r/PsychologyTalk Feb 09 '26

Mod Post Do not post about your personal life here.

29 Upvotes

I will start banning. Observe subreddit rules.

This space is for talking about general topics in psychology, not your personal situations.


r/PsychologyTalk Mar 15 '25

Mod Post Please do not post about your personal life or ask for help here.

31 Upvotes

There are a lot of subreddits as well as other communities for this. This subreddit is for discussion of psychology, psychological phenomena, news, studies, and topics of study.

If you are curious about a psychological phenomenon you have witnessed, please try to make the post about the phenomenon, not your personal life.

Like this: what might cause someone to behave like X?

Not like this: My friend is always doing X. Why does she do this?

Not only is it inappropriate to speculate on a specific case, but this is not a place for seeking advice or assistance. Word your post objectively and very generally even if you have a particular person in mind please.


r/PsychologyTalk 9h ago

What's the simple thing you stopped doing that changed your life?

22 Upvotes

Most advices are about adding more habits, routines, discipline but some of the biggest shifts comes from stopping something instead of adding.

For example, I stopped explaining myself. In any cases when I needed even a little excuses in front of someone I just leave dialog and go out. I made one rule - no any excuses in any situation for anyone, just leave. Yes it's psychologicaly hard at start but how mind is changing is another way of dofamine felling. Step by step I learned caught my thoughts when wanted to excuse.

What's you stopped doing?


r/PsychologyTalk 5m ago

What psychology experiment stood out to you the most, and why?

Upvotes

For me, it was the Harlow monkey experiment with the wire “mother” vs the cloth-covered/soft “mother.” Not sure exactly why it made such an impression on me- maybe because I had never really thought about the power of love and comfort compared with basic needs like food.


r/PsychologyTalk 10h ago

Can you have BPD with no fear of abandonment?

4 Upvotes

Is it possible to have BPD and no fear of abandonment? Or to have BPD and an avoidant attachment style?


r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

Craziest psychology fact you know?

127 Upvotes

Mine has to be that your brain can tell u lies. This really made me derealise.

Now boggle me with yours!


r/PsychologyTalk 7h ago

What can 100 days in isolation teach us about human psychology? Join our AMA with psychologist and project lead Amelie Therre.

Thumbnail reddit.com
2 Upvotes

Join the AMA and leave your questions here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/space/s/ujUeqWRPJC


r/PsychologyTalk 6h ago

Soul sickness and soul healing

1 Upvotes

Soul sickness and soul healing are concepts frequently mentioned in spiritual and religious texts. However, can these phenomena be scientifically defined and studied? In this paper, we propose a framework for defining soul sickness and soul healing mathematically, drawing on insights from Tao Science and our prior work on the mathematical definition of soul and life. Specifically, we define soul as the quantum information in one’s quantum vibrational field. We introduce the concepts of positive information and negative information. Positive information refers to the connection, order, and harmony within an object or system, while negative information represents disconnection, disorder, and disharmony. Life, in this context, is defined as a system capable of systematically maintaining, developing, and transmitting positive information.

Building on this understanding, we define soul sickness as a state in which a life system experiences a significant increase in negative information and/or a decrease in positive information within its quantum field. Soul sickness is posited as the root cause of all physical, emotional, and spiritual ailments, as well as the challenges and difficulties one encounters in life. Conversely, soul healing is the process of transforming negative information in the quantum field into positive information. By addressing the root cause of sickness and life’s challenges, soul healing offers a profound way to resolve difficulties and elevate life at its deepest level. The paper explores various types of soul sickness, their causes, and multiple soul healing techniques. We also present clinical research and case studies demonstrating the efficacy of soul healing. Our findings suggest that soul healing is urgently needed for individuals, humanity as a whole, and the world at large. Soul healing can be self-administered or performed remotely for others, making it accessible and versatile. These techniques are easy to learn, simple to apply, and pleasant to practice.

They can be integrated into various fields, including medicine, psychiatry, business consulting, and other professions, either as standalone practices or in conjunction with existing healing modalities and medical treatments. By enhancing the efficacy of other treatments, soul healing can improve health, wellness, and overall success in life. In conclusion, soul healing represents a transformative approach to addressing the root causes of sickness and life’s challenges. Its universal applicability and ease of use make it a valuable complement to modern medical practices and other healing modalities, offering a pathway to deeper well-being and harmony.

continued - https://biomedgrid.com/fulltext/volume26/soul-sickness-and-soul-healing-a-quantum-information-based-framework.003473.php#Discussion%20and%20Conclusion


r/PsychologyTalk 7h ago

Is this a common or normal reaction to emotional abuse?

1 Upvotes

If someone was emotionally abused by a supervisor at work on a regular basis for over 10 years, would it be mormal for the victim to develop intense hatred and disgust towards their abuser?

Does this happen often? Is there a name for it?


r/PsychologyTalk 14h ago

Am too damaged to have normal, healthy relationships?

3 Upvotes

Am I seriously too damaged to have normal, healthy relationships?

I’d really like some outside perspective on this situation, because I recently received a message from a friend that made me seriously question whether there is something fundamentally wrong with the way I handle my relationships.

I’m basically someone who is very slow at replying to messages. It’s not that I deliberately ignore people or try to punish them. It just happens that I don’t reply for days, and sometimes even weeks.

I’ve also noticed that when I’m not doing well mentally or emotionally, I tend to disappear even more. I withdraw, stop communicating, and often don’t reply even to people I genuinely love and care about. At those times, I simply don’t have the energy to talk or explain myself. Then, when I feel better, I come back and continue the relationship as normal.

I have several friends where this is actually mutual. One of us might send something, the other person replies a few days later, then one of us disappears again for a few days, and when we talk again, we simply pick up where we left off. We still love and care about each other, we meet up, and we’re there for each other. I’ve always considered this a completely normal way of maintaining a friendship.

However, I recently received this message from a friend, and it really made me think:

“I think I’ve been more than fair. I’ve already tolerated too much from you. I’ve overlooked too many things. I don’t even know if this can be called a relationship anymore. Friendship doesn’t work like this for me. [...] You’re very sweet, and I loved every single minute of our conversations, but I don’t think you’re someone I’m willing to spend my time on again. You’re too damaged, and you project that onto other people. I choose the people I have around me carefully. I think you should practice accepting other people’s decisions. You’re an intelligent person. There’s no anger on my side, I simply don’t want to be friends with you anymore.”

What really hit me was that they didn’t simply say, “This way of communicating doesn’t work for me.” They said that I’m “too damaged,” that I project it onto other people, and that I’m not someone they consider worth spending their time on anymore.

What also makes this situation difficult for me is that when they told me that my communication was a problem for them, I offered to talk it through. I didn’t say, “This is just how I am, deal with it.” I told them that I understood if this was hurting them, and that I was willing to work on it and change.

I also suggested that we actually talk about what each of us needs from a friendship and try to find a way to make those needs compatible.

So my attitude wasn’t that I didn’t care about how they felt. Quite the opposite. I was trying to understand their needs and find a compromise that could work for both of us.

Despite that, they decided that they didn’t want to continue the friendship.

And now I’m wondering whether I really am someone who is fundamentally incapable of having healthy relationships.

Because objectively, I understand that it isn’t necessarily fair to someone if I regularly take days or weeks to respond. I also understand that if regular communication is an important part of friendship for someone, they could easily interpret my silence as meaning that I don’t care about them.

At the same time, for me, a lack of communication doesn’t necessarily mean a lack of attachment or care.

If I love someone and they’re important to me, that doesn’t automatically mean I want to talk to them every day. And when I’m struggling emotionally, I tend to completely withdraw, and at those times I don’t necessarily distinguish between the people who are more or less important to me. I simply withdraw from everyone.

But now I’m wondering whether this is actually a pattern that I need to seriously work on.

Is this genuinely a major relationship problem on my part? Or is it simply that I have a much lower need for communication and should surround myself with people who have similar expectations?

And I’m also wondering: if I recognize that my behavior is a problem for someone, offer to work on it, and suggest that we talk about and negotiate our needs, is that already a healthy way of approaching the situation? Or does the fact that I’ve functioned this way in the past mean that I have a deeper problem with forming and maintaining relationships?

Where is the line between “this is simply how I communicate” and actually neglecting or hurting another person?

Because I can completely accept someone saying:

“This doesn’t work for me in a friendship, so I don’t want to be friends anymore.”

I think that’s completely legitimate.

But whether that automatically means “you’re too damaged to be capable of healthy relationships” is a different question.

What do you think?

Does being someone who tends to disappear, especially when they’re not doing well, and who can go days or weeks without communicating genuinely indicate that they’re too damaged or incapable of healthy relationships — even if they love and care about their friends, enjoy spending time with them, and are willing to talk about it and change when the other person expresses that it’s hurting them?

Or is this simply a communication and coping style that is compatible with some people and not with others?

And please don’t just reassure me. If you think I’m in the wrong here, I genuinely want to hear that too. I’d rather get an honest perspective on how this looks from the outside and what you think I should actually work on.


r/PsychologyTalk 23h ago

are acts of service a valid replacement for an apology

11 Upvotes

not sure if im asking in the right place but ive notice a trend in the people close to me. when there is an argument it ends off on a disagreement but instead of apologizing they do something for me. i appreciate it but it does annoy me. my questions would be is there a name for that reaction, am i justified to feel annoyed even though they are doing something for me, and why do they do that. i personally feel when im wrong i say sorry, if there open to hearing it my reasoning, and try to make up for it and change. just curious, ive been noticing it in more people lately


r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

Can the way we experience other people’s lack of consciousness make us question our own reality?

3 Upvotes

I saw an uncensored photo of a deceased person today, and it unexpectedly sent me down a philosophical rabbit hole.
What disturbed me wasn’t just death itself, but the fact that the person once had a conscious, subjective experience of the world, and now they don’t — while another conscious person can stand there and observe their body.
It made me think about the difference between first-person experience and third-person observation. I experience the world from inside my own consciousness, while other people can only observe me from the outside. How do I know that the reality I experience is actually what I think it is?
Could this kind of experience be related to existential anxiety, self-awareness, or changes in perceived reality? Has this specific phenomenon been studied in psychology?


r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

What do we think about mandatory psychological evaluations for cops?

5 Upvotes

I would like input from this community. I have no education in psychology, so I could be very wrong here.

Where I live, systemic racism, especially from police is very prominent, especially towards indigenous people. We also have serious issues with a toxic police culture and cops aren’t held accountable.

We are having an election soon. The candidate I am backing is open to a program where cops are required to be psychologically evaluated. I don’t know if such a program exists elsewhere. What I am thinking is mandatory weekly evaluations. Cops who refuse to participate or show up
to the session and not try to do the work would be terminated. We might need amendments to labour laws for this and we need to make sure that the community supports such a beneficial but harsh system.

I think incredibly high standards are needed for cops who have such power and authority over us.

What do people here think of this idea and what things should be included in such a program? Are there better ways to accomplish getting rid of systemic racism and corruption in policing from a psychological perspective?


r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

The Confidence Gap: Why Competent People Doubt Themselves Most

Thumbnail gallery
9 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

Modern censorship is more effective when nothing is deleted

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

I think the most effective form of censorship today is not removing information. It is making sure people never encounter it.
In the past, censorship was visible. A book was banned, a newspaper was seized, a recording disappeared. The act of suppression itself often created curiosity.
Now the mechanism can be much quieter.
A post can remain online and still effectively disappear. A search result can exist but never reach the first page. A video can technically be available while being shown to almost nobody. No authority has to announce a ban. No dramatic act of censorship has to take place.
That may be more powerful because the person being suppressed may not even know whether anything happened. They simply conclude that nobody was interested.

And the audience never knows there was something they failed to see.
I’ve been thinking about this while developing “Cassie Hour”, Novel a story told across 1985 and 2020. One of its underlying ideas is that information control changes form over time. In 1985, it could happen through records, access, reputation and people deciding what was allowed to circulate. In 2020, visibility itself can be controlled by ranking systems, recommendation systems and algorithms.

That creates a psychological layer too.
If something you create, say or share consistently fails to reach people, you may eventually interpret that invisibility as a judgment about yourself.
- Maybe you’re not interesting enough.
- Maybe nobody cares.
- Maybe you should stop.
But what if the invisibility was never really about you?
What if a system that controls what gets seen also ends up shaping how people judge their own value?
That is one of the questions behind Cassie Hour.
In the novel, the mystery is not only about what happened in Marbella in 1985. It is also about who controls the version of a story that survives, what gets remembered, what gets buried, and what happens when a name refuses to disappear.
The song does not simply accompany the novel. It becomes part of that question.
If a song exists, is searchable, is legal, and can technically be played, but almost nobody is allowed to encounter it, has it really been censored?
Or has something more sophisticated happened?
My view is that controlling visibility can sometimes be more effective than controlling speech itself.
The strongest censorship system may therefore be one that can honestly say:
“You were never censored. Nobody was interested.”
And perhaps the most dangerous part is what happens next.
You start believing them.


r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

Does having a higher IQ make you less rational? The data

Thumbnail substack.com
0 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

Need advice: I enjoy giving feedback, but even requested criticism causes me deep emotional discomfort (even about simple things I like).

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 1d ago

How do you know when someone is genuinely there for you versus helping you because they feel sorry for you? Can you actually tell the difference? How is empathy different from pity? And how can we understand someone else's intentions without simply assuming what they're feeling

1 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 2d ago

Good Looking People attacked

13 Upvotes

Can someone help me understand the reason “gorgeous” women get attacked for simply refusing to engage a cat-call for example? Same with men Extremely handsome guys get called ugly or gay for simply not engaging or rejecting certain women… ive seen both and ige experienced verbal attacks for simply saying “leave me alone” to women or staying silent…thank you


r/PsychologyTalk 2d ago

Why is there usually no sympathy for people that die from a stupid mistake?

16 Upvotes

I see this a lot on the internet.

Someone dies because they made a mistake.
Sometimes it's really stupid, sometimes not as stupid.
It can range from doing a backflip from their roof onto the windshield of a car and dying from lacerations, to climbing up a steep cliff with no harness and falling to their death, to giving themself a tattoo at home and succumbing to an infection, to taking a picture by a waterfall, losing their footing, falling in and drowning.

Sure it's their fault, they were dumb, they made a mistake.
But the vast majority of people will then make light of them dying and have zero sympathy whatsoever. A lot will find their death funny, even, and seem to think that becuase they made a stupid mistake, they deserve their fate.

Like someone hops into a horse pen to get a video and gets trampled to death when they spook the horses.
All the comments will be about how stupid this person is, FAFO, Darwin Awards, nature weeds out stupidity, etc. They'll be laughing and joking about the person and think it's hilarious.
Not a single one will think "Man... kinda sad that this guy did one dumb thing and it cost him his life just for that."
Instead they're all "What a fucking dumbass LMAO this is true FAFO, real Darwin Awards winner right here LOL! Did us all a favor by removing himself from the gene pool LOL"

This has always grossed me out, and I seem to be in the minority that I don't think it's funny and don't think they deserve to have died from one mistake.

What is the psychology behind this? That if someone dies in a freak accident we should feel sorry for them, but if they make a mistake and die we shouldn't and should instead berate them for their death and find it funny?


r/PsychologyTalk 2d ago

Why does confidence usually improve with experience?

10 Upvotes

Is it mainly because people become less concerned about other people's opinions, or are there other factors?


r/PsychologyTalk 2d ago

What habit changed your life much more than you expected?

6 Upvotes

You know, most advice on self-improvement is all about setting these huge, ambitious goals and mapping out your entire future, but honestly, I've always been way more fascinated by the tiny, almost silly little habits that don't seem like a big deal at first, and then somewhere down the line you look back and realize they completely shifted something fundamental in your life, whether it's your mindset, your relationships, or just the way you move through the world, and the craziest part is how such small actions can end up creating such wildly disproportionate results. So I'm genuinely curious—what's that one thing for you, that one small routine or ritual you picked up almost on a whim, that ended up becoming a total game changer without you even seeing it coming?


r/PsychologyTalk 3d ago

Why do some people become defensive or dismissive when presented with abstract or "what if" scenarios in conversation?

15 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 3d ago

What type of psychology are you most interested in? And why?

19 Upvotes

r/PsychologyTalk 2d ago

Is Interdependence the Same as People Pleasing? How Do Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals Shape Morality and Relationships?

1 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to understand independent versus interdependent self-construal beyond just the textbook definitions.

If interdependent people are motivated to maintain harmony and avoid burdening others, could that sometimes be mistaken for people pleasing? How do psychologists distinguish between a healthy interdependent orientation and someone who struggles to set boundaries?

Similarly, if independent cultures encourage expressing your own needs and preferences, how do people maintain a strong sense of morality and consideration for others? Is morality shaped differently in independent and interdependent cultures, or is it simply expressed differently?

I'd love to hear other people's thoughts because this topic has made me question whether one approach is actually "better," or whether they're both adaptive in different cultural contexts.