On 26 November 2015, Mallikarjun Kharge had told the Indian Parliament that India’s upper castes were outsiders and infiltrators.

He had said, “We are the original Indians. You are Aryans, meaning the upper castes came from outside. You are not from India. You are not Indians.”

Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi is saying that if the Congress comes to power, it will implement 80% reservation in private companies.

For the upper castes, private companies have so far been the biggest avenue through which they have been able to earn their livelihood.

Yet the upper-caste population wants to teach Modi a lesson - not the people who want to destroy their prospects; not those who want to turn them into beggars; not those who call them outsiders; and not those who want to strip them of all the rights that come with being an Indian.

There's a fascinating tug of war between supporters of Varnashrama Dharma (Dharma to be followed under normal peace and orderly circumstances), and Apad Dharma (Dharma to be followed under calamitous circumstances).

Modi suggests one should behave as if there's peace and order. The more we behave as if there's peace, it will engender more peace.

The more we behave as if there's war, it will produce more conflict.

Things become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you prepare for the worst, you would precipitate the worst. If you prepare for the better, you would precipitate the better.

There's a debate in Mahabharata regarding the dharma under normal circumstances, i.e., Varnashrama Dharma, and dharma under calamitous circumstances, i.e., Apad Dharma.

Traditional Hindu scholars have emhpasised that people must avoid Apad Dharma because it's part of Mahabharata and if people keep Mahabharata in their homes, then they create war like situations in their homes.

But then there are others who point out that Apad Dharma is in actually the bigger of the two parvas in MB, viz., the Shanti Parva, with the other being Yuddha Parva. Satya P. Agarwal suggests that Apad Dharma is part of the peace making process and also suggests that Apad Dharma is a better framework to conduct oneself during calamitous scenarios.

Hindus need to first understand whether this land was Waqf donation? If so, then Muslims can claim it back anytime.

Tomorrow, they might exploit by taking over the temple, even demolishing it, by stating that it's a Waqf land.

Then they might use this as an example to destroy all other temples stating those temples were also similarly based on Waqf donation.

If any Hindu community wants to accept any such donation, they should explicitly ensure it through a gift-deed where in it is clearly stated that the donated land is not waqf property.

Why Khalistani propaganda is disinfo?

Khalistanis have built up an immigration network whereby they maintain the story of persecution of Sikhs in India in order for them to get easy and convenient visa approvals.

This persecution is a myth because the 1984 anti-Sikh riots were political and not religious. They were a result of two terrorists assassinating Indian PM, Mrs. Gandhi.

Those terrorists were part of a revolutionary group actively encouraged by Pakistan's ISI to play divide and rule against Hindu-Sikh brotherhood. Many Hindus also sacrificed their lives.

So certainly, there is no anti-Sikh hatred in India, or persecution of Sikhs, or some kind of genocide going against them. Anything that suggests so is engaging in disinformation. That makes any Khalistani agitation an exercise in disinfo.