r/Insurance 1d ago

Auto Insurance Diminished value claim denied

Location: California

Edit: It was against the at fault party insurer, not my own.

Car is Subaru impreza 2023 model, accident date: Nov 2023 milage: 6K at the time of accident.

Carfax consider minor damage(rear bumper+ other parts replaced). Reapirs costed 5K

Original post:

By taking advice from all reddit buddies, I filed Diminished value claim for a 2.5 year old claim. It got denied.

What should be the next steps? Chat-GPT says that the case cited aas for first party claims, so reply accordingly, also hire a DV appraiser report.

Excerpt from letter:

"please be advised that Califormia Law does not require insurance companies to provide coverage for diminution in value. Per Carson v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 409, in which the Court stated in reilevant part, "when the insurer elects to repair the car to its pre-accident condition, it is not aiso required to pay for any loss of value to the vehicle. To hold (the insurer) liable for the automobile's diminution in value would render essentially meaningless its clear right to elect to repair rather than to pay the actuell cash value of the vehicie at the time of loss. (Id. at 420.) "(A)n insurer's election to repair is concusive provided the repair places the automobile substantially in its pre-accident condition. If it does not, then the automobile is deemed a total loss and the insurer is liable for the pre-accident value of the car." (ID. at 421 citing Rav vs Farmers Ins. Exchange (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 1411, 1417 and Owens v. Pyeatt (1967) 248 Cal Apo 2d 840, 849.)

0 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

20

u/stryker_cast 1d ago

You know we can tell INSTANTLY if you use AI? Don't.

2

u/xXxDickBonerz69xXx 17h ago

Whats wild to me is how often AI says "costed" instead of "cost".

20

u/FindTheOthers623 P&C Licensed PL Underwriter 1d ago

ChatGPT is not a reliable source of anything. Neither is reddit đŸ« 

-1

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

lol yeah 💯

4

u/AlabasterNutSack 1d ago

So why do it? Why do any of this?

Ego?

-1

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

To be honest: I thought, it's something that I can get, so I pursued.

5

u/Puzzleheaded_Sun7356 19h ago

2.5 years later? Did you think?

5

u/Dramatic-Ad9089 17h ago

Sounds like OP is light in the pockets and looking for some quick easy cash. This is like every November/December when I get calls out of the blue from people with nearly year old denied claims who are asking for a check (i.e. Christmas cash).

6

u/AscendedAnime 1d ago

Yeah there’s no DV for first part claims in CA and also you’ve left out any kind of relevant info for us to even see if there is a reasonable DV claim involved but you’d have to make that with the other parties carrier and provide some proof your vehicle lost value after it was repaired to pre accident condition.

-2

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

Edited post for more details:

It was against the at fault party insurer, not my own. Car is Subaru impreza 2023 model, accident date: Nov 2023 milage: 6K at the time of accident.

Carfax consider minor damage(rear bumper+ other parts replaced). Reapirs costed 5K

0

u/AlabasterNutSack 1d ago

Minor point but, in the industry we usually refer to the other insurance company as the “adverse carrier” and the individual as the “adverse party”.

It sounds petulant when you keep using “At-fault party” over and over again. We get it, the other party is at fault. We believe you.

-3

u/Puzzleheaded_Sun7356 19h ago

Get over yourself. Everyone know what they're talking about. 

-1

u/AlabasterNutSack 16h ago

You could even say “other party” and that would be better. Just feels like people are trying to manipulate you when they put their intentions in every sentence.

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Sun7356 15h ago

Strange, because i never felt that way reading it. I felt he was trying to make the point that the other party was found "at-fault". That way, when you're reading it, you know who was at fault. Also, based off the replies OP got, lots of people couldn't figure it out.

Not everyone is as an outstanding writer like you so they don't have the deep vocabulary and the prowess to use it.

1

u/AlabasterNutSack 15h ago

Why would he be trying to get money from the other insurance company if they were not at fault?

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Sun7356 15h ago

What? Now you're lost.

Not everyone is amazing as you buddy 

1

u/AlabasterNutSack 10h ago

I know where I am. Did you have trouble answering the question?

3

u/stayclassypeople 1d ago

What are the details? Year, make, model and mileage? Severity of damage?

1

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

 It was against the at fault party insurer, not my own. Car is Subaru impreza 2023 model, accident date: Nov 2023 milage: 6K at the time of accident.

Carfax consider minor damage(rear bumper+ other parts replaced). Reapirs costed 5K

2

u/Kmelloww 14h ago

3 years later?

0

u/pineappleshaked 14h ago

I didn't know that dimished value is a thing at that time

2

u/drjenkstah 1d ago

Are you filing on your own policy or the at fault’s policy? If it’s your own policy you can’t file Diminished Value on your own policy and you’d have to file it at the at fault’s policy. 

-1

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

 Edited post for more details:

It was against the at fault party insurer, not my own. Car is Subaru impreza 2023 model, accident date: Nov 2023 milage: 6K at the time of accident.

Carfax consider minor damage(rear bumper+ other parts replaced). Reapirs costed 5K

2

u/IntelligentBox152 1d ago

There are very few scenarios where you can collect DV from your own carrier outside of GA. It seems you have not hit this scenario and as such SOL

2

u/MimosaQueen1122 1d ago

DV is only allowed first party in GA. Were you filing under your insurance or the others?

-8

u/Beneficial-Mine1763 1d ago

The post says California and the letter states California law controls so I think the OP is in California not Georgia.

7

u/MimosaQueen1122 1d ago

Yes I can read but the perception from their post is they filed first party. Hence why I bring it up.

-9

u/Beneficial-Mine1763 1d ago

If you can read english then why did you mention GA which has zero relevance to the case at hand?

2

u/MimosaQueen1122 1d ago

It has relevance as it is more likely why the denial. Please.

2

u/maxlight0 Auto Claims Adjuster 1d ago

It is relevant because OP appears to be attempting to do something you can only do in GA.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/Insurance-ModTeam 18h ago

Trolling, being needlessly rude or insulting

1

u/Disastrous_Gas_2395 1d ago

Mate are you going to even attempt to assist OP or go on about something you don’t seem to understand yourself?

1

u/No_Parking_4167 16h ago

Have the repairs been completed? Carriers will not consider a DIV claim before repairs are completed and inspected.

1

u/Capricola 14h ago

Its a 2023, you aint getting DV on a 2023 Impreza

1

u/pineappleshaked 14h ago

The accident happened in nov 2023 :/

-1

u/aries_burner_809 1d ago

It appears you filed against the wrong insurance. You should prepare a DV amount justification and submit the claim to the at-fault driver’s insurance. Small claims if they don’t pay, but I understand insurance companies like to elevate to a higher court where you’ll have a hard time without an attorney. I’m not certain about CA but if their insured reached their liability limit you may end up having to sue the driver directly. They may not have any money.

1

u/pineappleshaked 1d ago

Edited post for more details:

It was against the at fault party insurer, not my own. Car is Subaru impreza 2023 model, accident date: Nov 2023 milage: 6K at the time of accident.

Carfax consider minor damage(rear bumper+ other parts replaced). Reapirs costed 5K

1

u/rubatog 17h ago

What did you submit as evidence?

-4

u/aries_burner_809 1d ago

That sounds like there will be some DV. I didn’t dig into the details of CA rules but you absolutely can claim DV against the at-fault driver and/or their insurance. In my state it is only the driver directly (MA). In most states it is their insurance, unless they’ve hit the limit.