r/aislop Jul 28 '26

Found on Facebook “The divorce came out of nowhere”

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

1.1k

u/TheTierIsHere Jul 28 '26

I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that it means "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife (and have eaten the forbidden fruit of knowledge)"

633

u/Sadoguricappu Jul 28 '26

Maga forgot that eve was trick into eating the forbidden fruit.

376

u/MikeofK72 Jul 28 '26

And technically God put more blame on Adam, due to him being older and because he held authority over Eve. Basically, he should've prevented Eve from choosing to sin. And blaming Lucifer is like blaming gravity for making you drop your phone. A snake is gonna snake.

229

u/LoveTriscuit Jul 28 '26

And it even says she “gave it to her husband who was with her”. So he was there and watched it and didn’t do anything to stop it.

132

u/Atrium41 Jul 28 '26

Something always stuck with me.

If Eve was made from Adam's rib, did she transition from male rib to adult female? Making her the first femboy?

44

u/Mudcat-69 Jul 28 '26

She would be the first gender bent clone, the second being Jesus.

18

u/Putrid-Delivery1852 Jul 28 '26

Sci-fi bible is wild.

19

u/crandall17 Jul 28 '26

Sci-fi Bible is just Bible

→ More replies (1)

29

u/MrMToomey Jul 28 '26

That's actually some deep lore. Adam means human (gender neutral) so there is a strong theory that Adam was originally hermaphoditic and his female parts were removed to create Eve.

4

u/Pleasant-Kick4155 Jul 29 '26

A “strong theory” regarding a fictional character?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Visual-Flan-4098 Jul 30 '26

it all comes back to the greeks. for those that dont, zeus split the originally humans in half and created man and woman when doing this.

10

u/juiceboxvillain_1 Jul 28 '26

Not how femboys work lmao

23

u/RainbowDashieeee Jul 28 '26

Femboys are still men.

What you describe is a trans women.

And tbh calling a trans women a femboys is extremely offensive and transphobic

11

u/Atrium41 Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

Right, but the concept of woman didn't exist yet. All she knew was what her genetic father-husband knew

I'm sorry if it offended you. No animosity at all, here. I just like poking at the Bible crowd with a topic that makes them uncomfortable. It's a terrible joke

→ More replies (3)

6

u/fruityfactory Jul 28 '26

That wouldn't be femboy though, that would be trans woman. Big difference.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/sky_cap5959 Jul 28 '26

If I recall correctly, only certain translations refer to the bone as a rib. In the original texts, I'm pretty sure it's not specified what bone it is. This has lead to the theory that eve was created from the penis bone, because well... humans are pretty much the only mammal without one.

Please somebody correct me if anythings wrong, because there's a chance I'm just saying shit.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)

47

u/stereomanic Jul 28 '26

we men, so typical, on the side, staying quiet while our wives talk to snakes. haha.

18

u/SupermassiveCanary Jul 28 '26

And God said “let there be a snake to tempt them so I may punish. And punish he did, and God enjoyed it.”

3

u/InfiniteSoul45 Jul 28 '26

Because that god is also Lucifer and was never god. Sneaky sneaky.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

62

u/Ok-Ad4375 Jul 28 '26

And if I remember correctly didn't god tell Adam specifically not to eat the fruit but didn't tell eve? He made the rule before creating eve.

53

u/AnimeMemeLord1 Jul 28 '26

Probably, but Adam was there too and not only did not stop her, but even ate it with her.

28

u/Pristine_Walrus40 Jul 28 '26

After her.

You first got to make sure it is not poison.

13

u/ctesibius Jul 28 '26

Eve's conversation with the serpent says that she knew and thought of it as applying to both of them. Still, it is strange that historically it's just described as "the sin of Adam".

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Lokkia111 Jul 28 '26

And god supposedly knew what was going to happen and decided to put the tree in the garden anyway. Hes sadistic.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Aquos18 Jul 28 '26

Adam told eve beucase she knows of the command.

13

u/RedBomberX11 Jul 28 '26

Well God also created them not knowing what good or evil were, yet gets mad at them for doing something bad that he set up in the first place. Best not to think about it too much.

12

u/E8P3 Jul 28 '26

"Best not to think about it too much" is a good tag line for the bible.

3

u/Much-Ferret90 Jul 28 '26

She knew not to do it

5

u/RedBomberX11 Jul 28 '26

How do you know that something is wrong if you have no knowledge of right or wrong? Of good or evil? God can say don't do something all he wants, but what good will that do? And why put the stupid tree there in the first place? There was literally no reason to other than being a plot device to explain why bad things happen.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

33

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

Also, Adam was given the job of tilling and keeping the garden. A lot of scholars have interpreted that as meaning his job was to guard the garden. His whole job was to make sure something like that didn’t happen, but he was with Eve the whole time and let it happen. He fucked up way before he ate the fruit.

17

u/SatinwithLatin Jul 28 '26

Adam didn't hold authority over Eve, that's a perspective planted by the same gender role dorks trying to make it sound like God planned for women to be submissive even in paradise. 

Other leading interpretations are that Adam was penalised because a) he was there with Eve as she was being tricked and did nothing to counter it b) willingly ate the fruit with open eyes to what it would do.

11

u/ericbondre Jul 28 '26

They couldn’t have known really anything about the fruit other than when god told them not to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil

7

u/Apathetic_Villainess Jul 28 '26

And how does one understand that not listening is wrong before they learn about right and wrong?

→ More replies (5)

7

u/Omnealice Jul 28 '26

It’s funny if you think about it though because if god is omniscient and omnipotent then it’s technically his fault the snake even existed in the first place and that he already knew how eve would react to the snake.

Like they even had a choice in the matter when god made them in such a way that he would already know what they would choose.

The whole thing makes no sense.

5

u/Ervaloss Jul 28 '26

The story is from a tradition that doesn’t view god as omnipotent. The bible has stories from various traditions in it.

This version of god is more anthropomorphic, an actual being with his own body comparable to how the ancient Greeks viewed their gods. At one point after eating the fruit Adam hides from god who is walking around in the garden looking for him. God calls out to Adam to show himself because he cannot find him. That is clearly not a depiction of an omnipotent god.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

15

u/[deleted] Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

28

u/DeniedAppeal1 Jul 28 '26

Much of what people think they know from the Bible is essentially fan-fiction and headcanon. It's a lot like what Supergiant did with Hades and the history of the Greek pantheon, or what Supernatural did with all religion.

16

u/Environmental_Top948 Jul 28 '26

Aren't their whole books of the Bible rejected because they don't fit what the fanon. Like I'm pretty sure one of them has a flying Jesus.

11

u/legendarysupermom Jul 28 '26

You think thats wild! Look into the book of Enoch lol or do some digging on Adam's first wife Lillith 😄

Edit- they really did do Lilith dirty tho

3

u/Kipman2000 Jul 28 '26

Wait, what? I’m not very well versed in the bible, but wasn’t Adam and Eve supposed to be the first two humans? (Allegedly)

8

u/Maehock Jul 28 '26

The Book of Genesis has two different creation of man myths. The first presented has man and woman made from the earth at the same time. The second is man made from dust and woman made from his rib some time later after Adam gets lonely.

That's how the story of Lilith, Adam's first wife, came to be. She thought herself equal since they were both created by good from the same stuff at the same time. Apparently Adam was a fragile little bitch and Lilith thinking she was equal upset him, and what's worse she tried to get on top during sex. So Adam whined to God and God kicked Lilith out of the garden.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/DuckyHornet Jul 28 '26

Yes, but at the same time, when their son Cain kills his brother Abel, Cain flees his parents to go live with another group of people

4

u/lck0219 Jul 28 '26

Maybe god did the whole create man and woman thing a few times (because he cares about the gene pool) but only the first set were important. By couple number two, we were like “alright, no one likes a show off” so history forgot them all.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Right-Today4396 Jul 28 '26

Lilith was made of mud, if I recall correctly. Adam didn't like her much, and so God made Eve from his rib

7

u/legendarysupermom Jul 28 '26

According to a Jewish chapter if I remember correctly lillith was adams first wife and made from mud not a rib piece from Adam so she retained alot of independent thought and Adam didnt like her cause she questioned him too much...something happens that I cant remember and god becomes angry with lillith and turns her into a baby eating demon but honestly if my choices were to be completely subservient to some dude or be a kick ass demon chick with power to wield I think id choose demon too lol

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Suspicious_Dingo_426 Jul 28 '26

People that don't understand the Bible, which includes many people that claim to believe in it. The serpent was just a serpent. If it was Lucifer, God's curse would not make any sense.

"Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”

Why would God compare Lucifer to animals? The term 'all the days of your life' implies an ending of that life, making it a strange curse to put on an immortal being. Why would God mention offspring?

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Gremict Jul 28 '26

Thr author of Paradise Lost

7

u/Silverfire12 Jul 28 '26

It’s a widely held belief that it was. There’s nothing stating it, but the interpretation is that it was Lucifer.

6

u/Dependent-Tailor7366 Jul 28 '26

So then why was it referred to as a wild animal and why did God curse it to crawl on its belly and eat dust? The name Lucifer isn’t even in the bible.

5

u/Piggstein Jul 28 '26

I wanna know how snakes were getting around before the whole ‘now crawl on your belly’ curse.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/mvanvrancken Jul 28 '26

Not to scholars. The story is an etiology, an origin story for the world’s state of affairs. The snake doesn’t have legs because it tricked Eve. Eve has painful childbirth because she was tricked. Adam has to toil the field because he was tricked.

It’s just why snakes don’t have legs. Nothing to do with the devil, who isn’t even really a proper adversary until the Gospels changed him. Lucifer is also not his name, that’s a misreading of Isaiah 14

4

u/BigDamBeavers Jul 28 '26

Catholicism. They took a half-dozen biblical and regional baddies and conglomerated them into one Devil for narrative sake.

3

u/Educational-Analyst4 Jul 28 '26

I'm pretty sure that the most prevalent interpretation is that the serpent was Satan. Through other methods people equate Lucifer to Satan, though I know a lot of people think of them as different entities. I am an atheist who hasn't read the Bible in years but from what I gather that is how they are all connected, however take my word with a grain of salt.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Adowyth Jul 28 '26

I don't know how anyone can read that Bible and see God as the good guy and Lucifer as the bad guy. The God side is "you should do as a say and obey me and never question anything i do" Lucifers' side is "how about you think for yourself?"

And then God punishes everyone for asking questions.

→ More replies (13)

6

u/VladimirIkea4 Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

Adam didnt have authority over Eve in paradise. Eve didnt get the rule, because it was given specifically to Adam before she existed. She may have known about the rule, but that does not make the rule count for Eve, the same way the rule didnt apply to other animals in paradise. Therefore, God was only mad at Adam, and nothing happened when Eve ate it.

Edit: extra info on this explanation for those who like. Adam told Eve the rule to make sure to never eat from it. By telling Eve, she couldn't accidentally give it to Adam, since she didnt eat it herself. He also goes a step further and tells her to not touch the tree.

A common explanation is that when the snake told Eve to eat the fruit, she first touched the tree, and nothing happenend, so she concluded that the rules were made up.

4

u/DuckingFon Jul 28 '26

Nowhere in the bible does it say the snake was Satan/Lucifer. Without doing some severe mental gymnastics, Eve was just chatting with your everyday average garden snake.

3

u/Raccoons-trsh Jul 28 '26

It doesn't make sense to blame anyone, since they didn't knew what was wrong or right before eating the forbidden fruit. So they didn't knew it was wrong to break a rule (which is also some weird af thing to say because some rules aren't good either).

3

u/Alternative_Range871 Jul 28 '26

In fairness, the snakes I encounter aren’t offering me fruit from a tree.

→ More replies (33)

12

u/Azair_Blaidd Jul 28 '26

Also that Eve was originally part of Adam. Eve was already a reflection of Adam's own inner desires. Ergo, Adam is truly the one at fault.

16

u/Electronic_Quote399 Jul 28 '26

But he was created in God's image, so who's really to blame?

→ More replies (1)

25

u/Quen-Tin Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 31 '26

MAGA forgot that the Bible is a collection of stories, that were mostly altered by a bunch of males over centuries to create a religios narrative. Useing often chunks of other traditional narratives from neighboring cultures with different religions, to bring some order and meaning into their ancient lifes. With the restricted understanding of semitic half nomadic tribes in ancient times.

Now selectively interpreted mostly by more modern but still very traditional guys, to keep their traditional view alive in a way, that benefits their own agenda.

If women would have done the same, then maybe we would have Adam being created out of a rip from Eve, by a female god. The ark would have been under the command of a female captain. And Jesus followers would have included way more women or likely even a female partner.

But yeah: let's pretend that a snake speaking to a mythical woman justifies the need of male leadership thousands of years after those stories were written down, until we find better reason for sticking with patriarchy.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/Federal-Business-796 Jul 28 '26

To them that just proves the mental inferiority of women to be fooled by a snake

18

u/Environmental_Top948 Jul 28 '26

Eve also effortlessly fooled Adam so what's that say about man?

11

u/Federal-Business-796 Jul 28 '26

To them, that just proves why men should never listen to a woman. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/TpK_Wynter Jul 28 '26

They didn’t forget. They’ve never read it in the first place. The majority of the people who think this way get all their religious information second hand and possibly even third-hand. The preacher needs to read it to some of them, and the rest just find snippets on Facebook and TikTok

→ More replies (25)

21

u/Suspicious_Dingo_426 Jul 28 '26

Correct. Christians love complaining about how atheists take Bible quotes out of context, yet remove tons of context themselves when it suits their purposes.

10

u/Winderige_Garnaal Jul 28 '26

... out on a limb lol

8

u/Evil_Sheepmaster Jul 28 '26

Wait, are you bringing context into this?! This is MAGA! We don't do that around these parts!

7

u/DrBatman0 Jul 28 '26

yeah, I think it's like "Because you did what she said (which in this case was what I told you not to do)"

8

u/Witty_Ad_898 Jul 28 '26

So god makes heaven and earth, and makes a garden, and he makes a tree, and he makes that tree’s fruit give knowledge of good and evil, and he makes the fruit of that tree forbidden.

Then he puts humans in that garden, and they are made in his image but they have no knowledge of good or evil, and he commands them to not eat the fruit of the forbidden tree.

But man and woman do not know good or evil. They eat the fruit. They are punished.

How the fuck is this scenario not entirely and 100% god’s own fucking fault? This is kicking rocks level of cause and effect. It is such a fucking stupid excuse for misogyny and the entire original sin bullshit. Who can believe such a cosmic fool is omniscient or good?

4

u/5millionmiles Jul 28 '26

Hey, let's not read into anything.

We should all respect the wishes and God given authority of some people to tell other people how to interpret what their own eyes can easily read out of a copy of one of the most accessible published pieces of literature of all time.

But, TL;DR or something like that

4

u/SlimyBoiXD Jul 28 '26

Pretty sure this is actually about his wife telling him to do the opposite of what God said, so in this specific instance listening to his wife was bad.

3

u/tracerhaha Jul 28 '26

God knew beforehand that they would disobey and set them up for failure.

3

u/earthwoodandfire Jul 28 '26

Those elipses are doing some very heavy lifting for OOPs point.

3

u/KermitTheScot Jul 28 '26

I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess that the person who made this and/or posted it isn’t actually married.

→ More replies (27)

562

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

This isn’t even accurate to how the Bible says husbands should act. Paul says in Ephesians 5:25, “Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the Church and gave himself up for her.” Basically, you should love your wife enough to die for her. And if you love her enough to die for her, you should try to make sure she’s happy in the marriage. Later, in verse 28, Paul says, “…husbands should love their wives as their own bodies.” Basically, treat her like you would treat yourself. So this isn’t even accurate to how a “Biblical marriage” should be.

196

u/StabbyBoo Jul 28 '26

And God only has a problem with Adam listening to Eve on one very specific topic on one very specific occasion, which the AI quote conveniently ellipses over.

65

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

Exactly! And it was specifically with something that God very clearly told Adam not to do. It wasn’t because Adam listened to Eve. It was because he listened to Eve and did the one thing that God told him not to do.

There are also lots of instances in Scripture of men listening to and following the advice of women, including (but not limited to) their wives. God never took issue with it unless the woman in question was leading them to disobey God. They cherry picked one verse about God taking issue with it and then completely removed the context of why God had a problem with it.

3

u/Signal-Card-2387 Jul 29 '26

To add, the first people to see Jesus post-resurrection were women. I don't think that's by accident.

This is wild for the time, as women were seen as lesser than men, but yet women were chosen to see the Messiah first before any man, even Jesus' own apostles. If these stories were to be fabricated, the LAST thing you want is for your eye-witness testimony to come from a woman, most wouldn't believe you off that alone.

And the greatest saint within Catholicism is Mary, a woman.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

37

u/TricellCEO Jul 28 '26

There was another passage (and I believe it was from Paul as well) where it initially reads something akin to “a wife is to be a slave to her husband”, which is then immediately followed by “and a husband is to be a slave to his wife.”

Yet a lot of Christians only see the first passage, proof being those fucking umbrellas.

15

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

I don’t recall the passage you’re talking about, but I do know that Ephesians 5:21 says that spouses are supposed to be subject to each other. Basically a husband is supposed to be subject to his wife in addition to a wife being subject to her husband.

12

u/TricellCEO Jul 28 '26

I think that’s the passage I am recalling.

Been a while since I took a class on the NT.

5

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

I’m currently studying theology, so it’s been more recent for me. But I still have trouble recalling specific verses (I’m much better at recalling broad theological concepts), and even if I know the verse word for word, I can’t remember what specific verse it is so that I can cite it. So I get it.

6

u/theaholeinthisstory Jul 28 '26

There's absolutely no way Paul intended to say there should be equality between men and women

17

u/HobbitWithShoes Jul 28 '26

Eh, there are progessive ways to read Paul. For one thing- his actions don't line up with his words in regards to things like "women should keep silent in the church" when he praises women like Pheobe, Pricilla and Junia for preaching, teaching, and being named an apostle. And a lot of more egalitarian Christians read Paul's work as contrasting common Roman belief by following it up with mutual love and submission.

I'm not saying the the misogynistic reading isn't there, or that it isn't the most common reading. Just that there are plenty of Christians who don't follow that particular reading.

→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

7

u/DementedPimento Jul 28 '26

Yeah, keep reading Paul. He’s not big on women.

9

u/woodland-strawberry Jul 28 '26

You should check out the debate going on between Biblical scholars about the disputed and undisputed Pauline letters, if you haven't already. Paul in the undisputed letters is more positive about women. Pseudo-Paul is less so. I'm fairly new to the topic myself but I just wanted to mention it

9

u/GigiLaRousse Jul 28 '26

I recall this from hanging with theology nerds (who included believing Christians, but also agnostics, atheists, and a Muslim) around 2010.

Listening to sincere people who know their shit debate this stuff is so interesting, and has also made me scoff at anyone who insists their interpretation of the Bible is clearly the only correct one.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/drlao79 Jul 28 '26

There isn't one way the Bible describes marriage (or anything else) because the Bible consists of multiple viewpoints from multiple authors over 500+ years. So inevitably when anyone tries to a construct "biblical" version of whatever there will be parts of the Bible they highlight and parts they subordinate.

20

u/IndependentAd2029 Jul 28 '26

It's pretty disingenuous to leave out:

Ephesians 5:22 "Wives should submit to their own husbands as they do to the Lord."

Ephesians 5:23 "The husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the head and savior of the church."

Ephesians 5:24 "Wives should be subject to their husbands in everything, just as the church submits to Christ."

The men are compared to God and Jesus, while the women are compared to objects. Husbands have to love while wives have to obey.

12

u/Plightz Jul 28 '26

Yeah agreed. People probably shouldn't tout the bible as their guide for what dudes should do to their wives.

15

u/muaddict071537 Jul 28 '26

I was only intending to respond to the specific attitude in this image that men have no obligation towards their wife’s happiness. I was just responding to that attitude and how it’s not the case based on what the Bible says. Those verses are relevant if you’re trying to have a discussion about the passage as a whole, but I wasn’t attempting to do that. I was only meaning to point out how the AI guy is wrong here, so I don’t think it’s necessarily disingenuous that I didn’t also mention the verses about wives.

→ More replies (9)

4

u/FroggyAssassin Jul 28 '26

Let's not forget 1 Timothy 2:12, "I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet".

→ More replies (8)

3

u/CowabungaCthulhu Jul 31 '26

Ephesians 5:22: "Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord."

Colossians 3:18-19: Repeats that wives should submit, while telling husbands not to be harsh with their wives.

It is absolutely Biblical. Women are second to men, under men, below men, however you want to put it, according to the Bible. There is a clear hierarchy. The reason it says this is because the book was written 2000+ years ago by men of the time. It is just fiction.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (33)

161

u/randomcomputer22 Jul 28 '26

“I hate my wife”

plz laugh

10

u/randomality77 Jul 30 '26

HA HA HA THAT IS SOME TOP-TIER COMEDY RIGHT THERE

- boomers, probably

4

u/Miserable-Diver7236 Jul 28 '26

I refuse ! I will DESTROY YOU NOW 

6

u/SmertriosPPD Jul 29 '26

more like "my wife hates me and me too"

→ More replies (1)

365

u/mothspiderr Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

modern marriage: healthy and blunt communication

biblical marriage: some asshat

34

u/ts20xx Jul 28 '26

Modern marriage: "we're getting a divorce"

Biblical marriage: "no officer, I don't know how rat poison could have ended up in my husband's coffee"

8

u/On_my_last_spoon Jul 28 '26

You joke, but this was much more common before divorce was easy. Aqua tofana was a thing for a reason.

7

u/ts20xx Jul 28 '26

Yes. That was the punchline of my joke. Thank you for explaining it.

→ More replies (1)

56

u/BlackSpidy Jul 28 '26

Honestly, so long as the problem is clearly communicated and I'm given parameters of improvement that are reasonable... I'd love to be told "I'm not happy with you" in marriage. And hey, if that's the start of the end because I find the changes desired are not reasonable, we can start the separation in a cordial and measured way.

Just imo

26

u/mothspiderr Jul 28 '26

no im with you. she’s not even saying “YOU make me upset” or “YOU make me unhappy” she’s saying “I AM unhappy with you.”

7

u/BlackSpidy Jul 28 '26

Yeah, exactly!

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Mister-Circus Jul 28 '26

Exactly this. Christianity is the struggle to live in a Christ-like manner. That asshat isn’t even attempting to. It’s the perfect example of using the Word of God as a weapon to justify their hatred.

5

u/xXAnoHitoXx Jul 28 '26

Biblical marriage isn't even this. This is some right-wing goes: i want to treat my wife like an object and ignore what she has to say, so I'll slab "Biblical" infront of it to convince others to do the same and get what I want.

9

u/Prudent-Audience619 Jul 28 '26

The verse is taken out of context. This is not at all what Christians believe in (at least the ones who are actually acting like a Christian)

6

u/mothspiderr Jul 28 '26

i understand that, i’m not mocking actual Biblical marriage, i’m mocking whoever thinks that Biblical marriage really is the image on the right

3

u/Suspicious_Dingo_426 Jul 28 '26

Sadly, I haven't encountered many Christians that actually act like Christians. They seem to be pretty thin on the ground, judging by what so-called Christian messaging seems to get the most amplification—and how little pushback it receives from other Christians. It's one of the reasons I'm no longer Christian.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/readwithjack Jul 28 '26

Biblically married dude is about to get Salisbury Steak & rat poison for dinner.

→ More replies (8)

129

u/NoNotice2137 Jul 28 '26

"I'm not happy with you"

"I don't care"

Dang, I really wonder why would less women want the church marriage nowadays

25

u/Jazzlike_Pound7742 Jul 28 '26

But it isn't biblical. The Bible tells me to love my wife as I love myself. So any man dismissive of his wife isn't a good Christian man, and is infact dismissive of himself. He and his wife are one.

A good Christian man will listen to the wisdom of his wife and will then make decisions that are best for both of them, not for him. A man who chooses to make decisions for himself and not for both he and his wife is a bad husband, biblical or otherwise.

18

u/lynypixie Jul 28 '26

A couple should make decisions together. They are a team.

I have been married 22 years. The idea of submission horrifies my husband as much as I.

7

u/TDS_isnt_real Jul 28 '26

Exactly. Been with my wife almost 17 years now and there’s no way I’d ever be with a woman that wasn’t my equal in every decision. A power imbalance isn’t a marriage to me, it’s something else.

I genuinely have trouble understanding “I love my wife” and “I make the decisions for both of us” being compatible. My children need guidance, not my spouse.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/EnvironmentNeith2017 Jul 28 '26

Those parts of the Bible don’t count /s

4

u/NoNotice2137 Jul 28 '26

I guess I should have specified that I meant church marriage according to them. I mean, my parents got married in church and they're fine because my dad isn't a douchebag

→ More replies (2)

117

u/Sleep_eeSheep Jul 28 '26

These posts always baffle me.

52

u/jesusholdmybeer Jul 28 '26

They dont make the point they think it does

42

u/phoenix_master42 Jul 28 '26

all the Republicans who say the female orgasm doesnt exist because their wife has never had one

14

u/BrownBannister Jul 28 '26

At least not with them.

4

u/Sleep_eeSheep Jul 28 '26

I don’t think they have a point, period.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/gimmebanter Jul 28 '26

I think they do, point being don't respect women, they are inferior and all that nonsense which is pretty much the only way to interpret biblical text unless you're doing some creative translation tricks.

The whole thing is absurd like any religious text and plays into people's emotional weaknesses

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

80

u/CreeperIsSorry Jul 28 '26

Conveniently cut out a good chunk of that Bible quote lmaoooo

8

u/peepingtomatoes Jul 28 '26

Ellipses doing some HEAVY lifting here.

15

u/ironangel2k4 Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

The sort of person who believes in these sorts of fairy tales doesn't have the prefrontal cortex development necessary to understand how doing this defeats their own argument.

To wit: If you have to heavily edit a passage to change its meaning, it is an admission that no passage actually exists that supports that meaning, because you could just use that one instead.

5

u/-Playful-Business- Jul 28 '26

While i find the comic/meme abhorrent and agree that many use the bible out of context... Let's, perhaps, not speak of all religious people as if they were brain damaged sponges. Religious extremists i agree, but, y'know. It aint pretty nor helpful nor virtuous to just shun others for being religious, especially if doing so doesn't hurt anybody.

3

u/Comprehensive_Pin565 Jul 31 '26

I dont think religous people have brain damage, and I also dislike when people say that. It's just dumb because humans can be convinced to do all kinds of terrible things without brain damage being involved. It's an attempt to cast people as "lesser" so they don't have to consider they might fall into the same trap.

But, I don't know if I think religon is harmless. Magical thinking is pretty dangerous, and supporting a religon like Christianity also carries water for some of the worst elements of it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/EndellionFox Jul 28 '26

real victims of family court posting hours

94

u/LastPlaceGuaranteed Jul 28 '26

The men who post this are all incels. Wonder why…

22

u/johnsolomon Jul 28 '26

Unsurprisingly it also takes the Bible verse out of context. It's not a statement about wives in general, it's specifically about Adam choosing to ignore God's explicit warning and follow Eve's suggestion instead. So it doesn't even make sense

3

u/CemeteryDweller7719 Jul 28 '26

I was just thinking that these things must be made to make incels feel better. The idea that you are supposed to go out, find a woman, marry her, and then hate her and treat her with contempt at all times… why? It always shows the "wrong way” to have a marriage, by being "whipped” by caring about the wife in any way, and the "right way” by openly hating the wife and not caring about her at all. What kind of weird recommendation is it to say get married to (essentially) punish a woman for life by treating her with contempt every opportunity you have for the audacity of being a woman that agreed to marry you…

→ More replies (1)

18

u/maneki_neko89 Jul 28 '26

Here’s the full verse, without that specific highlight and selective use of ellipses:

“And to the man[b] he said,
“Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life;”

Genesis 3:17

→ More replies (6)

18

u/Indicus124 Jul 28 '26

IDK every married family member tells me communication is key to a good marriage

4

u/Frost_Goldfish Jul 28 '26

No you don't get it. Key to good marriage is ignoring your wife and doing whatever you please, BUT first you need to ban no-fault divorce. I'm very smart

→ More replies (13)

16

u/TBTabby Jul 28 '26

Isn't it funny how God always commands people to do things they already wanted to do?

3

u/theaholeinthisstory Jul 28 '26

It's almost like, and hear me out, ancient people were trying to understand what we, today, call "human nature"

13

u/Intelligent_Swan1241 Jul 28 '26

Oh hey it’s the pedophile guy who believes in marrying children, according to his blog!

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Kyropinesis Jul 28 '26

remember when the king of england wanted a divorce so bad he made the entire country no longer catholic?

10

u/Minute987 Jul 28 '26

Dudes post shit like this and then complain about the "male loneliness epidemic".

9

u/Sad_Toe6678 Jul 28 '26

At least they are now being honest

6

u/-o-DildoGaggins-o- Jul 28 '26

Yeah, this is definitely more of a confession by OOP than anything else. He didn’t care, his wife left, and now he’s part of the “male loneliness epidemic.”

(Here’s a secret: Men like this are why there even is a “male loneliness epidemic.”)

3

u/Sad_Toe6678 Jul 28 '26

Facts hey!

8

u/chrimminimalistic Jul 28 '26

Wait. Is this meant to argue for or against "biblical marriage"?

→ More replies (3)

10

u/thewarmreinforcement Jul 28 '26

Which part of "I don't care" do you think is the biblical part exactly

→ More replies (2)

6

u/StabbyBoo Jul 28 '26

"Drive safe, honey!"
"FUCK YOUR LIES, BRIDE OF SATAN!" Reverses into street at full throttle, hits pole

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Independent-Name4478 Jul 28 '26

The type of people who say marital rape doesn’t exist 

→ More replies (2)

7

u/CuteComplaint5542 Jul 28 '26

But y male loneliness epidemic??? 😕

3

u/guidevocal82 Jul 28 '26

Sometimes I think we would know peace if we got rid of religion. John Lennon's Imagine and all that...

5

u/Psychological_Use586 Jul 28 '26

'i don't care' - the worst person you know.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ikannunAneeuQ Jul 28 '26

I love how they just pulled that quote out of context LOL idiots.

3

u/Coney_the_jumpy Jul 28 '26

So, "modern marriage" is infinitely better.

4

u/Chevanalee Jul 28 '26

Them: “Respecting your wife is a sin in Christianity!”

Also them: “why are so many people leaving the church?”

4

u/Slow_Degree345 Jul 28 '26

Imagine thinking communicating was bad for relationships.

21

u/LowContract4444 Jul 28 '26

Actually, left is biblical marriage.

Modern marriage would be the married couple "breaking up" like they're high schoolers.

True marriage is working together to fix things and stay together through anything, thick and thin except cheating.

Also Jesus said to love your wife as he loves the church. Not loving and respecting your wife is wrong.

10

u/Takamako Jul 28 '26

I mean, if everyone is okay and happy to break up, who cares? I've seen too many married couples miserable because "marriage is sacred and it's supposed to be hard".

→ More replies (6)

6

u/Hugh_Mann84 Jul 28 '26

Biblical marriage is polygamy, possibly with concubines on the side, where all the women are treated as less than dirt.

9

u/apexdryad Jul 28 '26

Except cheating. What about violent abuse? Or financial abuse? Or is it because wife beating is OK in religion? Is "thick or thin" you referring to the stick a man beats his wife with?

→ More replies (14)

6

u/CrapitalRadio Jul 28 '26

This is a bad take.

What if one partner punches the other one? That's not cheating. Should they try to work through it?

What if one partner finds out that the other is a serial murderer? That's not cheating.

What if one partner finds out that the other likes to torture neighborhood cats?

What if one partner has a habit of publicly humiliating their children and calling it "pranks?"

What if one partner has a gambling addiction and secretly gambles away all the other partner's life savings and inheritance from their parents and their children's college fund?

There are literally endless scenarios where staying would be damaging to everyone involved and that can't really be worked through. Cheating is pretty low on the list, honestly.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Player_Slayer_7 Jul 28 '26

See, here's the problem, OP. In the mind of whoever created this crap, the pair on the right wouldn't get divorced because they want the concept of divorce abolished.

3

u/dirk_gently21 Jul 28 '26

Surprisingly honest.

Normally you’d expect them to show a dutiful wife being submissive and subservient, and the man as the perfect unchallenged head of household.

Instead, she’s just as unhappy, maybe more so, and the biblical man is an uncaring jerk making zero efforts.

Amazing self awareness.

3

u/akiva23 Jul 28 '26

Adam's first wife left him by the way.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/CR1ZZ0 Jul 28 '26

The bible quote is reallly REALLY out of context, that it's starting to get ridiculous.

3

u/No_Aslume2509 Jul 28 '26

The one on the right would more likely would follow that I don’t care quote by threatening to raise his hand at her

3

u/Khalith Jul 28 '26

“Communication is good for relationships? Sounds like nonsense for me.”

3

u/IdontreadanyPMs Jul 28 '26

This is funny, idk why but just the way he is staring off into the distance when he says "i dont care" has got me laughing

3

u/Silenceisgrey Jul 28 '26

Crazy because genesis 3:17 deals with the consequences of eating from the tree of life and is nothing to do with marriage or women

3

u/No-Sprinkles6491 Jul 29 '26

as a Christian this is terrible (the husband is supposed to be the protector not the incel asshole)

7

u/Raptmembrane Jul 28 '26

So sigma 

8

u/Synecdochic Jul 28 '26

Sigma?

I hardly know 'a!

9

u/SalmonPrince Jul 28 '26

Gee, I wonder who wrote the Bible. Men, guided by an allegedly male God? Omg woah that's so crazy.

3

u/deadassstho Jul 28 '26

wait you mean men wrote a book where men get all the benefits and women get the shit end of the stick in everything? noooooo it can’t be 

5

u/Forceofwillplay Jul 28 '26 edited Jul 28 '26

That AI slop was made by someone who has never talked to a woman other than his mom or sister.

3

u/Terrible_Law8327 Jul 28 '26

At this point, religion is a blanket for lazy men

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Successful_Mud8596 Jul 28 '26

Classic Christian sexist bullshit. Not at all surprising to see

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Sadoguricappu Jul 28 '26

Oh right i remember when EVE EAT THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT NOT CAUSE SHE WAS TRICK OR SOMETHING.

2

u/Dash_Harber Jul 28 '26

God, I can't imagine being so scared and pathetic that you purposely surround yourself with weak and submissive folks so you can always feel special.

If my partner is a firebreathibg Amazon who kicks ass and takes names and males the big bucks and knows how to deal with tons of situation, that's great. Not only does it make our family stronger, it also gives me motivation to be better, and that means a stronger unit.

2

u/NfamousKaye Jul 28 '26

I’m gonna guess there was more to that quote they conveniently left out.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/RShini Jul 28 '26

remember part of their deal is to prevent divorce (forgetting that the murder/disappearance rate of married men gone down when divorce became easily accessible)

→ More replies (1)

2

u/EpsilonBear Jul 28 '26

And three weeks later, Jedidiah there meets with a very tragic, very bloody “accident”.

Really, someone’s gotta do something about these guns that keep shooting their owners in the back of the head when they try to clean them. I mean, that’s just poor engineering.