r/KashmirShaivism 1d ago

Question – General “Aryan Tantra”

12 Upvotes

I recently came across a post from a virtually insignificant content creator who thinks it’s significant that he is a “blood karma” aryan and is claiming to be an “aryan tantra” teacher (which is basically videos of him lazily making up claims about varnashrama dharma).

In the post he mentions that Iran is the cradle of the Vedas. I commented telling him to slow down, let’s evaluate the evidence. It’s common sense that the Vedas and Sanskrit were produced in India by Indians of Ancestral South Asian, IVC and Indo-Aryan descent. And to lock into the authentic tradition if he wants to have a better understanding of Tantra.

He then went on to preach to me the old Nazi mythic narrative about how the Aryans marched into India and brought their culture and religion with them. He also revealed to me his skewed and racist views on the role that the IVC and Ancestral South Asian groups had in the development of the Vedas, Yoga, and Tantra. In his own words, it doesn’t originate on their soil rather the aryans brought it into the land when they marched into India.

I gave him some updated archaeological evidence to dispell that narrative and made the error of taking his argument in good faith.

The danger is that sincere aspirants stumble across these kinds of people and mistake their content for a shred of genuine Tantra.

When the Custodians of Tantra have dedicated their lives to writing the literatures and opening the door for the world, i find it offensive that these people are running in the other direction and trying to tell others that that is what Tantra actually is. I find the anachronistic projection of Abhinava’s work in creating what we know as Tantra, backwards onto someone else, offensive. As a Shaiva i also find notions of aryanism and casteism offensive.

To make things more personal, this individual is also part of a “kula” that I am peripherally involved with. I have friends who are actually involved in that kula, who are involved with the Aryan guy. Why is no one taking this kind of thing seriously?

I think it is a serious matter.

Your thoughts and guidance are much appreciated.


r/KashmirShaivism 2d ago

Question – General Kula/Kaula school

6 Upvotes

Hello

Near the end of a Secret Supreme, where Lakshmanjoo is giving a summary of the different schools of Shaivism, he writes "in the practice of the Kula system, you have to realize the totality of the universe in one particle...."

He goes on about this for another paragraph but im not going to type it all out because those who are familiar already know what and where i​m refering to.

My question is, can someone refer some of the texts/literature from this system that would provide more insight into what Lakshmanjoo is refering to here?

Thank You


r/KashmirShaivism 2d ago

Question – Beginner What Is The Right Attitude Towards a Guru?

11 Upvotes

Hello to all the good people of this sub

I was considering the importance of lineage and guru, and was wondering what the right attitude one must take towards a guru. Considering that most of us here are Western, either in our entirety, or at least in our mindset, given that we find a good lineage (mentioned in the sub), and we trust that the guru is authentic, what must be the right approach to him or her? In other words, what is the level of consonance we must feel, both in the mind and the heart, before we enter a lineage?

A little bit of background about this question: I'm admittedly influenced by online discussions, where you have people claiming that an absolute, undying devotion to a guru is necessary. I also possess an indisciplined mind that is always searching for greener pastures (working on it :)

Also, like many of us here, my influences have been quite eclectic. My introduction to spiritual subjects was Neo-Advaita and pop-Hermeticism. Then bounced along till I found the works of Sri Aurobindo, whom I tremendously admire. My first introduction to Kashmir Shaivism was when I saw that Swami Lakshmanjoo had visited his ashram in Pondicherry. I was immediately entranced by the man, although regrettably, I did not explore his teachings much more.

I think I would like to take a more structured approach to this process, hence the question about joining an organization. This goes against my natural instinct of not wanting to belong anywhere, hence my question. I suspect that a big chunk of you guys also share the love for freedom, so I hope this strikes a chord.

I had a wonderful conversation with one of the key members of this sub, where I was advised to go for a lineage with a living guru. But given all the exhortations you read online, like, "You must be willing to do anything the guru says," I was wondering what the right attitude towards the guru, regarding:

  1. our spontaneous bhakti for them;
  2. the trust we vest in them;
  3. whether their word is final, and whether we should consider them to be Shiva/Devi incarnate;
  4. whether we have to feel an upwelling of love/trust (before we get to know them).

It's easy to be wrong, biased. It's also easy to be either dependent or dismissive. It's easy to be clouded by momentary infatuation, or alternatively, not feel a connect right away. We may project upon the guru. The common advice of "trust your gut" may not apply to beginners or confused souls...

TLDR: Given all the tricks the mind plays, how do we know when a guru or a teaching is right for us? Especially if we're considering diksha, and are interested in a balance of philosophy and practice.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!


r/KashmirShaivism 2d ago

Question – General Connecting with Fellow Bhairava & Bhairavī Upāsakas (Trika Śaivism)

4 Upvotes

Anyone in here who worships Lord Bhairav or Maa Bhairavi, I wanna be your friend. I'm a white dude living in the UK who found Trika Tantra/ Kashmir Shaivism about 5 years ago and I believe Kaal Bhairav to be my Ishta Devata. If you have anything of interest you want to share or teach about Bhairava or your personal experiences, please feel free. Unfortunately I am currently a nigurā given my geographical limitations, but I'm deeply interested in connecting as much as possible with people on the path. Hmu.


r/KashmirShaivism 3d ago

Question – General Do you have faith in the world getting better?

5 Upvotes

It at times seems like things will not really improve.

I'm ethically not able to have a child because I don't want them to see this world.

An adopting would give me more attachment to a person who may suffer and I may be unable to prevent that suffering.

Especially suffering caused by other members of society who don't care about spirituality.

I entered a bit of a state of just welcoming death to leave this world.

Over the fact 99.9% of people don't experience oneness or the joy of kundalini awakening.

I was a homeless person before as a teenager. Depressed. Parents didn't want to be parents.

An honestly not many people were kind to me. Then became a adult and people are even worse now that they're limited on time and need all the money.

Every time there is a chance to vote I laugh inside. Like oh let's throw a performance again for very little to happen. Sell some merchandise on the side. Write those articles and speeches. Throw parades.

Bullshit. So much bullshit. Kali Yuga... I've done so much charity but it's never enough. An not like rest of society wants to give back always or can...

I wonder if there is wisdom for situations like this. To be jaded as a world savior. To just want leave the world for another world.


r/KashmirShaivism 3d ago

Discussion – Itihāsa/History Pedigree of Achārya Abhinavagupta

Thumbnail gallery
5 Upvotes

r/KashmirShaivism 4d ago

Discussion – Darśana/Philosophy Sanskrit for KS [2] - मातृका - बन्धयित्री सिद्ध्युपपादिका च।

10 Upvotes

अद्य वयं स्वातन्त्र्यवादे मातृकाविषये ज्ञास्यामः। (Today we will learn about मातृका in स्वातन्त्र्यवादः (another name for Kashmir Shaivism, literally meaning the philosophy (वादः) of स्वातन्त्र्यम् (freedom))).

The sentences (वाक्यानि) in a language (भाषा) are constructed out of words. The word is called शब्दः, and a word consists of letters (अक्षराणि). The collection of all the letters out of which words, and finally sentences, are created is called मातृका.

The most common definition of मातृका is आदिक्षान्तरूपा मातृका (मातृका is that which starts with the letter अ and ends with क्ष).

Another definition of मातृका as given by क्षेमराजाचार्यः in शिवसूत्रविमर्शिनी is that अज्ञाता माता मातृका (the unknown mother is मातृका). The etymology of the word मातृका is मातृ + क. मातृ means माता, and क is a प्रत्ययः (suffix) in grammar, which has several meanings, but the meaning intended here is in the sense of 'unknown' (अज्ञाते कः प्रत्ययः).

The idea is that माता (mother), i.e., शक्तिः (power), when unknown is बन्धयित्री (bondage-causing), and when known, it is सिद्ध्युपपादिका (an enabler for prosperity/perfection).

And therefore, the fourth शिवसूत्रम् is ज्ञानाधिष्ठानं मातृका. The meaning is that the base (अधिष्ठानम्) of ज्ञानम् (limited knowledge, i.e., bondage) is मातृका.

This is worth pondering carefully and is one of the most important concepts of स्वातन्त्र्यवादः.

The collection of letters, i.e., मातृका, or words, i.e., शब्दः, or language in general, i.e., वाक्, is a cause of bondage when not understood.

To understand why limited knowledge governed by शब्दः or मातृका is binding in the first place, let's look at स्पन्दकारिका (Spandakārikā) 3.14, which says:

परामृतरसापायस्तस्य यः प्रत्ययोद्भवः

The commentary by क्षेमराजः explains:

तस्य पशोर्यः प्रत्ययानां लौकिकशास्त्रीयविकल्पानां तदधिवासितानां भिन्नार्थज्ञानानां विकल्पानामप्युद्भवः विनाशाघ्रात उत्पादः स परस्यामृतस्य चिद्घनस्यानन्दप्रसरस्यापायो निमज्जनम्।

The commentary helps us understand the कारिका by expanding the meaning of the words used therein. It says तस्य (his) refers to पशोः (the bound one's). The word प्रत्ययोद्भवः in the कारिका is broken down in the commentary as प्रत्ययानाम् उद्भवः (the rising of विकल्पाः, dissecting thoughts). ईश्वरप्रत्यभिज्ञा explains that विकल्पः means इदं नेदं (this but not this, i.e., choosing one thing over another). The word प्रत्ययः is also explained with लौकिकशास्त्रीयविकल्पः, which means dissecting thoughts of worldly matters (लौकिक) as well as scriptures (शास्त्रीय). And the rising of विकल्पाः causes the disappearance (अपायः) of the bliss (आनन्दप्रसरस्य) of the nectar of consciousness (चिद्घनस्य).

I can't stop myself from saying this: don't we all sometimes feel more tired and consumed by reading the scriptures that are supposed to free us? This is the exact reason why it happens. Reading the scriptures results in the appearance of dissecting thoughts that, instead of healing us, deepen our bondage or wounds. And so we feel an urgent need to quickly resolve conflicts that occur because of it. For example, people ask: "You just said I am supreme शिवः, and this is all my शक्तिः, so why am I in so much suffering? Is शिवः this stupid to not be able to see how bad this world has become because of this mere play?"

As a result, many people, including me once in a while, find more relief in a simple भजनम्, कीर्तनम्, meditation, sleep, or just thinking about nothing, because that helps us get rid of the विकल्पाः. It is nothing but विकल्पः that deepens our bondage. And so, it is no surprise that I know many people who are spiritual and choose to completely avoid any philosophical discussions because it makes them feel more strangled in bondage.

To see how विकल्पः leads to the disappearance of great bliss, क्षेमराजः explains further:

उदितेषु भिन्नार्थेषु प्रत्ययेषु चिद्भूमिः स्थिताप्यपरामृश्यमानत्वादस्थितेव लक्ष्यते, तत एवमुक्तम्।

(When different विकल्पाः rise (उदितेषु भिन्नार्थेषु प्रत्ययेषु) [in the mind], the land of चित् (pure consciousness) (चिद्भूमिः), even though existing (स्थितापि), because it is not recognized (अपरामृश्यमानत्वात्), seems (लक्ष्यते) as if non-existent (अस्थिता इव). Therefore (ततः) this (एवम्) was said (उक्तम्).)

Now that we understand how limited knowledge, i.e., विकल्पः (dissecting thoughts), leads to bondage—which is the essence of the शिवसूत्रम् — ज्ञानं बन्धः.

Let's understand the relationship between शब्दः and विकल्पः.

This is one of the most important ideas of स्वातन्त्र्यवादः. If the theory of शब्दः, as understood by KS, is not recognized, then the whole of KS will remain a mystery and a source of confusion. This is the reason many आचार्याः suggest understanding भर्तृहरि's वाक्यपदीयम्, from which KS borrows a lot of ideas.

The first important thing to understand is that शब्दः does not just mean the gross word out of which, for example, this post is written. शब्दः is basically an entity that encapsulates meaning: यस्माद् अर्थः भाव्यते सः शब्दः।

And therefore, स्पन्दकारिका 15 says:

शब्दानुवेधेन न विना प्रत्ययोद्भवः

The अन्वयः would be: शब्दानुवेधेन विना (without the association of words) न प्रत्ययोद्भवः (meaning cannot arise).

Something similar is said in वाक्यपदीयम् 1.131:

न सोऽस्ति प्रत्ययो लोके यः शब्दानुगमादृते ।

अनुविद्धम् इव ज्ञानं सर्वं शब्देन भासते ॥

Coming back to the कारिका, प्रत्ययः means ज्ञानम् (meaning knowledge or cognition), and as per क्षेमराजः, it is of two kinds: विकल्पकं ज्ञानम् अविकल्पकं ज्ञानं च (deterministic cognition and non-deterministic cognition).

यः प्रत्ययोद्भवो विकल्पकाविकल्पकज्ञानप्रसरः स शब्दानुवेधेन अहमिदं जानामि इत्यादिना सूक्ष्मान्तःशब्दानुरञ्जनेन स्थूलाभिलापसंसर्गेण च विना न भवति।

Here क्षेमराजः divides शब्दः into two categories: the first is the inner subtle knowing (सूक्ष्मान्तःशब्दः) that cannot be put into definite words, and the other is concrete gross knowledge governed by gross words (स्थूलाभिलापसंसर्गः). These two respectively map to अविकल्पज्ञानम् and विकल्पज्ञानम्.

अविकल्पज्ञानम् is like when you quickly remove your hand as soon as you touch something hot. Your action is involuntary because no definite, concrete knowledge happens before the hand is removed. The hand is removed quickly without any concrete thinking. विकल्पज्ञानम् is like something that can be put into concrete words, like बुभुक्षितोऽस्मि (I am hungry). Of course, you could be hungry, and yet your mind won't ever register that you are hungry because you are busy with other tasks. In this case, अविकल्पज्ञानम् is there, but विकल्पज्ञानम् is not formed. I think some of us might have experienced the state when our life might have been in danger, but we felt no suffering or fear because we were too busy answering the situation at hand. For example, running from a ferocious animal or saving ourselves when drowning. This confirms क्षेमराजः's previous statement that it is the विकल्पः which makes us suffer and the cause of our bondage.

This अविकल्पज्ञानम् is also called स्वलक्षणम् or निर्विकल्पज्ञानं, which is talked about in detail in the second chapter of ईश्वरप्रत्यभिज्ञाकारिका (ज्ञानाधिकारे द्वितीयाह्निके). This अविकल्पज्ञानम् is the basis of all विकल्पज्ञानम्.

क्षेमराजः goes further and shows how this शब्दः even exists in animals lower than humans because they too have knowledge of things like hunger, acceptance, rejection, etc. Therefore, शब्दः is not merely what we utter through the mouth; it is also the subtle knowledge, without a gross word, that we feel inside. In fact, the core "I feeling" that is विमर्शः is the basis of all limited knowledge.

When I first learned that विकल्पाः are a cause of bondage, I did a kind of meditation that I think we all can do to feel the power of विकल्पाः. Let your mind think whatever it wants, but just give it a single condition: don't think about anything that can be put into words, except that everything is fine. As soon as a subtle thought starts manifesting into an idea that you can put into words, immediately discard that thought or idea from your mind. I don't know about you, but I feel so complete and free, whenever I do this kind of meditation.

Coming back to the कारिका, here is what क्षेमराजः says:

तिरश्चामप्यसाङ्केतिकः निर्देशप्रख्यः (a non-conventional indicative sign (a king of language) is prominent even in lower animals),

स्वात्मनि शिरोनिर्देशप्रख्योऽन्तरभ्युपगमरूपः शब्दनविमर्शोऽस्त्येव (something like the nod of a head within oneself to indicate acceptance, such a शब्दनविमर्शः (speech = reflection) exists),

अन्यथा बालस्य प्रथमसंकेतग्रहणं न घटेत अन्तरूहापोहात्मकविमर्शशून्यत्वात्। (Otherwise, a child would never understand a conventional sign if they lack inward thinking. (And thinking cannot happen without subtle words, so ultimately subtle word exist — this is the intent))

स्थूलशब्दानुवेधमयस्तु विकल्पः सर्वस्य स्वानुभवसिद्धः। (The विकल्पः that is governed by gross words is evident to everybody [so no need to explain it].)

It is also worthwhile reading what आचार्यः रामकण्ठः says about शब्दः in his स्पन्दकारिकाविवृतिः

शब्दः खलु प्रत्यवमर्शात्मा ... स च सर्वावच्छेदविरहितविशुद्धचित्प्रकाशात्मकमुख्यार्थनिष्ठः सन् प्रत्यवमर्श इत्युच्यते। जातिगुणक्रियाभिधानादिविविधविशेषावच्छिन्नभिन्नरूपविश्वात्मकार्थावभासनिष्ठस्तु विविधकल्पनात्मकत्वात् विकल्प इत्युच्यते। तदेव शब्दस्य मुख्यं रूपं, तत्संकेतत्वेन व्यवस्थितः श्रोत्रग्राह्यो ध्वनिविशेषात्मकोऽर्थ एव प्रायेण शब्द इति व्यवह्रियते।

तस्माच्छब्दरूपतामापन्नाः प्रत्ययोद्भवप्राणभूताः शक्तय एवास्य स्वरूपावरणे सदोद्युक्ता इति शक्तिवर्गस्य भोग्यतां गतः सन् पशुः स्मृतः।

It's getting late, and I'm ending this post without translating it.

Feel free to ask your doubts or mention any corrections or disagreements. Understanding the theory of शब्दः, विकल्पज्ञानम्, and अविकल्पज्ञानम् is key to understanding KS. First, a साधकः enjoys infinite bliss by resting in the निर्विकल्पज्ञानम् (=अविकल्पज्ञानम्) where the bliss of consciousness (चिद्रसः) is evident; this step is called निमीलनसमाधिः. Then, they try to experience that bliss even when विकल्पज्ञानम् is proliferating; this is the hard part and is called उन्मीलनसमाधिः by क्षेमराजः in स्पन्दनिर्णयः.

इति शिवम्


r/KashmirShaivism 4d ago

Question – Beginner Localized Ānanda to Sarvīkaraṇa - feedback needed

11 Upvotes

I would like the view of practitioners who have worked seriously with the practical dimensions of Trika. In practice I am beginning to wonder whether what ordinarily appears as a particularly concentrated form of ānanda may be understood, not primarily in terms of its gross ādhāra, but as a momentary disclosure of pūrṇatā / pūrṇāhantā, in which the usual movement of want, acquisition and succession temporarily collapses. What interests me is whether Kaula-sādhana gradually separates this principle of ānanda from dependence upon any single ālambana and allows the same intensity of fulfilment to become recognizable throughout the entire indriya-cakra—in dṛṣṭi, śravaṇa, rasa, sparśa and also in progressively subtler antar-anubhava.

In other words, could one say that the initially highly contracted form of this experience is only a particularly accessible manifestation of visarga-śakti, whereas through sādhana the same visarga becomes increasingly non-local, so that each viṣaya and each indriya may reveal its own point of saṃghaṭṭa between prakāśa and vimarśa? Instead of ānanda terminating with the exhaustion of a particular vṛtti, the vṛtti itself would be recognized as the expansion and repose of Śakti within Bhairava.

Phenomenologically it sometimes seems as though there are multiple peripheral “junctions” at which Śiva–Śakti-saṃghaṭṭa can become evident, corresponding to different śaktis of cognition, sensation and internal movement, and that these are gathered progressively toward a more fundamental madhya. The various devatās of the cakra then appear less like external symbolic figures and more like differentiated functions or modalities of the one saṃvit—each governing a particular movement of grahaṇa, prakāśana, saṃkoca or vikāsa.

Would it therefore be legitimate, from a Trika/Kaula standpoint, to understand the sādhana as the progressive sarvīkaraṇa of ānanda: taking an initially localized and strongly conditioned experience of pūrṇatā, recognizing its underlying visarga, extending that recognition throughout the indriya- and devatā-cakra, and finally allowing these apparently distributed saṃghaṭṭas to resolve into the central Bhairava-saṃghaṭṭa where kula is recognized as never separate from akula?


r/KashmirShaivism 5d ago

Discussion – Sādhanā/Practice The Sādhana of Samabhāva in Kashmir Shaivism

Thumbnail indica.today
12 Upvotes

An excellent article on the topic of samabhāva, of seeing everyone in an equal light, by a devoted student of KS and Swami Lakshmanjoo Mahārāj.


r/KashmirShaivism 5d ago

Content – Living Tradition Sanskrit For KS [1]

21 Upvotes

u/kuds1001 asked me if I could create a series of posts related to learning Sanskrit. This is one such post.

Although learning Sanskrit is not absolutely essential to understand the core message of KS, however it does have its own benefits. Most of the verses such as the following one which we are going to discuss today lose some of their charm when they are translated to English. There are two types of writings in Sanskrit (it's a gross simplification) - गद्यम् and पद्यम्. The difference between the two is that पद्यम् has fixed arrangement of letters decided by the छन्दः (meter) the पद्यम् falls under, so we can sing it. It has the added benefit that we can also remember it easily. The English equivalent of पद्यम् in English I think is poem. The other one is गद्यम् which has no restriction on the number and arrangement of letters, and hence cannot be sung.

So, let's see one such पद्यम् today spoken by आचार्य अभिनवगुप्त at the end of his work ईश्वरप्रत्यभिज्ञाविवृतिविमर्शिनी ---

पाषाणान् प्रति वक्तु कः शृणुत भो युष्मान् ब्रुवे जङ्गमाः
शय्योत्थायमनर्थमर्थसरणे कोऽयं वृथैवोद्यमः।
संविद्धामनि शाम्भवे विशथ चेत्कालीयमेकं लवं
किं किं वर्णनिकाभिराभिरभितः सत्यं स्वयं ज्ञास्यथ॥

There are four पादः (parts) in this पद्यम्. And this पद्यम् is written in शार्दूलविक्रीडितं छन्दः, छन्दः means meter in which the पद्यं is arranged. Every पादः of this पद्यम् has 12 + 7 = 19 स्वराः. There's यतिः at the end of 12th स्वरः, which means we have to pause a little while singing it.

Let's consider the first पादः

पाषाणान् प्रति वक्तु कः शृणुत भो युष्मान् ब्रुवे जङ्गमाः

Lets separate the स्वराः from the above पादः -

आ आ आ अ इ अ उ अः ऋ उ अ ओ <यतिः> उ आ उ ए अ अ आः

You can see that there are 19 स्वराः in total in this पादः and यतिः occurs after the 12th स्वरः ie ओ and the corresponding word is भो after which we have to give a little pause.

There are many ways to sing this शार्दूलविक्रीडितं छन्दः, the one I'm aware of, and in which I've sung this पद्यम् is this one - https://youtu.be/X6yvYgPjTtk?si=FRp8Yd2KZZa__l9H

Let's try to understand the meaning of this पद्यम् -

To understand the meaning of a पद्यम्, especially when we are beginner in Sanskrit, we should first do सन्धिविच्छेदः ie separate out the words by undoing the सन्धिः

पदच्छेदः -

पाषाणान् प्रति वक्तु कः श्रणुत भो युष्मान् ब्रुवे जङ्गमाः
शय्योत्थायम् अनर्थम् अर्थसरणे कः अयम् वृथा एव उद्यमः।
संविद्धामनि शाम्भवे विशथ चेत् कालीयम् एकं लवं
किं किं वर्णनिकाभिः आभिः अभितः सत्यं स्वयं ज्ञास्यथ॥

The next step is to compose the अन्वयः, that is restructure the words of पद्यम् so we can create वाक्यानि (sentences) that are easy to understand.

अन्वयः -

कः पाषाणान् प्रति वक्तु? भोः जङ्गमाः (अहम्) युष्मान् ब्रुवे। शृणुत। शय्योत्थायम् अनर्थम् (प्रति) अर्थसरणे कः अयम् वृथा एव उद्यमः? शाम्भवे संविद्धामनि एकं कालीयं लवं वशथ चेत्, (तर्हि) आभिः वर्णनिकाभिः अभितः किं किं (वर्णयामि), सत्यं स्वयं ज्ञास्यथ।

To construct the अन्वय is one of the most difficult parts of deciphering a पद्यम and an important one. To construct the अन्वयः, the first step is to identify the क्रिया (verb), then the कर्ता (doer of verb), then कर्म (object of the verb) and then the rest (करणम्, अपादानम् etc.).

When constructing the अन्वयः, we might have to sometimes assume some common words to make sense of certain वाक्यं, this procedure of assuming words which are not there in the पद्यम् but we assume for the sake of meaning is called अध्याहारः. In the above अन्वयः, the words in parentheses, such as प्रति, तर्हि, वर्णयामि, etc are added by the principle of अध्याहारः for the sake of meaning, which are not present in the original पद्यम्.

The last step is to understand the meaning of each word and hence each sentence, and finally you have the literal meaning of the above पद्यम् -

कः [Who] पाषाणान् प्रति वक्तु [would speak to the stones] ? भोः जङ्गमाः [O conscious beings] (अहम्) युष्मान् ब्रुवे [I speak to you]। शृणुत [Listen]। शय्योत्थायम् [Again and again, after waking from bed] अनर्थम् [a meaningless end] (प्रति) [(towards)] अर्थसरणे [in the web of objects] कः अयम् [what's this] वृथा [useless] एव [indeed] उद्यमः [pursuit]? शाम्भवे [In Shiva's] संविद्धामनि [abode of pure Consciousness] एकं [a single] कालीयं [of time] लवं [fraction] विशथ [you enter] चेत् [if], (तर्हि) [(then)] आभिः [with these] वर्णनिकाभिः [descriptions] अभितः [all around] किं किं [what, what] (प्रयोजनम्) [(should I describe)], सत्यं [the Truth] स्वयं [by yourselves] ज्ञास्यथ [you will know]।

So the literal meaning is as follows -

Who would speak to the stones. O conscious beings, I speak to you. Listen. What's this vain pursuit towards a meaningless end in the web of objects? If you enter in Shiva's abode of pure consciousness for even a fraction of time, then what what should I describe with all these extensive descriptions? You will know the Truth by yourselves!"

This is the literal meaning. Those who are experts would go even deeper and try to understand the deep meanings intended by the author here, the hidden meaning (व्यङ्ग्यार्थः) that might not be obvious, but can be sought by a सहदृयः (a learned, good-hearted person). For example, one might deduce that the reason why आचार्य अभिनवगुप्त calls out "Who would speak to the stones", there might be a hidden meaning there. But this is out of the scope of this post. So I will rest here.

Would you like to pick one of your favorite पद्यानि and write its अन्वयः? It's a good practice and helps us to concretely understand the meaning.


r/KashmirShaivism 5d ago

Question – Beginner Interesting text

1 Upvotes

Greetings to everyone!

I recently came across this text, and I like it very much. However, I haven't been able to find any source for it, so I'm curious to hear what you think about it. Have any of you encountered this text before, or what is your opinion of it?

Thank you very much in advance! Daniel

अद्वैतस्वातन्त्र्यविज्ञानतन्त्रम्

Advaita-svātantrya-vijñāna-tantram

The Tantra of the Recognition of Non-Duality and Freedom

“At the beginning of the universes, Kṛṣṇa divided Himself into two parts: one is Śrī Kṛṣṇa, Lord of the cowherd girls, the other is Mahādeva.”

Devī Bhāgavatam, Book 4, Chapter 2

अथ भैरवी उवाच — Bhairavī’s Question

एकं चेत् परमं तत्त्वं कथं द्वैतमिदं विभो ।
कथं भोक्ता च भोग्यं च कथं काम्यं च कामुकः ॥

ekaṃ cet paramaṃ tattvaṃ kathaṃ dvaitam idaṃ vibho |
kathaṃ bhoktā ca bhogyaṃ ca kathaṃ kāmyaṃ ca kāmukaḥ ||

If the supreme reality is one, O all-pervading Lord, how does duality appear? How arise the experiencer and the experienced, the desirer and the desired?

कुतो देहः कुतो विश्वं कुतो भेदस्य सम्भवः ।
कथं भेदः प्रशाम्येत कथं कामः प्रसिध्यति ॥

kuto dehaḥ kuto viśvaṃ kuto bhedasya sambhavaḥ |
kathaṃ bhedaḥ praśāmyeta kathaṃ kāmaḥ prasidhyati ||

Whence arise the body and the world, and whence the appearance of difference? How is difference pacified in its source, and how is desire brought to its true completion?

देहक्षेत्रं कथं देव कथं बालद्वयं मनः ।
कथं क्रीडारसं प्राप्य स्वभावं पुनराप्नुयाम् ॥

dehakṣetraṃ kathaṃ deva kathaṃ bāladvayaṃ manaḥ |
kathaṃ krīḍārasaṃ prāpya svabhāvaṃ punar āpnuyām ||

How, O Lord, is the body itself the field? How may consciousness be contemplated as the two children? How, entering the rasa of their play, may I recognize my own nature again?

कथं क्षेत्रं तनुर्भूत्वा कुण्डली भैरवी भवेत् ।
भैरवश्च कथं देहे प्रकाशोऽनुभवे स्थितः ॥

kathaṃ kṣetraṃ tanur bhūtvā kuṇḍalī bhairavī bhavet |
bhairavaś ca kathaṃ dehe prakāśo ’nubhave sthitaḥ ||

How does the field manifest as the body? How is Bhairavī present as Kuṇḍalinī? And how does Bhairava abide in embodied experience as the light by which it is known?

हृदयोत्थाश्च ये कामाः कथं शक्तिस्वरूपिणः ।
कथं बालस्वरूपेण द्वैतग्रन्थिर्विलीयते ॥

hṛdayotthāś ca ye kāmāḥ kathaṃ śaktisvarūpiṇaḥ |
kathaṃ bālasvarūpeṇa dvaitagranthir vilīyate ||

How are the desires arising from the heart forms of Śakti? And through the form of the children, how is the knot of exclusive duality dissolved?

भैरव उवाच — Bhairava’s Answer

शृणु भैरवि तत्त्वं मे क्षेत्रदेहरहस्यकम् ।
बालभावं समाश्रित्य स्वभावं प्रत्यभिज्ञसे ॥

śṛṇu bhairavi tattvaṃ me kṣetradeharahasyakam |
bālabhāvaṃ samāśritya svabhāvaṃ pratyabhijñase ||

Listen, Bhairavī, to the mystery of the field and the body. Taking refuge in the contemplative form of the children, you recognize again your own nature.

क्षेत्रं देहः स्वयं चित्तं बालरूपद्वयं स्मृतम् ।
भैरवो भैरवी चैव एकचित्तस्य क्रीडितम् ॥

kṣetraṃ dehaḥ svayaṃ cittaṃ bālarūpadvayaṃ smṛtam |
bhairavo bhairavī caiva ekacittasya krīḍitam ||

The field is contemplated as this very body; consciousness is contemplated in the two child-forms. Bhairava and Bhairavī are the play of the one Consciousness, not two independently existing principles.

न तत्र न्यूनता काचिन्न कामोऽपूर्णतात्मकः ।
पूर्णानन्दरसः क्रीडा स्वातन्त्र्यस्य विजृम्भिता ॥

na tatra nyūnatā kācin na kāmo ’pūrṇatātmakaḥ |
pūrṇānandarasaḥ krīḍā svātantryasya vijṛmbhitā ||

There is no deficiency there, nor is primordial desire born from incompleteness. The play is the rasa of complete bliss, the unfolding of Consciousness through its own freedom.

The two children are therefore not two eternal substances. They are two distinguishable forms within the self-manifestation of one awareness: Bhairava as luminous awareness and Bhairavī as its inseparable freedom, power, self-apprehension, and manifestation. Their distinction is real as appearance and play, but never separation in being.

Each prose section below is accompanied by a Sanskrit anuṣṭubh-style metrical recension and IAST transliteration. The Sanskrit verses are a newly composed metrical rendering of this work, not quotations from an ancient source.

I. Vṛndāvana, Kailāsa, and the Field

वृन्दावनं स्मरेन्नित्यं प्रेमक्रीडारसाश्रयम् ।
तन्मध्ये कैलसं ध्यायेदुमया सहितं शिवम् ॥

vṛndāvanaṃ smaren nityaṃ premakrīḍārasāśrayam |
tanmadhye kailasaṃ dhyāyed umayā sahitaṃ śivam ||

कैलासपृष्ठतो ध्यायेत् क्षेत्रं विस्तीर्णमद्भुतम् ।
स्वदेहमेव तत् क्षेत्रं चित्क्रीडायाः प्रतिष्ठितम् ॥

kailāsapṛṣṭhato dhyāyet kṣetraṃ vistīrṇam adbhutam |
svadeham eva tat kṣetraṃ citkrīḍāyāḥ pratiṣṭhitam ||

दक्षिणे सरसी रम्या वामे वनपरम्परा ।
देहक्षेत्रे तयोर्मध्ये बालौ क्रीडापरायणौ ॥

dakṣiṇe sarasī ramyā vāme vanaparamparā |
dehakṣetre tayor madhye bālau krīḍāparāyaṇau ||

I contemplate Vṛndāvana as the timeless space of love, relationship, play, and the manifold moods of experience.

Within its expanse I contemplate Kailāsa. Upon Kailāsa I contemplate Mahādeva and Umā.

Behind Kailāsa the landscape opens into a broad field. When I meditate, I do not place an alien landscape before myself. My own body is contemplated as this field.

The field is bordered on the right by a lake and on the left by belts of forest. Beyond the forest opens Vṛndāvana, and beyond another belt of forest lies the yellow-sanded village.

I do not contemplate the body as an inert point. The body becomes a landscape of manifestation. As body, I am the field; as consciousness, I am the awareness in which the two children play.

II. The Two Children

न न्यूनत्वात् प्रवर्तेते बालौ क्रीडारसोत्सुकौ ।
पूर्णस्य स्वेच्छया शक्तिः क्रीडारूपेण वर्तते ॥

na nyūnatvāt pravartete bālau krīḍārasotsukau |
pūrṇasya svecchayā śaktiḥ krīḍārūpeṇa vartate ||

भेदो लीलार्थमुदितो न भेदः परमार्थतः ।
भैरवो भैरवी चैव चिदेकस्य स्वरूपिणौ ॥

bhedo līlārtham udito na bhedaḥ paramārthataḥ |
bhairavo bhairavī caiva cidekasya svarūpiṇau ||

भैरवोऽहं भैरवी चाहं बालरूपे व्यवस्थितः ।
एकानन्दस्य रूपे द्वे क्रीडतः क्षेत्रमध्यतः ॥

bhairavo ’haṃ bhairavī cāhaṃ bālarūpe vyavasthitaḥ |
ekānandasya rūpe dve krīḍataḥ kṣetramadhyataḥ ||

I am Bhairava and I am Bhairavī, contemplated in the child-forms: two forms of one bliss playing within the field.

I run after the beautiful form running before me. Then the play reverses and the other child-form follows me. At other times the two sit facing one another; at other times they play in different places of the field.

The movement of the children does not arise from lack. There is no object whose acquisition could make Consciousness complete. The movement itself is the free play of fullness.

Bhairava's joy continues in Bhairavī's joy, and Bhairavī's joy in Bhairava's joy. The distinction permits relation and play; non-separation prevents that distinction from becoming absolute division.

I do not contemplate this from outside. As body I am the field; as consciousness I am their common ground; as Śakti I am the movement of their play.

III. The Lake and the Closed Lotuses

क्षेत्रदक्षिणभागे तु सरसी विमला शुभा ।
निमीलितानि पद्मानि तस्यां सुप्तानि भावयेत् ॥

kṣetradakṣiṇabhāge tu sarasī vimalā śubhā |
nimīlitāni padmāni tasyāṃ suptāni bhāvayet ||

देहभावाः प्रसुप्तास्ते पद्मेष्वव्यक्तरूपिणः ।
यथाकालं प्रबुध्यन्ते शक्तेः स्वातन्त्र्यलीलया ॥

dehabhāvāḥ prasuptās te padmeṣv avyaktarūpiṇaḥ |
yathākālaṃ prabudhyante śakteḥ svātantryalīlayā ||

आकाशं सलिले भाति भिन्नं चाप्यविभाजितम् ।
तथैव विश्वमखिलं चिदाकाशे प्रकाशते ॥

ākāśaṃ salile bhāti bhinnaṃ cāpy avibhājitam |
tathaiva viśvam akhilaṃ cidākāśe prakāśate ||

On the right side of the field lies a wondrous lake. Its shore is surrounded by flowers and plants; animals move around it and birds above its water. Closed lotuses rest upon the surface.

Within the closed lotuses I contemplate embodied manifestation. What unfolds as bodily experience is present here in an unexpanded form.

The sky is reflected in the lake. Water and sky are distinguishable without becoming alien to one another. Their relation is already present in the one field of experience.

Because my body is the field, the lake too belongs to the landscape of my embodiment. Because awareness is not other than the power by which the landscape appears, I am also the one who knows and plays within it.

IV. The Yellow-Sanded Village

वामे वनान्तरे ध्यायेद् ग्रामं पीतसिकतामयम् ।
गेहं भग्नं च वरणं शुष्ककूपं च भावयेत् ॥

vāme vanāntare dhyāyed grāmaṃ pītasikatāmayam |
gehaṃ bhagnaṃ ca varaṇaṃ śuṣkakūpaṃ ca bhāvayet ||

तत्रापि बालकौ तौ द्वौ नामरूपान्तरस्थितौ ।
संकोचे शक्तिमन्विच्छेन्न दोषं धर्मतां नयेत् ॥

tatrāpi bālakau tau dvau nāmarūpāntarasthitau |
saṃkoce śaktim anvicchen na doṣaṃ dharmatāṃ nayet ||

Beyond the forest belt on the left I contemplate a yellow-sanded village: dry pale sand, a house, a broken fence, a sandy courtyard, and a dried-up well.

The two children appear here as well. Their play may continue under names such as Adharma and Mṛṣā and through the forms associated with them.

I do not deny the destructive forms of experience. I seek the deeper power appearing through them without declaring their contracted expression either identical with or different from the uncontracted state.

Thus the practice is the recognition of identity, not the erasure of distinctions of function, consequence, or conduct.

V. The Field Becoming the Body

क्षेत्रमेव तनुर्भूत्वा स्वशक्त्या सम्प्रकाशते ।
भैरवी शक्तिरूपा सा भैरवः प्रकाशकः ॥

kṣetram eva tanur bhūtvā svaśaktyā samprakāśate |
bhairavī śaktirūpā sā bhairavaḥ prakāśakaḥ ||

The field, becoming the body, manifests through its own Śakti. Bhairavī is that Power; Bhairava is the luminous awareness by which manifestation is revealed.

न भिन्नौ भैरवीशौ तौ न चैकत्वेन नाशितौ ।
एकस्य चित्स्वभावस्य क्रीडया रूपभेदिनौ ॥

na bhinnau bhairavīśau tau na caikatvena nāśitau |
ekasya citsvabhāvasya krīḍayā rūpabhedinau ||

Bhairava and Bhairavī are not separate realities, nor are their forms destroyed by unity. Through play they are differentiated forms of the one nature of Consciousness.

बालक्रीडा न नश्येत सा देहेऽपि प्रवर्तते ।
क्षेत्रं देहत्वमापन्नं स्वातन्त्र्येण प्रकाशते ॥

bālakrīḍā na naśyeta sā dehe ’pi pravartate |
kṣetraṃ dehatvam āpannaṃ svātantryeṇa prakāśate ||

The children's play does not perish; it continues in embodiment. The field appears as body through the freedom of Consciousness.

Bhairavī may be contemplated in embodiment as Kuṇḍalinī, the contracted and unfolding power of the same Śakti.

Bhairava does not become merely the limited belief 'I am only this body.' Bhairava is the light of awareness through which even bodily identity is experienced.

The limited bodily 'I' is therefore not outside Bhairava, but neither is limitation itself the fullness of Bhairava. It is a contracted mode of the one power of self-experience.

The practitioner does not reject the body. The body is recognized as a real appearance within Consciousness, a form of its self-manifestation.

VI. Desire and Icchāśakti

पूर्णे चिति न वै न्यूनं काममूलं सुखं परम् ।
संकोचाद् विषयाकाङ्क्षा विकासादिच्छया स्थिता ॥

pūrṇe citi na vai nyūnaṃ kāmamūlaṃ sukhaṃ param |
saṃkocād viṣayākāṅkṣā vikāsād icchayā sthitā ||

कामं मूलं नयेद् धीमानिच्छां शक्तिं च भावयेत् ।
शक्तिं भैरवसाम्येन पश्यन् पूर्णत्वमाप्नुयात् ॥

kāmaṃ mūlaṃ nayed dhīmān icchāṃ śaktiṃ ca bhāvayet |
śaktiṃ bhairavasāmyena paśyan pūrṇatvam āpnuyāt ||

सिद्धिर्वा न भवेद् बाह्या कामस्य विषयाश्रया ।
स्वमूलस्य परिज्ञानं प्रथमं फलमुच्यते ॥

siddhir vā na bhaved bāhyā kāmasya viṣayāśrayā |
svamūlasya parijñānaṃ prathamaṃ phalam ucyate ||

कामस्य मूलमानन्दो नेच्छा न्यूनत्वसम्भवा ।
संकोचे विषयाकाङ्क्षा पूर्णे सा इच्छाशक्तिता ॥

kāmasya mūlam ānando necchā nyūnatvasambhavā |
saṃkoce viṣayākāṅkṣā pūrṇe sā icchāśaktitā ||

The deepest ground of desire is bliss; primordial willing does not arise from deficiency. Under contraction it appears as longing for an object; recognized in fullness, it is the power of willing, icchāśakti.

Thus the root of embodied desire is not lack in the field. There is no lack in the uncontracted ground.

Yet the recognition of this ground is not a guarantee that every object imagined by the limited individual must externally appear. The fruit of recognition is first the recognition of the power within desire.

I follow desire toward its source: from object-longing to willing, from willing to Śakti, and from Śakti to the non-separation of Bhairavī and Bhairava.

A desire may be fulfilled, transformed, relinquished, or remain unfulfilled as an external event; none of these by itself determines whether its ground has been recognized.

VII. The Dissolution of Exclusive Duality

अहं त्वमिति भेदे तु क्षेत्रं स्मृत्वा विशेद् बुधः ।
काम्यकामुकभेदे च बालरूपं विचिन्तयेत् ॥

ahaṃ tvam iti bhede tu kṣetraṃ smṛtvā viśed budhaḥ |
kāmyakāmukabhede ca bālarūpaṃ vicintayet ||

भेदं नैव विनाश्येत न कुर्यादेकतां जडाम् ।
भेदस्याप्याभासभावं चिदैक्ये प्रत्यभिज्ञयेत् ॥

bhedaṃ naiva vināśyeta na kuryād ekatāṃ jaḍām |
bhedasyāpy ābhāsabhāvaṃ cidaikye pratyabhijñayet ||

When within the body 'I' and 'other' appear, I return in recognition to the field. When 'desirer' and 'desired' appear, I return to the children.

When 'within me' and 'outside me' appear, I recognize that all these positions arise within one field of manifestation.

I do not erase the two child-forms. I do not force one into the other. I am Bhairava; I am Bhairavī; and I am the field in which their relation appears.

Thus I do not annihilate difference. I dissolve only the claim that difference means absolute separation.

This is the loosening of the knot of duality: bheda remains available to experience, while bheda is recognized as an ābhāsa within non-divided Consciousness.

VIII. Kuṇḍalinī

देहक्षेत्रे परा शक्तिः कुण्डलीभावमाश्रिता ।
नान्या वस्तु स्वतन्त्रा सा चितः स्वातन्त्र्यरूपिणी ॥

dehakṣetre parā śaktiḥ kuṇḍalībhāvam āśritā |
nānyā vastu svatantrā sā citaḥ svātantryarūpiṇī ||

संकोचं देहभावं च मन्त्रं बोधं विकासनम् ।
भैरवः प्रकाशयति स्वप्रकाशस्वरूपतः ॥

saṃkocaṃ dehabhāvaṃ ca mantraṃ bodhaṃ vikāsanam |
bhairavaḥ prakāśayati svaprakāśasvarūpataḥ ||

In embodiment the field continues as my own body. Bhairavī continues as Śakti and is contemplated as Kuṇḍalinī.

Kuṇḍalinī is not a second substance imprisoned inside the body. She is the power of Consciousness appearing according to the conditions of embodiment and capable of recognition in her uncontracted nature.

Bhairava is the awareness illuminating the entire process: contraction, bodily identity, mantra, movement, recognition, and expansion.

Thus field, body, Kuṇḍalinī, awareness, and play belong to one continuum of manifestation.

IX. Dharma and Svabhāva

धृधातोर्धर्मशब्दोऽयं धारणार्थे निरूपितः ।
स्वभावधारणं धर्मं ध्यानेऽस्मिन् परिभावयेत् ॥

dhṛdhātor dharmaśabdo ’yaṃ dhāraṇārthe nirūpitaḥ |
svabhāvadhāraṇaṃ dharmaṃ dhyāne ’smin paribhāvayet ||

नाधर्मो धर्मतां याति शक्तिदृष्ट्या कदाचन ।
संकोचं तु परिज्ञाय स्वभावं पुनराश्रयेत् ॥

nādharmo dharmatāṃ yāti śaktidṛṣṭyā kadācana |
saṃkocaṃ tu parijñāya svabhāvaṃ punar āśrayet ||

I connect dharma with the semantic field of dhṛ: holding, bearing, sustaining, supporting. In this practice, dharma is contemplated as that which supports the recognition and expression of one's deeper nature.

Adharma is not redefined as secretly identical with dharma. Rather, even in contracted movement I seek the Śakti without denying the distinction between contracted and uncontracted expression.

I do not destroy identity. I release its exclusivity. The limited 'I' is returned to the wider ground from which it arose.

Thus returning to svabhāva means recognition, not annihilation.

X. The Names and the Unstainability of Śakti

न किञ्चिच्चित्परं वस्तु सर्वं तस्याः प्रकाशनम् ।
तथापि हिंसया हिंसा धर्मो नैव प्रजायते ॥

na kiñcic citparaṃ vastu sarvaṃ tasyāḥ prakāśanam |
tathāpi hiṃsayā hiṃsā dharmo naiva prajāyate ||

नाम्नां मूलानि पश्येत ध्यानोपायेन साधकः ।
रूढार्थं न परित्यज्य शक्तिं तेषु विचिन्तयेत् ॥

nāmnāṃ mūlāni paśyeta dhyānopāyena sādhakaḥ |
rūḍhārthaṃ na parityajya śaktiṃ teṣu vicintayet ||

The powers appearing through destructive, fearful, painful, or contracted forms are not outside Consciousness. Nothing can stand outside the all-inclusive field of manifestation.

This does not mean that injury becomes non-injury, falsehood becomes truth, or destructive conduct becomes dharma merely through etymological reinterpretation.

In contemplating names such as Adharma, Mṛṣā, Dambha, Māyā, Lobha, Nikṛti, Krodha, Hiṃsā, Kali, Durukti, Mṛtyu, Bhīti, Niraya, and Yātanā, I may examine their linguistic movements as contemplative supports, while preserving their established meanings and ethical or experiential distinctions.

The recognition sought is deeper: the energy by which even contraction appears is Śakti; contraction itself is not thereby declared the uncontracted state.

XI. Preparatory Mantra Practice

भैरवं बालरूपेण मन्त्रकाले विचिन्तयेत् ।
देहं क्षेत्रं विजानीयाद् भैरवीं च पुरःस्थिताम् ॥

bhairavaṃ bālarūpeṇa mantrakāle vicintayet |
dehaṃ kṣetraṃ vijānīyād bhairavīṃ ca puraḥsthitām ||

भैरवीं बालरूपेण पुनर्मन्त्रे विचिन्तयेत् ।
दृष्टिभेदो भवेद् यत्र चिदेकैव प्रतिष्ठिता ॥

bhairavīṃ bālarūpeṇa punar mantre vicintayet |
dṛṣṭibhedo bhaved yatra cidekaiva pratiṣṭhitā ||

1. Baṭuka Bhairava

AUM BATUKA BHAIRAVAAYA NAMAHA

During this mantra I contemplate myself in the child-form of Bhairava. My body is the field. Awareness is luminous and playful, and before me appears the beautiful Bhairavī-form that is never truly outside awareness.

2. Ucchiṣṭa Cāṇḍālinī

AUM NAMO UCCHISTA CHANDALINI VAAGVAADINI RAJMOHINI PRAJAAMOHINI STRIMOHINI AAN AAT YEVE VAYU UCCHISTA CHANDALINI SATYAVAADINI KI SHAKTI KURU SVAAHAA

During this mantra I contemplate myself in the child-form of Bhairavī. The body remains the same field. The apparent change of standpoint occurs within one awareness.

XII. The Five Mental Offerings

भैरवी भैरवं ध्यात्वा पञ्चोपहारमर्पयेत् ।
भैरवो भैरवीं ध्यात्वा मनसैव प्रतिगृह्णीयात् ॥

bhairavī bhairavaṃ dhyātvā pañcopahāram arpayet |
bhairavo bhairavīṃ dhyātvā manasaiva pratigṛhṇīyāt ||

दाताहं ग्राहकोऽहं च क्षेत्रं चाहं तथैव च ।
भेदः पूजाक्रमे तिष्ठेद् वियोगो नास्ति तत्त्वतः ॥

dātāhaṃ grāhako ’haṃ ca kṣetraṃ cāhaṃ tathaiva ca |
bhedaḥ pūjākrame tiṣṭhed viyogo nāsti tattvataḥ ||

The offering takes place at this point of the practice. When I meditate in the form of Bhairavī, I mentally prepare offerings for Bhairava; when I meditate in the form of Bhairava, I receive them from Bhairavī.

The five contemplative offerings retained here are meat, alcohol, sweets, flowers, and fragrance. They are mental offerings in this recension.

As Bhairavī I offer; as Bhairava I receive. Then the standpoint reverses.

The offering does not occur between two absolutely alien beings. I am the one who offers, I am the one who receives, and I am the field in which offering and reception become manifest.

The distinction is ritually preserved; separation is not.

XIII. Main Mantra Stage

मुख्यमन्त्रजपे देहं न त्यजेत् साधकः क्वचित् ।
क्षेत्रभावेन तिष्ठेत चिद्रूपं स्वं विचिन्तयेत् ॥

mukhyamantrajape dehaṃ na tyajet sādhakaḥ kvacit |
kṣetrabhāvena tiṣṭheta cidrūpaṃ svaṃ vicintayet ||

कदाचिद् भैरवो बालः कदाचिद् भैरवी भवेत् ।
दृष्ट्योर्भेदेऽपि चिदेका क्रीडया बहुधा स्थिता ॥

kadācid bhairavo bālaḥ kadācid bhairavī bhavet |
dṛṣṭyor bhede ’pi cidekā krīḍayā bahudhā sthitā ||

1. Ucchiṣṭa Gaṇeśa

AUM HREEM GAM HASTI PISHAACHI LIKHEE SVAAHAA

During this mantra I remain within the wholeness of the body-field.

2. Baṭuka Bhairava Mantra I

AUM HREEM BATUKAAYA AAPADUDDHAARANAAYA KURU KURU BATUKAAYA HREEM

3. Baṭuka Bhairava Mantra II

AUM KLEEM VEEM RUUM DHRUM GHNEEM HREEM BATUKA BHAIRAVAAYA NAMAHA SVAAHAA

In the main stage I do not leave the body. As body I am the field; as consciousness I recognize Bhairava and Bhairavī as inseparable aspects of one awareness.

At times I occupy one child-standpoint, at times the other. At times the children face one another; at times one follows the other.

The original mood of the field is not deficiency. It is the freedom of fullness to appear as relation, movement, differentiation, and return.

XIV. Dhāraṇā of the Lake

सरस्यां पद्ममुद्दिश्य देहबीजानि भावयेत् ।
अव्यक्तानि स्थितान्यत्र शक्तिक्रीडाविकासिनि ॥

sarasyāṃ padmam uddiśya dehabījāni bhāvayet |
avyaktāni sthitāny atra śaktikrīḍāvikāsini ||

जले व्योम यथा भाति न दूरं नापि तन्मयम् ।
भेदाभेदौ तथा ध्यायेत् स्वदेहे चिदधिष्ठितौ ॥

jale vyoma yathā bhāti na dūraṃ nāpi tanmayam |
bhedābhedau tathā dhyāyet svadehe cidadhiṣṭhitau ||

I go to the lake on the right side of the field and contemplate the closed lotuses. Within them lie the latent possibilities of embodied manifestation.

The sky is reflected in the water. The water does not travel to another realm in order to obtain the sky, nor does the sky become water. Difference and non-separation are simultaneously contemplated.

I experience my body in the same way: not as an alien prison to be abandoned, but as a manifestation whose deeper nature can be recognized.

I return not to another place, but to a deeper recognition of this very field of experience.

XV. Final Dhāraṇā

क्षेत्रोऽहं देहरूपेण बालौ चित्तस्य रूपिणौ ।
भैरवोऽहं भैरवी चाहं क्रीडैवाहं निरन्तरम् ॥

kṣetro ’haṃ deharūpeṇa bālau cittasya rūpiṇau |
bhairavo ’haṃ bhairavī cāhaṃ krīḍaivāhaṃ nirantaram ||

As body I am the field. The two children are forms appearing within Consciousness. I am Bhairava; I am Bhairavī; I am their ceaseless play.

कामस्य मूलमानन्दं ज्ञात्वेच्छाशक्तिरूपतः ।
द्वैतग्रन्थिं विलाप्याहं स्वभावं प्रत्यभिज्ञये ॥

kāmasya mūlam ānandaṃ jñātvecchāśaktirūpataḥ |
dvaitagranthiṃ vilāpyāhaṃ svabhāvaṃ pratyabhijñaye ||

Knowing the root of desire as bliss and recognizing it as the power of willing, I dissolve the knot of exclusive duality and recognize my own nature.

I do not annihilate bodily identity. I recognize it as a limited standpoint within a greater field of awareness.

I do not demand that the world conform to every contracted desire as proof of realization. I recognize the fullness from which the power of desire arises.

I remain in this body. I meditate in this body. Whatever fulfillment, transformation, action, or relinquishment follows is received within the freedom of Consciousness.

XVI. The Swan Returning to the Lake

अभ्यासफलसम्पत्तौ हंसरूपेण मे मनः ।
स्वह्रदं पुनरायाति यत्र तस्य निकेतनम् ॥

abhyāsaphalasampattau haṃsarūpeṇa me manaḥ |
svahradaṃ punar āyāti yatra tasya niketanam ||

When the fruit of practice ripens, my mind, contemplated in the form of a swan, returns to its own lake, its dwelling.

सृष्टीन् ब्रह्म च लङ्घित्वा हृष्टो हंसोऽवरोहति ।
ह्रदस्य सलिले रम्ये स्वस्थानं पुनराश्रितः ॥

sṛṣṭīn brahma ca laṅghitvā hṛṣṭo haṃso ’varohati |
hradasya salile ramye svasthānaṃ punar āśritaḥ ||

Passing in contemplation beyond the worlds and conceptual absolutes, the joyful swan descends upon the beautiful water of the lake and rests again in its own place.

The swan is not an entity escaping creation. It is a contemplative image of recognition: awareness ceases to seek itself elsewhere and recognizes its own field as the place of manifestation.

XVII. Bhairava Questions Bhairavī

भैरवीं प्रति देवेशः प्रोवाचेदं ततो वचः ।
भैरवि ब्रूहि मेऽद्य त्वं क्षेत्रं कुत्र प्रतिष्ठितम् ॥

bhairavīṃ prati deveśaḥ provācedaṃ tato vacaḥ |
bhairavi brūhi me ’dya tvaṃ kṣetraṃ kutra pratiṣṭhitam ||

Then Bhairava addressed Bhairavī: Tell me now, Bhairavī: where is the field established?

कौ तौ बालौ च तत्रैव नित्यं क्रीडापरायणौ ।
कामः कुत्र समुद्भूतः कुत्र चैव निवर्तते ॥

kau tau bālau ca tatraiva nityaṃ krīḍāparāyaṇau |
kāmaḥ kutra samudbhūtaḥ kutra caiva nivartate ||

Who are the two children devoted to play within it? Where does desire arise, and into what does it return?

द्वैतग्रन्थौ विलीनायां का त्वं भैरवि मे वद ।

dvaitagranthau vilīnāyāṃ kā tvaṃ bhairavi me vada |

When the knot of exclusive duality has dissolved, who are you, Bhairavī?

भैरव्युवाच — Bhairavī’s Recognition

क्रीडाहं ध्यानरूपाहं साधकोऽहं तथैव च ।
क्षेत्रं चाहं मन्त्रनादो ध्यानस्य फलमेव च ॥

krīḍāhaṃ dhyānarūpāhaṃ sādhako ’haṃ tathaiva ca |
kṣetraṃ cāhaṃ mantranādo dhyānasya phalam eva ca ||

I am the play, the form of meditation, and the practitioner. I am the field, the sound of mantra, and the fruit of meditation.

प्रकाशोऽहं विमर्शोऽहं स्वातन्त्र्यं चिद्रसोऽप्यहम् ।
कुण्डलीभावमापन्ना देहे शक्तिरहं स्थिता ॥

prakāśo ’haṃ vimarśo ’haṃ svātantryaṃ cidraso ’py aham |
kuṇḍalībhāvam āpannā dehe śaktir ahaṃ sthitā ||

I am luminous awareness and its self-apprehending power; I am freedom and the rasa of Consciousness. Assuming the mode called Kuṇḍalinī, I abide in the body as Śakti.

भैरवोऽहं भैरवी चाहं भेदाभेदविवर्जिता ।
स्वभावं प्रत्यभिज्ञाय नित्योदितसुखात्मिका ॥

bhairavo ’haṃ bhairavī cāhaṃ bhedābhedavivarjitā |
svabhāvaṃ pratyabhijñāya nityoditasukhātmikā ||

I am Bhairava and I am Bhairavī, beyond the limitation of either absolute difference or featureless identity. Recognizing my own nature, I am the ever-arising fullness of bliss.

क्रीडानन्दस्य नित्यं वै विचित्ररूपिणी स्थिता ।
इत्यद्वैतस्वातन्त्र्यविज्ञानतन्त्रम् ॥

krīḍānandasya nityaṃ vai vicitrarūpiṇī sthitā |
ity advaita-svātantrya-vijñāna-tantram ||

I abide eternally as the manifold forms of the bliss of play. Thus ends the Advaita-svātantrya-vijñāna-tantram.

XVIII. Etymological Appendix — Sanskrit Verses, IAST, and English

Dharma

Root: dhṛ

English: to hold, bear, sustain, support. In the meditation: that which bears or supports its own nature.

Adharma

Root: a- + dharma

English: the privative prefix a- + dharma. In the source text: that which has lost its own nature.

Mṛṣā

Root: mṛṣ

English: forbearance, endurance, permission; allowing something to take place. Used here as a contemplative semantic association.

Dambha

Root: dambh

English: assumption of a particular behavior or appearance.

Māyā

Root: mā

English: measuring, apportioning, creating, projecting.

Lobha

Root: lubh

English: attraction, desire, strong orientation. 

Nikṛti

Root: ni- + kṛ

English: ni-: downwardness, inwardness, placement or fixing; kṛ: doing, making, creating, performing. A morphological contemplation retained from the original text.

Krodha

Root: krudh

English: agitation, boiling up. 

Hiṃsā

Root: hiṃs

English: striking, injury, wounding; alteration of integrity. 

Kali

Root: kal

English: counting, measuring, ordering, calculation. 

Related semantic field in the source: kāla, kalpa, kalpanā.

Durukti

Root: dur-/dus- + ukti

English: dur-/dus-: difficulty or obstruction; ukti: utterance, expression.

Mṛtyu

Root: mṛ

English: passing away, cessation, dissolution, transformation. 

Bhīti / Bhaya

Root: bhī

English: trembling, being shaken, withdrawal. In bodily experience: trembling, defensive reflex, readiness.

Niraya

Root: nir- + ay

English: nir-: moving away/outward/departure; ay: going, movement, progression. 

Yātanā

Root: yā / tan

English: yā: going, proceeding, wandering, flowing; tan: extending, stretching, spreading, manifesting; tanū: bodily extension. 

Bhairava

Root: bhī + rava

English: bhī: trembling/bodily response; rava: sound, resonance, vibration.


r/KashmirShaivism 7d ago

Content – Living Tradition About the book Saraswat Kundalini Mahayog

5 Upvotes

Has anyone studied Dr. Jitendra Chandra Bharatiya or his book Saraswat Kundalini Mahayog?

There are many stories around him and the book.

I'm trying to learn more about him—his spiritual lineage (parampara), guru, tradition and the path he followed (like Kundalini, Tantra, Yoga, Vedanta, Kashmir Shaivism, etc.). I'd also love to know how his teachings are viewed by practitioners and whether his book reflects any particular lineage or school.

Any insights or reliable sources would be greatly appreciated.


r/KashmirShaivism 7d ago

Question – General According to Kashmir Shaivism, can I manifest my reality while I'm in the body, like the "Law of Attraction" proclaims?

11 Upvotes

I think you might have heard of the "Law of Attraction" where we attract circumstances according to what we believe or feel. If I'm poor, it's because I'm not mentally aligned with thoughts of abundance. If I'm sick, it's because my mind is too anxious, resentful or angry and my body reflects my inner thoughts. Of course, others say that simply changing my attitude is what causes me to have a more positive look on Life and it's not that impressive. But still, I wonder about the possibilities...

According to KS, do we really have the power to affect and change our fate; in a way that even biologists or physicists get stumped? For example, what if I have an illness like cancer or hiv? If I have the realization that I Am Shiva, can I cure my body?


r/KashmirShaivism 8d ago

Question – General Considering PHD on Kashmiri Shaivism and it’s relevance to modern education

6 Upvotes

Namaskar, I wanted to seek your perspective on something. I am considering pursuing my PhD on Kashmiri Shaivism, with the broader objective of studying its philosophy extensively and exploring a possible roadmap for its meaningful inclusion in higher-education curricula.
In particular, I am interested in examining whether its philosophical principles can be translated into academically relevant educational content related to value education, self-awareness, critical reflection, and holistic development.
However, I am conscious of the academic challenges involved. I would want to maintain complete academic neutrality and study Kashmiri Shaivism as a philosophical and educational tradition rather than as a religious or ritualistic practice. I am interested in understanding whether its concepts and textual sources can genuinely be developed into a structured, age-appropriate and academically defensible curriculum with contemporary educational relevance.
I would sincerely appreciate your honest opinion on:
1. Whether this is a viable and sufficiently original direction for PhD research.
2. What major academic or methodological challenges I should anticipate.
3. Whether Kashmiri Shaivism can realistically be positioned within contemporary education without compromising its philosophical essence or academic neutrality.
Any suggestions regarding possible research directions, literature, or scholars working in this area would also be greatly appreciated.
Criticism is most welcomed


r/KashmirShaivism 7d ago

Question – General "You cannot know the Light without Darkness. You cannot know heat without cold." That is what some spiritual teachers preached. Is this why we suffer? Is this the view of KS?

1 Upvotes

I've read the stories of the Nanjing Massacre and the Korean genocide by Japan during World War 2. It was horrific to read. Does Shiva NEED to experience these atrocities in order for Him to recognise Himself and be joyful?


r/KashmirShaivism 8d ago

Question – General Can somone give a complete line of reasoning for “why” and “how” consciousness has all its infinite powers from Vimarsha alone?

8 Upvotes

I understand the nature of conciousness is Prakash-Vimarsha, as far as we can describe it at least. What I want to know definitively in order to erase any doubt or confusion for myself is how and why this Vimarsha produces the powers of consciousness.

So far the only way I have been able to completely logically reason why consciousness has power is by an argument of negation where I negate all other possibilities for the source of the world being something apart from consciousness.

However, that can only prove the fact that consciousness has power “by argument of necessity”. I want an affirmative argument from the ground up on how Vimarsha in itself produces the powers. Hopefully without any axioms if possible.


r/KashmirShaivism 8d ago

Question – General Swamiji’s quotes on the Aghora mantra?

5 Upvotes

Does anyone know of a text/compilation of ALL of Swami Lakshmanjoo’s quotes on the Aghora mantra?


r/KashmirShaivism 8d ago

Question – General Is there a record of Swami Lakshman Joo's meeting with J Krishnamurti?

8 Upvotes

I read somewhere that they met.


r/KashmirShaivism 9d ago

Question – General Shiva is Complete Delight. All is Shiva. Then why do l experience ignorance and suffering? That creates a paradox.

12 Upvotes

Shiva is joyful, free and all-knowing. From my understanding, He "contracted" Himself to become us and forgets His own Nature.

But if Shiva is beyond time and space, then there never is a moment where He actually forgets. He is always completely free and He is All of us. Yet here I am, limited and ignorant. How can there be two Shivas; one is ever-free and one who is feeling miserable?

It's hard for me to properly explain my thinking, but this is the best I can do.


r/KashmirShaivism 11d ago

Question – Beginner beginner bhairav sadhana questions

4 Upvotes

1: is it necassary to have a picture of kaalbhairav, or can i just use a lamp instead?

2: my dad uses the temple when i wanna use it so is it ok if i just light a lamp and incense on my desk and recite the kaalabhairavashtakam and chant the mantra in my room?

those are my main 2 questions im a beginner would like to know how to do a beginner daily sadhana to burn away my fears/anxieties etc. feel free to write me a paragraph.


r/KashmirShaivism 12d ago

Question – General Agni Tattva

6 Upvotes

In elementary expositions of the thirty-six tattvas, we are told simply that Rūpa-tanmātra gives rise to Tejas or Agni Mahābhūta. This makes Agni appear to be merely one gross element situated near the end of the process of manifestation.

However, in the Krama exposition we encounter the statement:

योऽयं वह्नेः परं तत्त्वं प्रमातुरिदमेव तत्।

The text further explains the pramātṛ as Agni which consumes the fuel of differentiation.

My difficulty therefore is whether our ordinary explanation of the thirty-six tattvas is too abbreviated. Should we really understand “Tejas/Agni Mahābhūta” merely as physical fire arising from rūpa-tanmātra, or is this only the grossest/objectified expression of a much deeper Agni-tattva?

In other words, does the statement vahneḥ paraṃ tattvam = pramātṛ indicate that Agni has a continuous ontological range—from its supreme form in consciousness down through subtler levels to Tejas Mahābhūta—rather than there being one “Krama Agni” and another unrelated “elemental Agni”?

If so, have simplified presentations of the 36 tattvas preserved the sequence of manifestation while losing much of the actual meaning of each tattva, which may have to be recovered through Vedic, Āgamic and Krama explanations?

Also, in Jaidev Pratyabhijna hridyaam, it seems like the initial discussion on the ontological origin of tattvas, is suddenly diluted when the discussion shifts to mahabhutas. What is missing here


r/KashmirShaivism 14d ago

Content – Living Tradition Must Watch: A Long-Form Interview with Pran Nath Kaul ji, a Living Master of KS

Thumbnail youtube.com
45 Upvotes

This is an interview with Kashmiri Pandit Pran Nath Kaul ji, who grew up as a child in a family steeped in Kashmir Śaivism, being long-time devotees of Swami Lakshmanjoo. He's widely recognized as a living embodiment of the teaching and a true master of our day. You can see the joy, intensity, and depth of understanding in his very mode of being. What a treat!

Please share your comments and questions and reflections here.


r/KashmirShaivism 15d ago

Content – Living Tradition Created something for you

Thumbnail jps-saahil.github.io
15 Upvotes

A Little Context

I’ve been following non-dual philosophies such as Kashmir Shaivism and Advaita Vedanta for quite some time, and for the past two months, I’ve been working on this website as a way to explore and present these ideas.

If you come across any bugs, inconsistencies, or things that could be improved, please don’t hesitate to point them out. I’d genuinely appreciate the feedback.

I’m also reposting this because GitHub was down today, and I didn’t want that to affect your experience with the website.

Thanks for checking it out, and I hope you enjoy exploring it. 🙏


r/KashmirShaivism 15d ago

Question – General Explanation of the Dancing Shiva in light of Kashmir Shaivism

13 Upvotes

Few years ago I read The Doctrine of Vibration by Mark Dyczkowski and I remember reading a passage on the image of the dancing Shiva where every element was explained in light of Kashmir Shaivism. I remember going "woah" when it all clicked.

But years have passed. I cannot easily find that paragraph. I am reading the book again, but it will take time until I find it again for sure. Maybe I read it somewhere else entirely...

Can someone explain it to me in the same fashion please?