r/IBO • u/GetAnAinTOK • 9h ago
ToK/EE My instant reaction thoughts to the May 27 TOK Essay titles
Hey guys! I'm the guy from Get an A in TOK - I'm working on my script for the breakdown video, but I figured I'd share my stream of consciousness thoughts on the titles before you get super stressed!
The Tldr is that these may be collectively the easiest TOK Essay titles ever.
Title 1: Do we gain a better appreciation of the human experience from the artist or the historian? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.
This is one of the most subjective TOK essay title’s I’ve ever seen. The most essential thing to do in this title is to be hyper-specific on what “better appreciation” actually means. A lot of students are going to write really general, personal, and subjective essays because they write about their own appreciation and assume that everyone else will agree with them.
** **
Title #2: If values change over time, how can they, nevertheless, continue to guide the pursuit of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
This one really surprised me because, while values are a standard TOK term and concept, they’re not often focused on. Usually we write about ethics and morals, not values. Because of that, you’ll want to differentiate between these three briefly, and then also approach it in a way that you couldn’t if you were focused on ethics and morals.
** **
Title #3: In the production of knowledge, how can knowledge be reliable if it is built on assumptions? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
I absolutely love this title, and it’s one of the things that I bring up (in reference to maths) when I’m trying to confuse people about what TOK is. The natural direction here, and the one that examiners will tacitly expect, is to talk about the mathematical axioms. Those are the real things that inspire a title like this – so absolutely write about those, but also remember that just mentioning and identifying them does not make you unique. It makes you ready and prepared to write something unique.
** **
Title #4: To what extent do you agree with the claim that "any coincidence is worth noticing; you can throw it away later if it is only a coincidence" (Agatha Christie). Answer with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
I love titles that use a quote from one AOK and then use it in another. Christie’s quote is talking about art, but you’re asked to write about maths and one other AOK. The main approach here is to figure out what makes something worth noticing, and then contrasting that with what makes something worth keeping (I’m assuming that would be what makes something knowledge, right?!). Thinking about AOK experts agreeing on something and that making it knowledge is what I’m feeling (right now) may be the best approach. What makes something considered knowledge?
** **
Title #5: In the production of knowledge, when choosing one explanation over another, to what extent should simplicity be prioritized? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
I’m not sure how popular this one will be, because some of the others…cough…TITLE #1…are so easy, but this one is going to have so many potential examples that I could see many students choosing this one. This title is asking you to make a values-based judgement, the extent to which simplicity should be prioritized, but it’s important to make this judgement at the end, after looking at many times in which experts did so. This title gives a great opportunity to make a clear decision – avoid middle-of-the-road answers here, especially in the conclusion!
** **
Title #6: In the pursuit of knowledge, what value is there in exploring the paradoxical or the counterintuitive? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.
** **
This is such a strange title because it’s so vague and open ended. There are also so many potential topics, ideas, and examples that can be used for this. That also makes it hard: when something is so broad, we can spend more time researching than we really need to. It’s nice to be given the natural sciences, which helps us to narrow it down a bit, but other than that, every AOK works, and virtually anything in the Arts (which is always the most used AOK) can work. Don’t fall into analysis paralysis here when figuring out your approach.