Ace Spectrum: Rename?
I LOVE THE COMMUNITY/THIS IS NOT TO BE TAKEN MALICIOUSLY NOR WAS IT MADE WITH MALICIOUS INTENT
I am an Asexual who believes that Asexuality has lost its meaning, and I'm going to tell you why before going any deeper. So, let's talk science:
"ASEXUAL reproduction is a process where a single parent creates offspring"
Thank you for coming to my very brief talk of science.
Anyway, what I draw from that is that asexuality is a lack of need for sex. Which translates to a lack of sexual attraction, right?
Now, before I was aware I was an asexual, I knew of the Ace Spectrum. I thought, oh, that's neat but...why is it called the ACE spectrum? It ranges from sub sexualities with zero sexual attraction to 100% sexual attraction, so I can see why asexual could be the name for said spectrum. But then, that causes the issue where asexual becomes the umbrella term and loses its meaning as zero sexual attraction because it's associated with sexualities that do experience sexual attraction. IN MY OPINION.
Kind of like people between homo and hetero, they fall between 2 extremes on the spectrum. Why would we be using heterosexual as the umbrella term? Wouldn't it lose the meaning as complete attraction to only the opposite sex/gender? Wouldn't it be more logical to call it the homosexual spectrum?
Queer is a term for people who are in the LGBTQ community. Why can't something like that work for what is currently referred to as the Asexual Spectrum? Like Grey Allo or something?
Can't it be referred to as the Allo Spectrum (Allosexual), or something similar like Grey Spectrum (Greysexual)? Greysexual, as far as I'm aware, is experiencing sexual attraction rarely, so it would be like the term bisexual, the in-between sexuality. Allosexual is regular sexual attraction; wouldn't that be a better name for the umbrella term? Everyone with sexual attraction falls under the Allo Spectrum, right?
Anyhow, all this is to ask: WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON THE MATTER AS EITHER A QUEER PERSON OR AN ALLY?
My opinion, if not clear, is that Asexual is = to Heterosexual as a title. A label with no leeway. You can't be straight and be attracted to the same sex; you can't be asexual and experience sexual attraction. Which means that the spectrum should not be titled asexual because it may lead to, and is actively leading to, confusion about whether asexuals have sexual attraction or not.
I AM AWARE OF THE OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF ASEXUALITY
If you want to know why I don't agree with it, you can go back to my brief talk of science.
Let me reiterate: NO hate! This is just something I think we should take into account because... Well, why keep a label that is actively harming asexuals?
Love and accept everybody; be respectful always! (Exceptions to the above statement: pedophiles, rapists, homophobes, Israel supporters, etc)
'This is a revised version because the other one was written while I was extremely tired and high. Have I miffed it, or is my point getting across?'