r/StarWarsCantina • u/Lucas_Sequels_OCD • 8h ago
Skywalker Saga Rey was probably a Nobody is George Lucas' Sequel trilogy too.
There's a lot of debate on what should've happened in the sequels, specifically with who Rey should've been—a Nobody, a Skywalker/Solo, a Kenobi, or something consistent from the get-go—but I always go back to thinking about what the Creator's original intent was for the character.
A lot has come out about his trilogy, mainly just the larger broad strokes of the galaxy with the politics and cosmology, but specifically the statement: “I imagined the saga to be about the father, the son, and the grandchildren.” This seems to narrow it down a lot when trying to figure out who Rey was in Lucas' original drafts. From the start, Han and Leia’s son would be in the mix as a young Jedi who is seduced to the dark side, with that character evolving/splitting into both Finn and Kylo Ren. With Rey, the most logical assumption is that she is Han and Leia’s daughter. Between multiple references to the offspring being compared to Jaina and Jacen, and Lucas stating that Luke would not be married or have kids, this narrows down the trajectory.
But I keep coming back to another cool possibility that may be controversial (read the title again for a guess). Despite being critiqued for having no overarching plan for the trilogy, it's been a very consistent attribute for Rey to be an unrelated nobody who functions as this story’s Skywalker. Before Rian Johnson had Rey declare herself a nobody in TLJ, Abrams was also attached to the idea of Rey as a nobody to evoke the same starting point as Luke from the original trilogy. With that, he basically sets up that same reveal in TLJ, with Maz Kanata’s quote, “The belonging you seek is not behind you, it is ahead,” laying out a found-family trajectory for the character. Before J.J. came back to the project to do a course correction in TROS, Colin Trevorrow carried on this same message in his version of Episode IX: *Duel of the Fates*. To quote Pablo Hidalgo from a 2014 entry in *The Art of The Rise of Skywalker* book: “She's our Skywalker, but not actually a Skywalker. That way, the term Skywalker is more like a metaphor.”
I'd partially accept the idea that this was a direction driven by the new creatives and executives as a marketing gimmick that fit their agenda. But then I return to Michael Arndt, George Lucas' chosen screenwriter for Episode VII. He wanted Rey (originally called Taryn, then Thea) to be the most isolated and disenfranchised character so she would have the most character growth and the greatest journey across the films. From day one, it seemed like they wanted the lead of the film to be a nobody, despite the claims Lucas made regarding the trilogy being about the grandchildren.
Then I started thinking about it the other way around: maybe this *was* the intent. I mean, Kylo already fulfills the grandchild character type, but it is stated multiple times as "grandchild**ren**," implying multiple offspring. But again, one of the two new characters designed as the main protagonists for the films is unrelated to Anakin, seemingly from day one. If not Han and Leia’s daughter, I think Rey was always supposed to be an unrelated nobody effectively adopted into the Skywalker family, being the last one to carry on the legacy of both the family and the Jedi. I think it fits with George Lucas' mythological motifs, I think it reflects the sort of era Lucas was developing for the sequels, and I think his real life acts as an inspiration for this as well.
It's well known that Luke Skywalker is, for the most part, directly based on George Lucas himself—like his OC, basically. The story has worked as a way to portray Lucas' worldview and upbringing, and also as a way to meditate on his life choices and theoretically his divorce. If Luke is a somewhat direct correlation to Lucas, then the children of the new trilogy could reflect his actual real-world children, who happen to be adopted. George Lucas has children, all of whom are adopted. With that, I think it's reasonable to assume his comfort with exploring the themes of found family in the saga. Rey could've started out as an orphan who, in seeking out Luke and training to be a Jedi under his and Leia's tutelage, finds a new family and becomes an honorary, adopted Skywalker.
This idea of passing on the family name to an unrelated mentee is not a new idea for Star Wars—or at least, it almost wasn't. For Episode I, before Qui-Gon was the mentor to a young Obi-Wan, it was the other way around. Obi-Wan was the old mentor with Qui-Gon as the Padawan. When they duel Maul and the mentor figure is mortally wounded, Qui-Gon takes on his master's name to carry on his legacy, becoming Obi-Wan Kenobi. With Lucas having a tendency to reuse old ideas, I think it's somewhat likely he would repeat this setup in his sequels with an orphan scavenger seeking to become a Jedi.
On top of that, the mythic motifs are already there. The films take a lot of cues from ancient myth, as per *The Hero with a Thousand Faces*: Heracles, Oedipus, Taoism, Buddhism, Angels and Devils, and most notably, Arthurian myth. Luke as King Arthur, Han as Lancelot, Leia as Guinevere. The sequels carry on this translation almost to a T: Kylo Ren as Mordred, and Luke as this reclusive Fisher King archetype in self-imposed exile. According to Lucas' original plans, he would've had Darth Talon as a primary antagonist responsible for seducing Han and Leia’s son to the dark side, thus fulfilling the Morgan le Fay role.
If this trilogy was meant to follow the story of Arthur's return to confront his nephew, it makes sense to also have Rey as the primary protagonist fulfilling the Percival figure. A lower-class, unrelated knight of Arthur's Round Table is the one to find the Grail and return it to Luke to heal the land.
And if we want to go into theoretical territory, we can see how Rey as this nobody figure works well within the post-Iraq War-inspired setting Lucas intended for the sequels. I can see how being an orphan displaced by the previous conflict reflects the era in the same way Luke was an isolated farm boy during the reign of the Empire, or Anakin a slave during the waning days of the Republic. To me, if not an updated version of Jaina Solo, I think George Lucas would've had Rey be a nobody anyway. Done right, I think it would've been a perfect narrative cap to the story.