r/LocalLLaMA • u/Porespellar • 1h ago
Discussion Fingers crossed for a 122b or really anything above 31b.🤞
What’s y’all’s best guess on parameter size based on these weird-ass names?
r/LocalLLaMA • u/wuqiao • 5d ago
Hi r/LocalLLaMA !
We’re Apodex, the team behind Apodex 1.1, our new model family built to scale agentic intelligence for complex work. We’re excited to be here and answer your questions directly.
Apodex 1.1 is designed around sustained, verifiable progress toward real-world objectives—from reasoning and search to working with files, executing code, recovering from failures, and coordinating multiple agents.
Open models
Apodex 1.1
Apodex 1.0
Alongside Apodex 1.1, we released our open-source agent harness and two papers:
Participants
The AMA will run from 8–11 AM PT today, and we’ll continue monitoring and answering questions over the next 48 hours.
Ask us anything!

r/LocalLLaMA • u/No_Afternoon_4260 • 6d ago
Megathread for discussing the release of GLM-5.3-Flash.
We'll try to clean up future duplicates around the release and point them here.
GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in the GLM-5 series, and the first open-weight release of the glm5_next architecture. Z.ai's pitch: outperforms GLM-5.2 at one-tenth the price while approaching Claude Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks. It introduces:
Glm5NextForConditionalGeneration)Language Model
max_position_embeddings); evaluated at 300K text / 164K visionVision Encoder
Weights
zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash - FP8 (e4m3, dynamic), 62 shards, ~331 GBzai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash-BF16 - BF16, 120 shards, ~640 GBFrom generation_config.json and the eval setup on the model card:
vLLM (official recipe, vLLM 0.27.0+, FlashInfer 0.6.17+ for NoPE sparse MLA, Hopper and newer):
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash \
--tensor-parallel-size 4 \
--kv-cache-dtype fp8 \
--speculative-config '{"method":"mtp","num_speculative_tokens":5}' \
--tool-call-parser glm47 \
--reasoning-parser glm45 \
--enable-auto-tool-choice \
--served-model-name zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash
SGLang: official cookbook has verified configs for H100/H200/B200/B300/GB200/GB300 (TP4/EP4), with adaptive MTP for low-latency and --mm-feature-transport cpu to offload vision features.
Also supported at launch: TokenSpeed, KTransformers (CPU/GPU hybrid tutorial linked below).
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Porespellar • 1h ago
What’s y’all’s best guess on parameter size based on these weird-ass names?
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Terminator857 • 4h ago
Looking at ... some of the new memory architecture. ... I hired my good friend, Seok-Hee Lee, who used to run SK Hynix. ... We are not ready to unfold it.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/insraq • 5h ago
I was browsing HF for small LLMs and run into this model. It does not seem to be a fine tune - the model has its own architecture.
https://huggingface.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.5-1.7B
https://huggingface.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.5-4B
There are 4B/1.7B versions - the benchmark is quite interesting (4B is neck and neck with Qwen 3.5 9B). The HF page claims both models support native 1M context size.
Currently does not run out of the box on llama.cpp - pending this PR: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/27868
They have a custom fork of llama.cpp that works. Anyone has tried this?
Update:
GGUFs (require custom fork for now):
https://huggingface.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.5-1.7B-GGUF
https://huggingface.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Miserable-Dare5090 • 1h ago
Feels like maybe we have one more present left, for Christmas.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/ColorsOfCosmos • 58m ago
Kaitchup just posted results of his benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B for quants from different labs, Q4 to Q1, .
All the details are hidden behind the paywall, but high level result is visible and looks like for people with 16GB cards UD Q3_K_XL is a winner - it has accuracy of 100% and size is only 12.8GB.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/vini542reddit • 15h ago
Can't wait to test! This should significantly boost TPS!
Now we just need more llama cpp optimizations to be merged in!
Edit:
For anyone who wants to test this: https://github.com/unslothai/llama.cpp/pull/144/changes
More info: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF/blob/main/MTP/README.md
r/LocalLLaMA • u/legolad • 4h ago
Hello all you smarter people. I recently retired and have taken on a task that is going to stretch me a bit.
TL;DR My aging aunt is going blind and wants to keep writing stories that she's been writing for over 70 years. I think local AI has the ability to make this possible but I'm looking for a little guidance on the steps and the order.
FULL VERSION
My aunt is 85 and lives with me now. She has written over 150 stories in her lifetime. They are mostly detective fiction and old west outlaw fiction. She also has macular degeneration that has taken most of her eyesight. She has given up on everything else she used to do, but she still writes and edits her own stories. Lately she has talked about quitting this too because it's just too hard to keep writing even with a giant screen and high-contrast tools.
After some discussion she agreed to try an interactive AI tool of some kind. I picked up a new desktop with an RTX 5080 (16gbVRAM) and 32 GB RAM.
I got Unsloth desktop installed this weekend and I grabbed Gemma4 as my first model.
But now I think I may be woefully out of my depth.
I've mostly only written prompts for existing online models before. I've never actually started from scratch like this and I'm not sure how much prep I need to do before I start interacting with the model. There are a ton of videos and articles about running AI locally, but it's not easy for me to figure out which ones I can trust or which steps apply to me. I would really appreciate a link to a guide for total newbs like me.
The use cases seem pretty simple to me:
Here is the approach I was thinking I would follow, but after looking through all the Unsloth features I'm not sure how many steps I'm missing.
My instructions cover a LOT.
- Brief description of my aunt and her writing goals and style.
- Outline of her work (the types of stories and any connections).
- Location of her existing stories.
- Description of the AI's role and its primary tasks including definitions of terms.
- A set of detailed rules to be followed when helping her edit.
But I still have so many questions:
- Do I need to create an unsloth project for this?
- What's the best way to have the model listen to voice inputs from my aunt?
- What's the best way to set up the model so it always listens for her input (kind of like an Alexa)?
- How can I have it keep a log of all its work and make backups of files before it makes changes? (similar to how Google Docs keeps a revision history and allows you to go back and grab an older version of a file)
Any insights folks want to share or resources you want to point me to would be most welcome. Thanks!
r/LocalLLaMA • u/po_stulate • 4h ago
I kept seeing guys in this sub saying how AtomicChat's Qwen3.8-Flash-Next quant is so good, fits in their machine when unsloth's can't, runs faster than other quants etc, so I went check out what's happening there.
First thing I noticed was that AtomicChat's Q4_K_M quant is suspiciously small when the ngram table is removed (only ~56GB), it seems like most of the tensors in this quant are IQ2_S instead of the usual Q4_K, Q5_K and Q6_K that you usually find in Q4_K_M quants, the GGUF filetype metadata also says IQ2_S instead of Q4_K_M. In their model card, their Q4_K_M also has suspiciously high KLD (0.084).
It seems pretty obvious to me that they're pretending a IQ2_S quant as a Q4_K_M, but at the same time I'm genuinely not sure because it can't be only me who found this right? How can nobody be pointing this out? Am I missing something or what may they be doing?
Their HF repo ID: AtomicChat/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF
r/LocalLLaMA • u/iamMess • 8h ago
Yoyo
I'm back with updates to the fastest inference engine with minimal quality loss for Qwen3.8-27B.
The last few weeks I've been optimizing decode speed and I don't think it can be pushed further, until a newer/better drafter is invented.
So I focused on prefill, which I this morning was around 1.300 per second at 4k and now is just below 2.000.
The main improvement came from a custom kernel, which matches the quality of fp32 with 0.99997 similarity at int8.
Try all of the improvements here:
https://github.com/syv-ai/qwen38-27b-rtx3090
r/LocalLLaMA • u/zannix • 9h ago
I am absolutely blown away. Yes my setup is crap but the fact that it managed to do this in a single take is unbelievable (and I'm a developer).
Hardware used:
- Windows PC with 4070ti (12GB VRAM, 32GB RAM)
- Macbook M5 Air (LLAMA.cpp RPC connection to Windows PC)
Software used:
- LLAMA.cpp (Q4KM, xhigh, 8bit KV, MTP=1)
- Lmstudio Qwen 3.8 27b (Q4KM) GGUF
- Deepseek harness (mode: minimal)
Prompt: "please create a fully self-contained super mario game with only one short level, put everything inside mario.html inside the current directory"
context: 64k
thinking: xhigh
time took: 117 minutes
avg tps: 7.6
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Ne00n • 28m ago
No seriously, I kinda like it.
You have something to solve, you put it.
You know its gonna take like 20 mins to cook.
Every search adds another 30 minutes.
Yes I could boot up my debian on my gaming rig, run the same model at 10t/s + but why?
I rather let the poor server without GPU burn and run the same model at 2t/s and chill.
Its great, I love it.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Unstable_Llama • 13h ago
More new massive updates from turboderp:
- CPU offload of MoE experts
- Qwen-3.8-Flash-Next ngram disk offload
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- New self-calibrated optimization technique
- Countless other optimizations and improvements
If you have an NVIDIA card and haven't tried it lately, you might be missing out.
The attached cat image was made with Qwen-3.8-Flash-Next-3.05bpw-exl3 and this prompt:
Create a detailed SVG image of a cute kitten riding a magic turtle into space.
Come join the crew at the exllama discord
More frequent news on the exllama sub
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Mysterious_Hearing14 • 4h ago
thats how deepresearch should look like nowdays
r/LocalLLaMA • u/dangerous_inference • 3h ago
I only started using some vLLM forks recently in a 4 x 48GB 4090 system.
DS4F - ~5000pp/180tg (DSpark)
Qwen3.8 Flash next - ~7500pp/135tg (MTP)
This is amazing, like having the API in my house. But it's also really hard to go back.
It's weird that we never come close to prefill numbers like this in llama.cpp or ik_llama. The narrative is that vLLM is around the same speed for single requests, but that is clearly not true.
There must some HUGE difference that constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to achieving such speeds in llama.cpp and many other inference engines. Does anyone know exactly what it is?
edit: These results are from my benchmark script that actually times the response, not the vLLM log. And they are not cache hits. My benchmark script deliberately busts cache. Actual cache hits, which I also measure, are like 20k-100k+.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/perelmanych • 8h ago
If you are thinking what model will fit best your HW specs and tasks you are doing here is one table with all currently popular models that still can be considered as local.
| Feature | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8-27B | Opus-4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total parameters | ≈285B | 284B | 125B | 320B | 27B | not published |
| Active parameters | 13B | 13B | 6B | 18B | 27B | not published |
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8-27B | Opus-4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.1 | 83.9 | 82.7 | – | 82.6 | 73.0 | 85.0 |
| NL2Repo | 57.7 | 54.2 | 48.1 | 52.1 | 42.3 | 69.7 |
| DeepSWE | 59.3 | 54.4 | 58.7 | 61.1 | 42.2 | 58.0 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | 75.9 | 70.3 | 73.5 | 72.1 | – | 76.2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | 27.3 | 25.2⁷ | 24.3 | 28.1 | 20.4 | 25.7 |
| AutomationBench (Public) | 25.7 | 25.1 | – | 25.3 | – | 27.2 |
| GDPval-AA v2 | – | 68.1 | – | 72.3 | – | 75.1 |
| Cybergym | 75.3 | 76.7 | – | – | – | 78.3 |
| DSBench-Hard | 63.6 | 59.6 | – | – | – | 71.7 |
| DSBench-FullStack | – | 68.7 | – | – | – | 71.6 |
| ApexBench (Pass@1) | 36.5 | 26.2⁷ | – | – | – | 39.4 |
| HLE with tools (full set) | – | 16.8 | – | 22.9 | – | 25.4 |
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8-27B | Opus-4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro | – | 56.0 | 62.5 | – | 61.7 | 69.2 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | – | – | 81.0 | – | 73.8 | 84.4 |
| CoWorkBench | – | 45.1 | 73.9 | – | 70.7 | – |
| JobBench | – | 41.3 | 55.7 | – | 33.4 | – |
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8-27B | Opus-4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.8 | 91.7 | – | 89.2 | 93.6 |
| HLE (without tools) | – | 33.8 | 35.9 | – | 30.8 | 49.8 |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | – | 90.6 | 91.9 | – | 90.3 | – |
| IFBench | – | 79.2 | 81.3 | – | 79.5 | – |
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8-27B | Opus-4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartography | 64.3 | – | – | – | – | 65.0 |
| ZeroBench (Pass@5) | 35.0 | – | – | – | – | 34.0 |
| BabyVision | – | – | – | 73.0 | 65.7 / 85.6 | 34.1 |
| MathVision | – | – | 90.6 / 95.7 | – | 90.0 / 94.6 | – |
| RealWorldQA | – | – | 88.5 | – | 85.9 | – |
| AndroidWorld | – | – | 84.5 | – | 81.9 | – |
| OSWorld 2.0 (partial credit) | – | – | 52.3 | – | 48.0 | – |
| Vision2Web | – | – | 64.0 | – | 62.9 | – |
| ClawEval-MM (Pass@3) | – | – | 64.4 | – | 57.4 | – |
| RecreationBench | – | – | 49.9 | – | 47.1 | – |
| ERQA | – | – | 72.3 | – | 65.5 | – |
Note: I used GLM-5.3 to compose the table from official HF pages of the models.
Note2: Opus-4.8 results are presented only for illustration and are omitted from selecting the best model in a row.
Upd: Added SWE-bench Pro, SWE-bench Multilingual, GPQA Diamond and HLE (without tools) scores for Opus 4.8 from its System Card.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Significant_Focus134 • 5h ago
Hello!
I've just uploaded a recent checkpoint of my model trained from scratch:
https://huggingface.co/piotr-ai/polanka_3.7b_exp_wip_260901
It was pre-trained, mid-trained, and fine-tuned on a single 4090 over many months. How many tokens? I lost count.
Feel free to use it as a research artefact.
13 languages: PL, EN, ZH, CS, SK, UK, RU, IT, ES, FR, DE, PT, LT — with extra upscaled data for PL/EN/ZH.
r/LocalLLaMA • u/milpster • 6h ago
I posted a new gfx906 based llama.cpp fork a few days ago. One of the main points of critique was that i did not provide sufficient numbers for the gains to be achieved.
--
TL;DR: After switching our Qwen 3.8 27B production setup to DFlash2, several of the old gfx906 optimizations turned out to be neutral or outright regressions. We went back through the existing gfx906 work, isolated the problem areas, reworked the small-Q Flash Attention path and added adaptive native/convert selection.
Against current llama.cpp mainline, the resulting fork is now +14.1% in first-batch PP (379.2 vs 332.3 t/s) and +9.3% in 120k-context fill (252.6 vs 231.1 t/s), while deep-context TG is effectively tied at 13.6 vs 13.5 t/s. DFlash acceptance is identical at 0.691, and deterministic output matches byte-for-byte.
---
Our thread is here:
This is the github for it:
r/LocalLLaMA • u/iwinux • 17h ago
Just to name a few:
I don't understand what they are doing. Am I reading something wrong?
r/LocalLLaMA • u/No-Name-Person111 • 17h ago
r/LocalLLaMA • u/Miserable-Dare5090 • 42m ago
I got the CMP170 cards and unlocked them. I wanted to share my set up for CUDA since maybe it would be useful to others.
First off, I hate e-waste and we are in a special time for RAM. I wanted to have a DIY CUDA box, and I had started by adding additional cards to an old asus predator prebuilt I had around, which also had 64gb DDR5. To add the CMPs I needed more CPU lanes and newegg had some really good deals on CPU/MB/etc combos. Didn’t need a combo with RAM, otherwise I would have gotten it in newegg.
Anyway, I got a cheap case, some noctua fans for the cards, and transferred the memory/ssds. Placed previously owned cards on oculink slots, and used the main x16 for the GPU switch that houses the two CMP170s, so their effective speed is 2x16 across and with the other cards (which are 4x4, and therefore same speed).
Qwen Flash Next, turns out, fits very nicely in these cards. There is also a repository for deepseek, but you’d need at least 3 64GB cards to run it, and with prices rising, it will be hard to justify the gamble of buying ex mining cards for LLMs.
However…so far, these cards are great. Concurrency is good, prompt processing averages 4000 tps on Flash Next, decode is 80+ on a single stream. No MTP added. Third picture shows the 3 models I am now running in this CUDA box (flash next, qwen 27b, gemma 26b).
Anyone else trying out Flash Next on these cards?
r/LocalLLaMA • u/jacek2023 • 11h ago
if you are on Qwen Flash Next make sure to update your build often

merged already (by ServeurpersoCom)
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/27978
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/28011
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/28023
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/28123
merged (by 0cc4m)
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/28032
in progress (by danielhanchen) MERGED NOW
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/27941
MTP in progress
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/27836
more in progress for example
r/LocalLLaMA • u/ChemistNo8486 • 20h ago
Normally, whenever a new model dropped, I always chose the non-vision version just to save VRAM; I though that only use case was when you were the one sending the picture.
However, with the release of QWEN 3.8 27B I decided to give it a shot, and it has been one of the best decisions I have made, as this makes the model way more capable for autonomous coding.
With no vision, the model will try to complete the task and get back to you once it thinks that it is done with no problem. But there are a lot of silent errors that do not get reflected via the code or the tests performed, so you could go back to an error screen or a broken page after getting a confirmation of your request being implemented correctly.
On the other side, when I ask something to QWEN with vision support, it will work on it, and then proactively take a screenshot to confirm if everything is right. This has helped numerous times with spotting errors that were missed. The model will continue to reiterate and take screenshots until it gets a visual confirmation of the issue being fixed. Just magnificent.
Btw, I currently run my local set up via Hermes with QWEN 3.8 27B (Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q5_K_XL.) powered by a 5090.