Iām honestly so fucking sick of the way the Malinauskas government is treating the Adelaide Park Lands like theyāre just vacant land waiting to be monetised.
I live right next to the Park Lands and have done so for the last 15 years. And before anyone says āwell you chose to live thereā - yes I did. I knew the Adelaide 500 (or Clipsal as it was back then) happened once a year and I accepted that.
What I didnāt sign up for was the government continually expanding motorsport and shutting down public roads and Park Lands for longer and longer periods. During the Adelaide 500 road closures my normal 20 minute drive to work can take almost 1.5 hours. Thatās not a minor inconvenience. Then thereās the constant noise (the army planes ffs), traffic, disruption, fencing, construction and everything else that comes with it. God forbid you are a shift worker, and what was now 1 weekend a year of NO REST because of the noise, may become weeks? A month? It is so insanely disruptive to day to day life in every way possible.
Donāt even get me started on being a woman walking through the park lands with the construction workers present for weeks and all the drunk event goers.
And now apparently we need motorcycle racing as well, with roads potentially closed for even longer? How much is enough?
These are the Adelaide park lands. Theyāre heritage listed and theyāre not there for Peter Malinauskasās personal events venue to keep carving up every time someone waves a dollar sign in front of the government. It fucking pisses me off. It feels like every decision about the Park Lands is justified with ābut think of the economic benefitā, as though making money automatically overrides everything else.
What about the people who fucking live here? What about noise? Traffic? Wildlife? Trees and the environment? Access to public land? The heritage value of the Park Lands? Or do none of those things matter as long as we can announce another shiny āworld-class eventā and slap a dollar figure on the supposed economic benefit?
I'm not anti-motorsport. The residents tolerate the Adelaide 500 every year because it's an established event and I understand that major events are good for Adelaide.
But there has to be a line; once we decide heritage-listed Park Lands can be increasingly developed, fenced off and disrupted for commercial events, where exactly does it stop?
This government seems absolutely obsessed with major projects and events, and I wish there was even half as much enthusiasm for protecting the things Adelaide already has. The park lands are one of the best things about this city. Once they're chipped away at, we don't magically get them back. Maybe instead of constantly asking āhow much money will this bring in?ā the government could occasionally ask āshould we actually fucking do this?ā. Everyday on my way to work I almost want to cry thinking of how the area will be decimated for greed. Itās not just the Moto GP, but the residents have already been protesting against the development plans of 8,10,12 story buildings in an area mostly composing of single and double story homes. A recent development that went up looks directly into my bathroom and blocks all sunlight from the house. Lucy hood was helpful in helping us protest against it, but after all that itās still going ahead.
Interested to know if I'm alone here because the whole thing is starting to make me ANGRY everyday!!!
Edit because people are missing the point entirely:
This isn't "I live near the city therefore nothing inconvenient should ever happen near me." I already said I accept the Adelaide 500 and have lived with it for 15 years. I used my experience because it's the impact I personally see, not because I think the park lands belong to the people who live next to them. My actual concern is the precedent we're setting for the park lands.
They belong to all of Adelaide. They're public green space that people can use every day without buying a ticket or spending a dollar. A āthird spaceā if you will. I don't think "this event will generate X million dollars" should automatically trump every other consideration about how that land is used.
I'm also not arguing Adelaide should never host major events. Of course it should. I'm asking where the line is.
If we accept increasingly long closures, permanent infrastructure, removal of vegetation, fencing and commercial occupation of park lands because each individual proposal has an economic benefit, at what point are we allowed to say the cumulative impact has gone too far?
Calling anyone who questions that a NIMBY basically avoids the question.
You can support development, tourism and major events while also believing some things are worth protecting from commercialisation. Those aren't contradictory positions.
And ironically, the argument that I'm somehow trying to keep the Park Lands for people wealthy enough to live nearby is the exact opposite of what I'm saying. They're valuable precisely because you DON'T need to own property nearby, buy a ticket or spend money to use them.
That's the point I was trying to make.