Hi everyone!

I’m working on an app idea focused on something that women deal with every day but rarely get honest, unbiased guidance on finding genuinely good products.

The idea is a women-only platform where users can:

• Discover and search for beauty, skincare, haircare, wellness, and personal care products
• Get real recommendations from other women based on actual experience
• Filter by skin type, hair type, concerns, budget, lifestyle, and more
• Save, share, and build a personal vault of trusted products

There’s a lot of noise, sponsored content, and fake reviews out there — the idea is to create a safe, honest, and helpful space built by women, for women.

Would this be something you’d use or recommend? What features would make it truly valuable for you?

Would love your honest thoughts, suggestions, and any advice!

iPhone needs a Mission Impossible Screenshot shortcut.

You take the screenshot.
You post it/send it/whatever
It deletes from your phone in 30 seconds.

PLEASE, for the love of god, can someone with the capabilities to please create sensory popsockets?? I’m talking squishy, grooved, pointy, anything for sensory seekers. Pretty please??

Hey everyone,
I'm working on a zero-cost product concept for an app targeting neighborhood help in Saudi Arabia-specifically connecting youth/volunteers with elderly residents or neighbors who need quick physical help (carrying heavy groceries, moving furniture, simple tech assistance).

The Core Mechanics:
• No Money Involved: Purely volunteer-based, rooted in the concept of Faza'a
• Karma / Reputation System: Volunteers gain points, unlock badges, and build a local community protile (which could ideally count toward official community service hours).
• Family Manager Mode: Allows sons/daughters to request help for their elderly parents remotely.

l'a love your honest feedback on 3 things:
1. Would older family members actually trust a stranger from a local app for errand help?
2. What safety/verification features (e.g., Absher/ Nafath integration) would be non-negotiable for you?
3. What would make a volunteer actually open the app to help someone 1 km away for free?

Be as brutal as you want-just trying to validate the idea before designing the full Ul/UX prototype

Free website idea for someone who wants a fun weekend project:

RedZone Ad Watch.

Automatically track every commercial, double-box ad, banner and sponsored segment during NFL RedZone.

Show ads per hour, total ad time, longest commercial-free stretch and a “Commercial-Free Index” by week.

Basically track the slow death of “7 hours of commercial-free football.”

Someone please build this. I want to use it every Sunday.

We're lost in our rabbitholes. You know how sensitive and responsive your algos have become to anything you vaguely express interest in on your timelines whether that's youtube, twitter, or whatever else. That has the effect of never being able to discover something truly random, that's neither directly related to our "expressed" interests nor channels we have interacted with/subscribed to in the past. the true stumbleupon for the algo. please make this before i take a crack at it.

TheQuietCorner

Just you and your quiet corner.

What is it? -

TheQuietCorner is a social platform designed around the idea that meeting people shouldn't require you to present yourself to the world. There are no swipes, popularity scores, follower counts, or endless profile cards. Instead, you simply go somewhere.

The somewhere doesn't have to exist physically. You might be sitting at home reading a book while your phone is open to the Library. You might actually be sitting in a library. The app doesn't need to know. You simply enter a Corner and exist there.

The idea -

What if meeting someone didn't begin with presenting yourself to them?

Traditional social and dating platforms begin with profiles: your best photograph, your best bio, your interests, your statistics. TheQuietCorner reverses the process.

First comes the shared environment. Then the encounter. Then the conversation. Then, if both people want it, gradually getting to know each other.

The Corners -

Possible Corners include the Library, Café, Park, Arcade, Studio, and Home. Each can contain

smaller contexts such as Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance, Just browsing, Reading, Drawing, Music, or simply Sitting.

The user should never feel as though they are operating a matchmaking algorithm. There are no giant population counters or competitive interfaces. Instead, the environment quietly communicates its atmosphere: "The library seems quiet today..." or "The library feels a little more alive than usual..."

Encountering strangers -

You are sitting in the Fantasy section. You notice a stranger. You don't know their name, face, or biography. Perhaps you know only a few voluntarily shared details, such as approximate age and hobbies.

"You notice a stranger while in the fantasy section."

[Approach] [Maybe next time]

Maybe you approach. Maybe you don't. [Maybe next time] is deliberately not a rejection. The person remains a stranger and may be encountered again later. The same person might be seen ten, twenty, or a hundred times before either person decides to talk.

The encounter system -

The system works quietly in the background. It chooses who notices whom and prevents one person from being overwhelmed by multiple simultaneous approaches. The user never sees rounds, queues, numbers, matchmaking scores, or algorithmic machinery. They are simply present in the Corner.

This allows real-life-like asymmetry. Two people can notice each other independently. One may

choose [Maybe next time] while the other chooses to approach. On another occasion, the roles may reverse.

Conversation -

"A stranger approaches you"

[Engage] [Smile and look away]

If both sides engage, the app simply says: You begin a conversation with the stranger. There is no artificial "match" celebration. Two people have simply decided to talk.

From stranger to familiar -

A relationship is allowed to develop naturally: stranger, conversation, familiarity, friendship, romance, or nothing at all. None of these are achievements or required outcomes.

Someone you have already spoken with can appear again. Instead of a stranger encounter, you might simply see:

"You notice Alex. You can [nod] or [wave]"

You might talk, or you might simply continue what you were doing. Familiarity exists without obligation.

At any point, either person can choose [Become strangers again] The conversation ends, access is withdrawn, and the system remembers that these two people should not be introduced to each other again.

Privacy as a progression -

The only mandatory profile information is hobbies. Everything else is optional: name, nickname, age, height, photograph, interests, and personal content.

Information is something the user gives rather than something the application takes. A person may gradually grant access to parts of their Home: artwork, music, writing, photography, books, or other hobbies.

The profile isn't a résumé. It's a house with doors, and the user holds the keys.

Home -

Home is the user's personal space. The Corners are where people meet, Home is where someone

can choose to let another person meet them. Access is granted intentionally and can be controlled by the user.

The physical world is optional -

TheQuietCorner does not need to know where the user physically is. Someone at home can be in the Library. Someone actually sitting in a library can also be in the Library. Two people may even discover that they were physically in the same place at the same time without the app ever knowing.The digital Corner is a social environment, not a location service. The user may use it as a bridge toward real-world interaction, or remain entirely inside the digital space.

Safety -

Safety should be quiet, contextual, and empowering rather than frightening. The application should never imply that TheQuietCorner is inherently safe while the outside world is inherently dangerous. It

should instead help users remember that they have control.

Users can remain anonymous, walk away, stop a conversation, revoke permissions, become

strangers again, trust their instincts, or continue talking entirely inside the app. If a conversation

appears to be moving toward an offline meeting, the application can gently remind both people that they do not have to share anything they are uncomfortable sharing and can choose to remain in the Corner.

Identity and age verification, reporting, blocking, moderation, temporary restrictions, and other

technical safeguards can exist behind the scenes. Their purpose is to protect users without turning the application into a constant warning system.

What The Quiet Corner is not -

It is not Tinder with different graphics. It is not a dating simulator. It is not a promise that strangers are trustworthy. It is not a replacement for real life. It is not a system that decides who someone should love.

It is also not designed to force interaction. Someone can enter a Corner, talk to nobody, read their book, listen to the ambience, and leave. That is a perfectly valid use of the application.

The principles -

- Participation does not require exposure.

- Presence does not require interaction.

- Interaction does not require immediate disclosure.

- Disclosure is voluntary.

- Leaving is always allowed.

- Relationships are outcomes, not objectives.

The core idea -

You don't have to go outside to go somewhere.

You don't have to talk to someone to be around them.

You don't have to show yourself to be seen.

You don't have to be brave today.

Maybe next time.

TheQuietCorner

Just you and your quiet corner.

I have an idea for an application where users can virtually explore any part of Earth. You could use your phone to zoom in and out on a digital globe and travel to virtually any location in the world.

The most interesting part would be that it wouldn't just use satellite images or static photos. Instead, it would provide real-time, live 360° video, ideally in 4K HD quality. Users could look around in every direction and zoom in closer to explore the environment at ground level.

For example, you could explore mountains, rivers, oceans, forests, lakes, countryside, or urban areas and see what is happening there in real time. In forests, you could potentially observe trees, leaves, animals, snakes, crocodiles, birds, and other wildlife. In cities, you could explore buildings, rooftops, roads, vehicles, streets, and other surroundings.

Basically, the concept would be something like Google Earth + Street View + live 360° camera streaming, but with the goal of making Earth feel continuously live and explorable.

You simply select a location, zoom in, and explore the available area through live, high-quality 360° video, making it feel as if you are actually there.

Has anyone created an AI-powered clone of Lumosity?

I have my mom, who has borderline dementia, play specific Lumosity games on her Android tablet to help keep her mind active. There are exactly only 11 games, out of the dozens they have, that work well for her.

The problem is that Lumosity doesn't let you create a custom queue. Because of this, I have to sit with her during the entire session just to manually load the next appropriate game. This is incredibly cumbersome, and it's compounded by the fact that she needs to play those 11 games in two sets—which just doubles the amount of time I have to spend babysitting the screen.

I am actually seriously considering paying for an AI coding tool to just build these 11 games myself. Has anyone done something like this already? I'd love to know how you did it and what your workflow looked like.

Hello everyone, this my first post here. I appreciate any honest feedback and/or suggestions. I don't have many people to bounce ideas off of so I'm looking forward to any responses.

Every social platform treats your life like a feed... newest post on top, everything older buried and forgotten. I've been sketching out something different: a personal timeline where every memory or moment you save adds to your own ongoing thread. Instead of scrolling a feed, you scroll your life, in order, from your first entry to today. That life, is your very own String.

A few pieces of it:

• Different knot types for different kinds of moments; a memory, a thought, an achievement, a hard day, a milestone
• Your profile isn't followers/following, it's the length of your string and how many knots you've tied
• Two people can share a knot for something they experienced together; a trip, a relationship, a friendship ;so you can literally see where your life intersected with someone else's
• No algorithm, no infinite scroll — you navigate your own life by time

Still very early, no app obviously exists yet. Genuinely just trying to figure out if this is something people would want before I build anything.

Would you use something like this? What would make you not want to use it? Brutal honesty welcome. I understand social platforms are very competitive this day and age, and plan to deliver this as a more personal journal that can be connected with other special people in your life, as well as people you meet along the way. People use apps like facebook, instagram, and snapchat to store memories. May this be something that is more personal and meaningful that everyone can look back and truly resonate with. God bless you all! Thank you!

An AI-enabled police dashcam system designed specifically for vehicle pursuits.

When pursuit mode is activated, the system would continuously analyze:

• The suspect vehicle
• The pursuing police vehicle
• Speed
• GPS location
• Traffic density
• Intersections
• Pedestrians
• Weather and visibility
• Road conditions
• Dangerous driving events

Instead of requiring the pursuing officer to verbally report every important event over the radio while also trying to drive safely, the AI would automatically log and transmit relevant incidents to dispatch and the pursuit supervisor.

Examples:

• Red lights or stop signs run
• Wrong-way driving
• Near collisions
• Dangerous speeds
• Heavy pedestrian or traffic areas
• Hard braking or evasive maneuvers
• Suspect driving behavior
• Pursuing officer driving behavior

Dispatch and supervisors would receive a live dashboard showing the current conditions, recent events, and an explainable public danger score.

The system could separately display:

• Pursuit danger
• Need for immediate apprehension
• Likelihood the suspect can simply be identified and arrested later

That distinction matters.

For example, a pursuit involving an expired registration may become too dangerous to justify continuing.

But if dispatch then confirms the driver has an active violent felony warrant, known weapons warnings, or other verified information that materially increases the importance of immediate apprehension, the supervisor should be able to see that information alongside the current danger level.

The AI should present verified facts rather than attempting to predict that someone is secretly guilty of another crime.

Automatic Evidence Marking

One particularly useful feature would be automatic detection of objects being thrown from the suspect vehicle.

If the camera sees something tossed from the car, the system could automatically:

• Mark the estimated GPS location
• Record the exact time
• Record the direction of travel
• Save a short video clip of the discard
• Estimate what kind of object was thrown
• Give the detection a confidence score
• Send the location to trailing officers for retrieval

Instead of an officer having to radio something like:

The system could generate:

Using camera geometry, vehicle speed, heading, distance to the suspect vehicle, and GPS data, the system could estimate where the object actually landed rather than simply marking where the police cruiser happened to be when it was seen.

Department Policy Assistance

The software could also contain the department's pursuit policy.

As conditions change, it could compare the known facts against that policy and alert the supervisor.

For example:

Or:

The AI would not make the final decision to continue or terminate the pursuit.

That decision would always remain with the human supervisor.

After-Action Review

Everything could be synchronized into a single timeline afterward:

• Dashcam footage
• GPS route
• Vehicle speeds
• Hazard detections
• Evidence discard locations
• Radio traffic
• Risk-score changes
• Supervisor decisions

That would make the system useful not only during the pursuit, but afterward for evidence, training, policy review, and accident investigation.

The basic concept is essentially an automated second observer whose only job is to watch the pursuit, record what is happening, identify hazards and evidence, and keep the supervisor informed while the officer driving can concentrate on actually driving.

Disclaimer: This idea is freely offered for anyone to use, develop, modify, commercialize, or build upon. I make no claim to compensation, royalties, ownership, or other financial interest in any product or service created from it.

This ones quite difficult to explain but its like vr with a motion sensor that changes what you see with angle its at, 360 degrees any angle. Each sides viewer for each eye displays a 3d computer game world. You look into the binoculars to see a fully imersable world you can move in. Having a forwards and backwards button would mean you control the angle with the angle of the device and go forwards or backwards where your facing. If instead you walk there would need to be space so you dont trip. Games could be war games like being the gunner in a plane in ww2, 3d puzzles, sport, rpg etc.... It would be possible for it to be standalone or linked to a device. There could be built in games or buy extra ones. Basically its a different way to do something like vr. Buttons could be on it to take actions like shoot. Its also possible to do this kind of thing with an alice in wonderland style looking glass or a telescope shaped device. As the binoculars show two pictures it could be possible to slightly change the angle of each screen to give a 3d effect.

Most powered wearables still seem mentally designed like smartphones: a new generation comes out, the internal sensors improve slightly, and suddenly the industry expects you to junk the whole monolithic unit. It’s anti-consumer nonsense. I’d much rather see a shared waist-worn assist platform where components that age at wildly different rates can be swapped independently.

Battery loses capacity after two years? Pop a fresh power pack in. Motor-control algorithms outgrow the processor? Swap the compute module. Harness straps wear down from sweat and friction? They shouldn't force you to replace expensive logic boards and servos.

Obviously, modularity has a tax standardized connectors add weight, weatherproofing seals add bulk, and eventually the main structural chassis becomes the bottleneck. But for heavy-use physical assist gear, upgradeable longevity beats making the unit "0.5mm thinner" every single time.

Are there any other cutting-edge modular designs out there in robotics, specialized wearables, or hardware tech that have actually pulled off this upgradeable platform model well?

An indie show that is like a podcast were its a bunch of pop culture characters all across media just like talking to each other. Thats about it

Anyone working for Google and Apple, are you able to make reviews for apps, and other products searchable. Airbnb has this and it really saves a lot of time. Usually as a customer, sometimes you’re looking for specific keywords and that definitely saves time.

A VH1 Pop-Up Video style video of every Donald Trump speech and the pop-up bubbles would be fact checking in real time. Maybe even using the same soft sarcasm VH1 used to use.

Dear Reddit, there is a currently to the best of my knowledge unsolved important problem, which is that people run claude cowork and give it access to their files and run a lot of commands that they often times dont fully understand. This blind trust is extremely risky and it's very convenient to just rely on Claude to do everything.

Does anybody know of a tool [and if it doesn't exist, please make it] that runs an independent agent alongside the claude agent and independently checks the work of the claude agent for malicious activity or fatal mistakes?

I have collected some ebooks over the years. Some books are in different languages.
Now I have some time and wanted to read them but since the text is displayed in "pictures" the translator function don't work. Only the text around is translated.
So here I am at my PC, using Google Translate on my smartphone to translate every bit of text. It’s tedious, time-consuming, and completely impractical. Is there something like a live translator for the entire pc screen—where you define an area, select the source and target languages, and the screen content gets translated automatically?

I would like to have a website that is backed up by a vast network of authors and experts from who you can request a book on a certain topic. After internal evaluation of a suggestion’s profitability, or how much it would cost me contributing to render it somewhat profitable, authors are offered this topic and a coordination process takes place.

Of course it’s more complex than this. Likely it’s not feasible. Perhaps there is no sufficient demand. Perhaps I’m just ignorant about already existing alternatives. Perhaps AI is the closest to this we have come to. But sometimes I’d like to read on a given topic only to find there exists no such book, just scattered, narrow wiki articles or highly specific PhD theses. Given the ever increasing wealth of information, I am aware these cases might be marginal exceptions.

Basically, what I have in mind is the book-writing equivalent of this very sub. Just wanted to get this off my chest.

I've noticed that when looking for a laptop, most comparison sites start with the brand/model, rather than the requirements you have.

For example, if someone wanted:

• $1,500 or less
• 16GB+ RAM
• 8+ hours battery
• Under 1.5kg
• Mainly for coding + university

Would it be useful to search using those requirements and see which models match them best?

I'm particularly wondering whether this would be useful if limited to a smaller selection of brands, rather than trying to cover every computer available.

What would you personally want to filter/compare when looking for a laptop?

A simple idea that courses with bite sized lessons could be done by just signing up to a mailing list of the course. Bite sized lessons and could reply to the email to give answers to quiz questions. Easy, cheap, quick to setup. Each email is a mini lesson. If one day is inconvienient, open it later to catch up. Could use pc, mobile or tablet.