r/Suburbanhell • u/August272021 • 1d ago
Discussion The self-defeating paradox of the growing suburb
I live in upstate South Carolina. SC has been the fastest growing state (per capita) in the nation for several years now, and the growth is almost entirely suburban in nature. Yeah, you have some urban infill, but most of the growth is greenfield development on the fringe.
The funny thing is, the more suburbanites move to a popular suburb, the more they all hate that suburb. You know what I mean?
How many times do you crack open Facebook and see people complaining that they moved to the area BECAUSE it was less dense, but then all the other suburbanites had the same idea, and now it's more dense? People say variations of this ALL THE TIME.
So it seems like suburbia is inherently unsustainable, because people move there for reasons that will not remain the same assuming other people also move there. It's like it's all based on exclusivity, and the more people move there, the less exclusive it is.
Cities on the other hand are the opposite. As an urbanist, all I want is for people to build dense, mixed-use housing on every empty surface parking lot in town. Because the more people you have in the core city, the more people you have walking, biking, and riding the bus. The more people you have living IN downtown, the less you have to cater to the suburbanites who just drive through and demand wider roads and more free parking. You can actually improve your city if more people actually live in it.
