Recently the government has started talking about this idea of the "fourth republic" again, but this ideology or belief that is trying to be pushed doesnt make sense for a number of reasons.
For starters people in the current republic dont even see it as the third republic, they see it as the second, the first being the first republic in 1918. No body really says that the Armenian SSR was a republic, they see it as a part of the soviet union.
Pashinyan says that the current republic was founded on the logic of conflict, and that the fourth is founded on the logic of peace. However in my opinion the country wasnt founded on the logic of conflict, but on the victory of the 90s war. It wasnt until after that where nothing was done in the country is what led to more conflict. The fourth republic being founded on the logic of peace also doesnt make sense, its moreso "quietness" than actual peace, the August 2025 document isnt the actual peace treaty.
Another thing is that holding a consitutional change is extremely merky, Civil contract has 64 seats out of 105, which means they need to hold a referendum for a constitution change and its important to consider, just how many people would really vote in the referendum if they give into the demand of changing the part of the consitiution that mentions Artsakh.
The consitution refers to the declaration of independence, which then refers to the reunification of Armenia and Artsakh. This part entirely depends on perspective, from the perspective of a regular Armenian, it doesnt have a logic of conflict since Artsakh and Armenia are our homes. But from an international perspective it raises problems since the world recognizes the borders of Armenia and azerbaijan as what they recognize it as.
The current border delimitation has also shown that they can give and take territories while maintaining the number of the size. If you look at the delimited part of the border in Tavush, it is not the actual border line that you may see on google maps or any map, but its a new line that was agreed upon.
This also causes a problem with the "real Armenia" idea. If they can pick and chose which parts of the border are where as long as the size of the number stays the same, then what exactly is the "real Armenia?" Not to mention how the exclaves are another issue where they can chose to swap them after delimitation, but lets be honest azerbaijan wouldnt agree to that as their exclaves are politically more important than having Artsvashen, and there hasnt been any new sections being delimited as of right now.
What does everyone else think?