r/InRangeTV 14d ago

M1 > M1A, specially when "compliant".

26 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

10

u/JustSomeGuyMedia 14d ago

Not when mounting of optics/accessories is considered, imo. The garand really hamstrings you on the former and the M1A has more options for the latter. A bit easier to get short M1As too.

6

u/Jo-6-pak 14d ago

I have a busted-up right thumb and struggle with loading clips, so maybe I’m a special case; but I’ll go with the mag changes on an M1A.

5

u/TimothySouthland 14d ago

You got a video on this comparison. Haven’t shot either but I’d love to hear about it.

6

u/SU37Yellow 14d ago

Hmm, I think you probably could keep up a higher overall rate of fire with an M1 rather then an M14. You could get the first 20 off faster with the M14, but after that you're playing catch up to the Garand. Mag changes on the M14 are a bitch, it doesn't matter how good you are with it, it'll still be slow.

9

u/AscendantJustice 14d ago

The hypothetical is with a compliant 10 round magazine.

7

u/SU37Yellow 14d ago

With 10 rounders, an M1 is unquestionably faster then, which further reinforces my point that an M1 might be faster then a M14 with 20 rounder

-2

u/AscendantJustice 14d ago

Your point is moot because that was the topic of discussion.

2

u/Misbegotten_Martian 14d ago

"Compliant" also isn't legal nationwide since some places ban the M1A no matter what

2

u/frenzyfivefour 13d ago

Basically, and anywhere a m1a is compliant a mini-14 should be as well, or some variant of a bufferless ar with a shotgun stock if not a grip fin conventional ar.

2

u/jombojuice2018 14d ago

The reloads aren’t that bad, just takes some practice with the 20s. Plus you’re doing less of them.

2

u/Jimboslice1998 14d ago

I don’t know if I agree with mag changes being all that difficult in normal circumstances. 10 round mags are gonna be quite goofy and slower than an m1, but the 20 round mags aren’t that tricky on the m14.