r/ProgrammerHumor 17h ago

Meme iHateThisPassiveAgressiveBehaviourRuby

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

264 comments sorted by

View all comments

422

u/deceze 17h ago

It's been a while since I've touched Ruby, but I think the stance was that only false and nil should be falsey? Which is not an unreasonable stance to take. The fewer falsey values, the easier it is to predict the behaviour. It's just surprising when coming from other languages.

Just off the top of my head, PHP treats "0", that is, specifically a string with a single zero, as falsey. Which has clearly gone too far to the other extreme.

59

u/Bomaruto 16h ago

The reasonable stance is to not let you coerce everything into a boolean.

7

u/suvlub 14h ago

If I may be pedantic, not to coerce without you asking. A language that wouldn't let me simply convert between types sounds annoying

5

u/ntfaw 13h ago

It's not that you couldn't convert between types, it's that it wouldn't be automatic. You would need to actively call toboolean on a value before using it as a boolean, and the idea behind that is that intentionally casting the value leads to fewer mistakes