It's been a while since I've touched Ruby, but I think the stance was that only false and nil should be falsey? Which is not an unreasonable stance to take. The fewer falsey values, the easier it is to predict the behaviour. It's just surprising when coming from other languages.
Just off the top of my head, PHP treats "0", that is, specifically a string with a single zero, as falsey. Which has clearly gone too far to the other extreme.
I never used php, is that behaviour due to it implicitly converting "0" to 0 and as such it is falsey? Or is it straight up "0" the one that is falsey?
Because PHP started as a sprinkle-it-on-your-HTML language, and any form submissions are always text, and 0-from-a-form should still evaluate like 0; or some such hare-brained nonsense reasoning.
The fact that such basic nonsense is still baked into the very core of the language, and can never be removed due to backwards compatibility, means I'll never respect PHP, regardless of how much it's improved over the last decade or so.
430
u/deceze 19h ago
It's been a while since I've touched Ruby, but I think the stance was that only
falseandnilshould be falsey? Which is not an unreasonable stance to take. The fewer falsey values, the easier it is to predict the behaviour. It's just surprising when coming from other languages.Just off the top of my head, PHP treats
"0", that is, specifically a string with a single zero, as falsey. Which has clearly gone too far to the other extreme.