r/SanghiKeralam • u/knam1987 • 8d ago
സംസ്കാരം/Culture Abolish caste hierarchy, not cultural heritage
Something I've noticed recently on r slash KeralaSpeaks and r slash Kerala is how quickly anyone on the Hindu Right gets labelled casteist, Brahmanvaadi, supporter of “Brahmanical hegemony”, etc.
So here's my view on caste.
First, opposition to caste hierarchy isn't something the Left invented.
Hindu society has produced its own internal challenges to social hierarchy for centuries. Ramanuja, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Kanakadasa, Basavanna, Narayana Guru — very different people and movements, obviously, but all examples of reform emerging from within Hindu society itself.
That's actually something I find interesting about Hinduism. It has a remarkable capacity for internal correction. There is no single pope, church or universally binding interpretation. One sampradaya can challenge another, an acharya can reinterpret what came before, and practices can change without requiring Hinduism itself to be rejected.
I'm not claiming Abrahamic religions cannot reform. Obviously they can and have. My point is simply that Hinduism's decentralised structure allows this kind of reform to happen rather organically.
Coming to modern Hindutva, take Veer Savarkar.
He spoke about breaking the Seven Shackles:
Vedoktabandi - restrictions on Vedic learning/rites
Vyavasayabandi - hereditary occupation
Sparshabandi - untouchability
Sindhubandi - restrictions on crossing the seas
Shuddhibandi - restrictions on reconversion
Rotibandi - restrictions on inter-dining
Betibandi - restrictions on inter-caste marriage
Whatever else you think about Savarkar, that's hardly a manifesto for preserving caste hierarchy.
The RSS too has historically tried to deemphasise caste identities within the organisation. Even something as mundane as addressing people by first names rather than constantly foregrounding caste surnames fits into that broader idea of a common Hindu identity.
Does that mean caste is gone? Obviously not.
A lot of Savarkar's “shackles” have weakened enormously or disappeared, but caste discrimination still exists and marriage remains largely endogamous.
So yes, I want the caste system abolished.
But here's my nuance: I don't think abolishing caste requires erasing community heritage.
Food, rituals, customs, festivals, family traditions, community history — why should any of that disappear?
An SC person can be proud of their community's heritage while completely rejecting caste hierarchy. The same applies to a Namboothiri, Nair, Ezhava or anyone else. Being attached to your community's traditions is not the same thing as believing your community is superior to another.
This isn't just theoretical for me either. I'm in an inter-caste marriage. My wife and I also come from very different regions of Kerala.
We're raising our daughter to be proud of her mother's and father's community traditions, as well as the different regional traditions she gets from both sides.
There is no contradiction there. Heritage doesn't require hierarchy.
What I want gone is the idea that birth makes someone higher or lower, or should determine whom you marry, what you do, where you worship, whom you eat with or how you're treated.
Ideally, caste eventually becomes socially irrelevant.
TL;DR: Caste hierarchy and discrimination? Get rid of them. Caste barriers? Get rid of them. Community traditions and heritage? Keep them if they mean something to you.
You don't need to erase your past to stop using it as a hierarchy.