facts I just listed are actually important issues that could break the country.

-1

u/LaffingAtYuo 9d ago

Sounds like you're swallowing the same pill, recycling fringe Republican "pizzagate" type theories. Strange as there's so much actual fodder here, why invent stuff?

4

u/Electric_Antimony 9d ago edited 9d ago

Notice that as is typical for people running your routine, you never actually refute a single fact, because they are in fact facts and not made up, so you can't.

All you can do is go "nuh uh you're crazy" as if that means anything to normal people.

Crazy that you're fully taken by the trans hysteria and you say others are swallowing pills. Look in the mirror.

Edit: People, notice yet again that he can't actually address the actual things I stated, so he has to twist it into something I didn't say.

A republican protected pedo ring is what I said, not a republican crime ring against children.

I'm beyond tired of these losers, can we please deport them all to CECOT and be done with it?

0

u/LaffingAtYuo 9d ago

How can I disprove there's not a Republican crime ring against children? I suppose I can't, you've got me...

3

u/Prestigious_Cycle160 9d ago

So… SCIENCE is actually what gives them the ā€œgenderā€ argument. You realize that there are more than 2 genders right? Like it’s a scientific fact.

1

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

Xy, xx genetically speaking (which is a recognized science) how are there more than 2?

3

u/Prestigious_Cycle160 9d ago

How many more variations can you make with those letters?

3

u/Strider-Juice 9d ago

Klinefelter’s syndrome, turner syndrome, androgen insensitivity syndrome, XX male syndrome, swyer syndrome. Speaking as someone in the medical industry, you’ve displayed next to no real knowledge about the topic.

Epigenetic regulation, hormonal disruption, atypical differentiation of neuronal networks during development, all of these factors go into the regulation and perception of phenotypic sex as well as the eventual development of gender perception. Boiling things down to chromosomal differences is reductive because biology is COMPLICATED. You have over 25,000 genes that can be transcriptionally expressed completely differently. The TTN gene alone is often spliced into upwards of 100 different functional transcripts for unique proteins within the human body.

This is why education matters, because not every person can be knowledgeable on every subject. I’m an expert in biology because I’ve studied it all my life and I’m still learning more every day. When you stop listening to experts, problems become simplified to the point of nonsense because of a lack of real information and all nuance is lost.

3

u/festivefrederick 9d ago

It’s all out there in the open waiting for and people like you to find out.

6

u/BigSugar27 9d ago

Better? No. More Important? Depends on what they went to school for. Stuff like trade schools and going to college to become doctors and teachers just to name a few important careers that immediately come to mind yes I would say that makes someone more important

-5

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

So then in your opinion should someone who didn't go to school and has no formal education not have a say in policy?

6

u/Sea_School_2949 9d ago

They didn't say that

4

u/RedEyeView 9d ago

No. Because they don't have a clue what they're talking about.

0

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

So then someone who isn't an expert on firearms shouldn't have a say when it comes to laws about firearms.

3

u/SaltMage5864 9d ago

Why do you think your willful ignorance should have the same consideration as reality son?

-1

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

Explain that to the 25-37 million people of the US that doesn't have a highschool education.

3

u/Lunes_Feet_Pictos 9d ago

Correct. People should not guide civilization if they don't know what they're doing.

0

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

So those that are privileged with the ability to attend college should be the only people who get any say in policy?

2

u/Lunes_Feet_Pictos 9d ago

Those who are educated are the only ones who should be deciding the future of our species, yes.

3

u/Sarcasm_As_A_Service 9d ago

The problem is you people think a maga high school dropout has an equally qualified opinion as a professional in their field.

1

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

Or a drop out that solely votes Democrat has the same opinion. It goes both ways. Drop outs aren't solely a right leaning group. Arguably the left has more drop outs.

3

u/Sarcasm_As_A_Service 9d ago

Only the conservatives are against education. Thats how you conserve something. You keep people from learning new ways.

It’s not hard to find statistics on education levels and how those people vote.

ā€œVoters with postgraduate degrees are substantially more Democratic than those with four-year degreesā€

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/pp_2024-4-9_partisan-coalitions_2-03-png/

3

u/SaltMage5864 9d ago

No son, you definitely do not deserve to have anyone waste their time listening to your ignorance

0

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

Ok so then tell that to the 10-12% of blacks that don't matter in your opinion.

2

u/Lunes_Feet_Pictos 9d ago

Oh my God yes. So much yes. Undeucated people are sheep for pedophiles to manipulate they deserve nothing

1

u/just2saythisonhere 9d ago

So then uneducated people on guns should have absolutely zero say on gun policy.

2

u/Lunes_Feet_Pictos 9d ago

Policy experts should be deciding on those policies, correct.

-6

u/Longjumping-Ad-9444 10d ago

Feelings not facts