PETITION FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND STANDARD CROSSWALK MARKINGS
Town of Basalt, Colorado
To: Gloria Kaasch-Buerger, Town Manager, Town of Basalt
Cc: Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Region 3 Traffic & Safety
Request for Safety Action
We, the concerned residents, property owners, community members, and users of Basalt’s roadways and pedestrian crossings, respectfully request that the Town of Basalt promptly review and correct the multi-colored crosswalks located at:
- Lewis Lane / Willits Road
- Two Rivers Road / Cottonwood Drive
These are heavily used pedestrian crossings serving residents, families, children, runners, cyclists, schools, parks, businesses, and visitors. At both locations, significant pedestrian activity intersects with moving vehicle traffic, making visibility, consistency, and immediate driver recognition critical to public safety.
A crosswalk should be immediately recognizable to every driver, in all conditions. The current multi-colored pavement treatments do not provide the same familiar and standardized visual cue as conventional white crosswalk markings. Visibility is of particular concern at night and during wet or overcast conditions.
Safety Risks of Multi-Colored Crosswalks
The concern with multi-colored or artistic crosswalks is not simply their appearance. Crosswalks are traffic-safety environments where drivers and pedestrians must recognize and react to one another quickly and predictably. Potential risks include:
- Reduced nighttime visibility – Multiple colors become significantly less distinct after dark, while standardized reflective pavement markings are designed around visibility and recognition. The lack of nighttime visibility is a concern.
- Reduced visibility when wet or during poor weather – Rain, wet pavement, glare, snow, and overcast conditions can further reduce the contrast between colored pavement and the roadway.
- Reduced contrast of the actual crosswalk markings – Bright colors and patterns can visually compete with or diminish the contrast of the white markings that identify the crosswalk. FHWA has specifically warned against colored treatments that degrade this contrast.
- Driver confusion and delayed recognition – Drivers are trained and conditioned to recognize standardized white reflective pavement markings. An unusual combination of colors and patterns may require additional visual processing before a driver recognizes the area as a pedestrian crossing. FHWA emphasizes uniformity and warns against treatments that might be mistaken for traffic-control applications.
- Potential distraction to drivers – Bright, unusual or artistic pavement treatments can draw a driver's attention toward the pavement itself rather than toward pedestrians, vehicles and other hazards. FHWA previously concluded that certain bright, distinctive crosswalk patterns have the potential to distract road users and reduce safety.
- Children may view the crosswalk as a place to play or interact – A colorful or artistic design can make the roadway appear more like a play area, public-art installation, or pedestrian space rather than an area that should be crossed promptly. Importantly, the current MUTCD specifically states that aesthetic crosswalk patterns shall not be designed to encourage road users to remain in the crosswalk, engage or interact with the pattern, or otherwise inhibit safe and efficient crossing.
- Potential false sense of security for pedestrians – A visually prominent artistic crossing may cause pedestrians to perceive the crossing as especially protected or safer than it actually is. FHWA has previously cautioned that crosswalk art could contribute to a false sense of security for both motorists and pedestrians.
- Difficulty for colorblind drivers – Reliance on multiple colors can reduce the effectiveness of the visual treatment for people who have difficulty distinguishing certain colors. Drivers that suffer from colorblindness are significant disadvantaged and unable to see the crosswalk when painted in color.
- Confusion with established roadway colors – Roadway colors have standardized meanings. Introducing multiple colors into the traveled way can create unnecessary ambiguity or resemble other traffic-control applications. FHWA specifically restricts aesthetic treatments from using colors that fall within standardized traffic-control color ranges.
- Possible traction concerns – Depending on the paint or surface-treatment material used, pavement treatments can affect traction, particularly when wet. If the paint used is not approved as a MUTCD paint, it poses a significant risk to braking action and skidding, especially during an emergency stopping situation. The current MUTCD advises that surface-treatment materials should be selected to minimize loss of traction and confirm with required preapproved materials.
- Loss of uniformity and predictability – A fundamental safety benefit of standardized traffic-control devices is that motorists can recognize them quickly regardless of where they are driving. Nonstandard treatments introduce another visual condition for drivers to interpret.
- No demonstrated safety benefit from decorative coloration itself – FHWA's prior reviews of aesthetic colored crosswalk treatments found no discernible improvement in pedestrian safety or crash reduction attributable to the decorative treatment.
- The Federal Highway Administration’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), adopted in Colorado together with the Colorado Supplement, establishes uniform standards for traffic-control devices. MUTCD Part 3, Section 3C.03 states that “Crosswalk markings shall be white.”
- FHWA guidance further addresses decorative pavement and provides that decorative treatments must not replace or diminish required white crosswalk markings.
Community Request
We respectfully petition the Town of Basalt, in consultation with CDOT, to:
Promptly review both multi-colored crosswalks for safety and compliance with applicable traffic-control standards.
Restore the crossings to standard, high-visibility standard white crosswalk markings consistent with applicable MUTCD and Colorado standards.
Prioritize pedestrian safety, visibility, and immediate driver recognition over decorative pavement treatments within these crossings.
This petition is solely about pedestrian safety. Standardized traffic-control markings exist so motorists can recognize and respond to them immediately. At heavily used crossings—particularly those serving children and families—even a brief delay in recognition can have serious consequences.
We urge the Town to take this simple, proactive safety measure before a serious pedestrian incident occurs.
Respectfully submitted by the concerned community members of Basalt, Colorado.