r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 12d ago

Meme needing explanation What movie reference am I missing

Post image
26.7k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.4k

u/MrCobalt313 12d ago edited 12d ago

Scene from Into the Spider-Verse where Miles gets a 0 on a true/false test and catches on the only statistically possible way he could have done that was if he knew all the right answers and deliberately chose the wrong ones, meaning he's intentionally trying to fail out of the class and quit.

This is, however, a multiple choice test with four possible answers per question, so it's far more possible to get 0 correct answers due to actually being that stupid.

673

u/krakajacks 12d ago

This also happens in The Magicians and some other shows I can't remember that are older than that.

210

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

man that was a weird show.

26

u/cunningham91 12d ago

The books were much better

29

u/Tymareta 12d ago

The books: every woman is described tits first, to the point where we basically know the cup size of every single one and barely learn anything more about them.

The show: the women are actual fully fledged characters, with autonomy, wants, desires and actual storylines.

The show took everything good from the books and cut out all the dross.

15

u/blackestrabbit 12d ago

Idk Olivia Taylor Dudley was very noticeably tits forward.

6

u/WeAteMummies 12d ago

yeah the two biggest reasons to watch this show are both stuffed into Olivia Taylor Dudley's extremely tight sweaters

3

u/jchaffer 12d ago

Tits backward would be a wild choice, tbf

1

u/blackestrabbit 12d ago

I've seen it, unfortunately.

1

u/HungryGlizzyGobbler 12d ago

Lmao, I Googled her to see if I recognize her. Pretty much every image on the first page result was porn. Jesus.

1

u/LordFardiness 12d ago

Her most recent movie was Touch Me where she has sex with an alien squid.

1

u/blackestrabbit 11d ago

Her and Tony Shalhoub should start a club!

1

u/JJ668 12d ago

Fam did NOT read book two.

2

u/Tymareta 12d ago

I read the whole series, it improved a little but the women were still relegated to sex objects or motivation for the men.

1

u/JJ668 12d ago

I really doubt you did. Literally half the second book is from Julia's perspective, in which practically every man in it is irrelevant.

1

u/Tymareta 11d ago

Think whatever you want, but I'll just ask, how did Julia's story end, and who did it ultimately end up serving?

1

u/JJ668 11d ago

Tl;dr, just read the bottom paragraph. It's a book, it's kind of hard to prove my point unless I cover the plot.

It ended with her ascension to godhood how does that serve Quentin or any other male character. Quintin is not privy to like 90% of what she went through.

His lesson in that book also does not stem from her in any way. His lesson is that "The hero is not rewarded, the hero pays the price." His series arc is about how magic will not solve his problems.

Her arc is about the need to be special, addiction, and learning to live with the trauma she's endured. It is clearly meant to be a commentary on what women go through and how men (Quentin) view their pain as a alluring quirk rather than the truly horrific thing it is.

From Quentin's perspective, she's this ethereal despondent character but her own perspective is far more gritty and real. She practically tells him nothing about her thoughts and feelings and her arc ends with her accepting the trauma as a part of her, and that this horrific event doesn't need control the rest of her life.

It's about overcoming the trauma she endures and how in order to move past it, you sometimes have to grow and change to make space for the trauma, represented in her ascension. This quite literally cannot be in service of Quentin's growth, because he does not have a traumatic event on the same level as Julia to apply this lesson to. Her ENTIRE HALF of the book is about her overcoming that. That's why I either think you didn't read it, or you somehow didn't understand how a character with just as much narrative weight in the story had her own growth unrelated to a man.

1

u/BriscoCounty-Sr 12d ago

Yeah when that one girl ascended to literal godhood in not-Narnia it really was motivating for the men to uh….. idk exist I guess.

1

u/MapsOverCoffee22 12d ago

It's been a really long time since I read them, but that was not my impression at all. It actually seemed to me like the women were the fully written out characters with wants and desires, who uncovered truths, while the main protagonist was mostly depressed and along for the ride because he had actually read the books and wanted to help his friends.

1

u/MapsOverCoffee22 12d ago

I heard this in Margot's voice.

10

u/cleveruniquename7769 12d ago

The Magicians is the only book series where I will unequivocally say that the show/movie was better than the book. Every change they made for the show was the right decision. 

1

u/turtlebarber 12d ago

They were just different timelines

1

u/MapsOverCoffee22 12d ago

I honestly love both the books and the show. That approach of different timelines was excellent.

1

u/turtlebarber 12d ago

Same. I rewatch the show way more than rereading the books. But they both offered different stories that I genuinely enjoyed. The character growth of the show was just unmatched though

1

u/MapsOverCoffee22 12d ago

As far as for the intention of adapting it, yes. I always hold it up as a great example of adapting the spirit of a story over trying to recreate scene for scene.

But I love both.

8

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

I would read them; but I am clinically illiterate

13

u/capincus 12d ago

They got professionals that'll read the book for you nowadays.

1

u/Honest_Roo 12d ago

Audio books are great and the local library likely has an extensive e-library. (Libby app)

-1

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

which part of clinically illiterate did you misunderstand?

8

u/capincus 12d ago

All of it, kinda judgy for a guy who also can't read there.

1

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

Yes, I am a bad person

3

u/BackgroundRate1825 12d ago

This is a weird site to be on for someone claiming illiteracy. That's usually reserved for short form video content.

2

u/Small_Distribution17 12d ago

Then you’d love the Stormlight Archives on Audible!

2

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

This reads as an insult to the Stormlight Archive; is this the case?

2

u/Small_Distribution17 12d ago

it was not an insult! it was a reference to how good Vorin men don't read.

1

u/ClassicDefiant2659 12d ago

Right?!

I know it's overrated really. But imma still listen to all 600 hours again.

1

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

600 hours!? wtf how

2

u/KolgrimLang 12d ago

Don't worry, the first book was one of the most boring things I've read in my entire life, so you didn't miss anything.

1

u/Button-Down-Shoes 12d ago

But, could you get 0 out of 100 on a multiple-choice test? And, how are you even able to answer this question?

3

u/Wonderful_Example742 12d ago

Yes, depending on what the test was on. For example, if it was reading, i could. But if it were, say, math, I also would be able to get 0.

0

u/tryingisbetter 12d ago

Audiobooks. The show actually makes no sense because they had to kill the main character in the show before it was supposed to end.

3

u/Simple_Wrongdoer_233 12d ago

Then the show must have been spectacularly bad because I read the books and… yeah

5

u/thatshygirl06 12d ago

He has no idea what he's talking about. The show is way better than the books.

1

u/TerrorTown77 12d ago

He just wants to let people know he reads book.

0

u/Thuraash 12d ago

The show did get pretty spectacularly bad. I eventually ragequit because I couldn't stand the so-called protagonist.

1

u/Simple_Wrongdoer_233 12d ago

Tbh I did the same thing with the books, which is why I never checked out the show. Like, I enjoy stories with a protagonist who is not in fact objectively a heroic figure in the narrative, but that one just took it a little too far in making him so completely unlikeable 😅

1

u/thatshygirl06 12d ago

He's better in the show compared to the books, though he does start annoying. He goes through character development and gets better though.

3

u/Virtual-Pride3661 12d ago

I fully disagree I thought the books had really flat characters. I much preferred the show. 

1

u/Namisaur 12d ago

Maybe I’ll try it someday but I really wanted to like the TV show…however Quentin’s personality on screen was too obnoxious and frustrating

1

u/nhalliday 12d ago

The books are very different plotwise, they essentially don't follow the same story at all besides hitting a few of the same notes. Also for some reason they swapped Penny and Quentin's personalities in the show? That said I loved the show despite its flaws and the books were alright too.

1

u/KidenStormsoarer 12d ago

honestly, could barely finish book 1, it was WEIRD. so creepy.

1

u/mxzf 12d ago

I haven't read the book, I just watched the first season of the show, but I heard someone describing the author of the books as being upset that Chronicles of Narnia was so popular despite having unrealistically positive outcomes for the character and wanting to make a "similar, but bad stuff happens to people instead" version, which kinda made sense about the tone of the material.

1

u/KidenStormsoarer 12d ago

... everybody dies in chronicles of Narnia

2

u/mxzf 12d ago

IIRC they die ... and are resurrected to live in Narnia for forever. It's an allegory for Heaven and is a positive ending for a character.

1

u/KidenStormsoarer 12d ago

ah, but only 3 of the 4 did. susan was no longer a friend of narnia and went to narnia hell. not sure i'd call that a positive ending for any of them.

1

u/thatshygirl06 12d ago

You're the first person I've seen say that. All the other book readers either say theyre both good or the show is better.

1

u/TerrorTown77 12d ago

No they weren't. I tried reading the first one. It was a bland snoozefest. The tv show added way more personality into the story.