r/SPEEA • u/MysteriousAffect3903 • 5d ago
CEO Webcast
Just curious what people thought of the CEO webcast yesterday and how he addressed the union contracts negotiations. He seemed much more congenial than Ben's email last Friday. Is this part of the game, good cop, bad cop? Or was he genuine in wanting to work with the union to find something that works for both sides?
19
u/Alternative_Heron_59 5d ago
Let's hope we get a 2nd offer soon.
-min 6% 2026 retroactive raise
-100 RSU
-bump up guarantee raises by 3%
5
12
u/Think-Gap602 5d ago edited 5d ago
SPEEA is roughly 10% of the workforce. I suspect that is big enough that Kelly is providing some direct "oversight" to the negotiations.
17
8
u/Zestyclose_Price_441 5d ago
That 10% is the only reason Boeing can release the new airplanes. SPEEA has the bull by that balls.
1
u/Poppin_Tags6738 3d ago
And with that attitude it's exactly why the bull is going to do everything it can to move away from SPEEA.
2
u/Zestyclose_Price_441 3d ago
sounds like you’re from Enumclaw with how familiar you are with livestock lol
2
1
u/777978Xops 4d ago
It’s less about the size and more about if he doesn’t get the 777-9 certified by the end of this year, the compensation Boeing will be paying will NOT be funny
1
u/Think-Gap602 4d ago
the 777X is already 7 years late. Why do you say 7.5 is that much worse financially?
2
u/777978Xops 4d ago
Because all those contracts have been renegotiated and the airlines did NOT give Boeing a lot of wiggle room to mess up again.
4
u/SwimmingSwordfish637 5d ago
I think this is less “good cop, bad cop” and more “good coms, bad coms”.
What Nimmergut & Ortberg said aren’t that different. How they said it is very different.
1
u/MysteriousAffect3903 5d ago
I agree, except Kelly said they intend to work with the union to find something that works, which Ben more or less put on the opposite front.
I'm just curious if it is planned out at the top, or if different people have different angles, and it's not necessarily a concerted effort.
There's probably no way to know for sure, but maybe the better question to ask is, what framing should we choose to operate from that gives us the best shot?
3
u/SwimmingSwordfish637 5d ago
This is a prime part of Nimmergut’s bad comms. He created a situation where the union could have said, “we are still willing to negotiate, it’s the company who is unwilling to reach an agreement.”
Intentional or not, I think Kelly had to walk that back.
5
u/KascheV 5d ago
There’s no indication that this is a good cop, bad cop scenario. The CEO is not even part of negotiations.
It would be good cop, bad cop if another contract negotiator on Boeing said what Kelly said.
12
u/Careless-Internet-63 5d ago
He hasn't been directly involved but he can pull strings and give instructions to the negotiators and could even get directly involved with negotiations if he chose to. Ultimately he's at the top of the company and controls the direction of it
3
u/KascheV 5d ago
I don’t doubt that. I’m just trying to refute what people are saying about good cop/bad cop.
Unless Kelly hints at endorsing the next contract offer (which I highly doubt) then this won’t said tactic. Kelly’s response is what I expected from Boeing’s SPEEA negotiation team in the first place.
1
u/Careless-Internet-63 5d ago
Representatives of the company are also going to say very little about negotiations or a contract when there's not an offer on the table because they don't want to accidentally say anything that could be interpreted as direct dealing
0
u/No-Truth-759 5d ago
How do you know? I’d bet he’s pulling strings and approves all economics. Impacts free cash flow.
-1
u/Careless-Internet-63 5d ago
I know he hasn't been directly involved because he hasn't been at the negotiating table
0
u/No-Truth-759 5d ago
So because he wasn’t at the table he hasn’t been involved? Lol. Your naive.
2
u/Orleanian 5d ago
I mean, in that sense, my grandmother that died 12 years ago is also involved.
She wanted me to tell you that you're daft. Indirectly, of course.
2
u/Careless-Internet-63 5d ago
Do you need me to define the word directly for you? I'm certain he's indirectly involved. He is not one of the people directly negotiating with the union
-1
u/No-Truth-759 5d ago
No one said he was.
3
u/Careless-Internet-63 5d ago
I said he's not directly involved and you called me naive for thinking that. What are you saying?
1
u/faustas 5d ago
No point to continue arguing semantics
2
u/southcounty253 5d ago
This is Reddit, a community built on pointless arguments!! /s
→ More replies (0)
2
3
u/TheRedditAppSucccks 5d ago
He’s a good speaker.
2
u/Alternative_Heron_59 5d ago
Previous CEO was constant umms. Annoying.
9
u/777XSuperHornet 5d ago
Calhoun was a useless sack of garbage in a suit. One of Kellys first action as CEO was moving his main office to the Seattle Delivery Center. Speaks volumes about his priorities.
3
u/Professional-Edge622 5d ago
Calhoun was an uncharismatic accountant, so, yeah, useless sack of garbage in a suit.
2
1
1
u/SwimmingSwordfish637 4d ago
I noticed in one of the SPEEA articles sent out this morning, the company’s response to SPEEA putting contract jobs on the website was through a spokesperson and not directly attributed to Nimmergut.
0
30
u/Zestyclose_Price_441 5d ago
It made Ben look like a child who’s throwing a tantrum.