r/Astronomy Mar 27 '20

Mod Post Read the rules sub before posting!

903 Upvotes

Hi all,

Friendly mod warning here. In r/Astronomy, somewhere around 70% of posts get removed. Yeah. That's a lot. All because people haven't bothered reading the rules or bothering to understand what words mean. So here, we're going to dive into them a bit further.

The most commonly violated rules are as follows:

Pictures

Our rule regarding pictures has three parts. If your post has been removed for violating our rules regarding pictures, we recommend considering the following, in the following order:

  1. All pictures/videos must be original content.

If you took the picture or did substantial processing of publicly available data, this counts. If not, it's going to be removed.

2) You must have the acquisition/processing information.

This needs to be somewhere easy for the mods to verify. This means it can either be in the post body or a top level comment. Responses to someone else's comment, in your link to your Instagram page, etc... do not count.

3) Images must be exceptional quality.

There are certain things that will immediately disqualify an image:

  • Poor or inconsistent focus
  • Chromatic aberration
  • Field rotation
  • Low signal-to-noise ratio
  • Images that don't fill the frame because you were shooting through an eyepiece

However, beyond that, we cannot give further clarification on what will or will not meet this criteria for several reasons:

  1. Technology is rapidly changing
  2. Our standards are based on what has been submitted recently (e.g, if we're getting a ton of moon pictures because it's a supermoon, the standards go up to prevent the sub from being spammed)
  3. Listing the criteria encourages people to try to game the system

So yes, this portion is inherently subjective and, at the end of the day, the mods are the ones that decide and the mods are under no obligation to explain this decision to you.

If you are informed that your post was removed because of image quality, arguing about the quality will not be successful. In particular, there are a few arguments that are false or otherwise trite which we simply won't tolerate. These include:

"You let that image that I think isn't as good stay up"

  • See above about how the standards are fluid.

"Pictures have to be NASA quality"

  • They don't.

"You have to have thousands of dollars of equipment"

  • You don't. Technique matters.

"This is a really good photo given my equipment"

  • The standard is "exceptional". Not "exceptional for my equipment".

"This isn't being friendly to beginner astrophotographers"

  • Correct. To keep the sub from being spammed by low quality and low effort posts, this sub has standards.

"My post was getting a lot of upvotes"

  • Upvotes are not an "I get to break the rules" card.

Using the above arguments will not wow mods into suddenly approving your image. It will result in a ban.

Trying to argue with the mods using bad arguments isn't going to fly.

Lastly, it should be noted that we do allow astro-art in this sub. Obviously, it won't have acquisition information, but the content must still be original and mods get the final say on whether on the quality (although we're generally fairly generous on this).

Questions

This rule basically means you need to do your own research before posting.

  • If we look at a post and immediately have to question whether or not you did a Google search, your post will get removed.
  • If you asked Chat GPT or any other LLM, your post will be removed (see our rule regarding sources).
  • If your post is asking for generic or basic information, your post will get removed.
  • If your post is using basic terms incorrectly because you haven't bothered to understand what the words you're using mean, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a question based on a basic misunderstanding of the science, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a complicated question with a specific answer but didn't give the necessary information to be able to answer the question because you haven't even figured out what the parameters necessary to approach the question are, your post will get removed.

To prevent your post from being removed, tell us specifically what you've tried. Just saying "I GoOgLeD iT" doesn't cut it.

  • What search terms did you use?
  • In what way do the results of your search fail to answer your question?
  • What did you understand from what you found and need further clarification on that you were unable to find?

Furthermore, when telling us what you've tried, we will be very unimpressed if you use sources that are prohibited under our source rule (social media memes, YouTube, AI, etc...).

As with the rules regarding pictures, the mods are the arbiters of how difficult questions are to answer. If you're not happy about that and want to complain that another question was allowed to stand, then we will invite you to post elsewhere with an immediate and permanent ban.

Object ID

We'd estimate that only 1-2% of all posts asking for help identifying an object actually follow our rules. Resources are available in the rule relating to this. If you haven't consulted the flow-chart and used the resources in the stickied comment, your post is getting removed. Seriously. Use Stellarium. It's free. It will very quickly tell you if that shiny thing is a planet which is probably the most common answer. The second most common answer is "Starlink". That's 95% of the ID posts right there that didn't need to be a post.

Do note that many of the phone apps in which you point your phone to the sky and it shows you what you are looing at are extremely poor at accurately determining where you're pointing. Furthermore, the scale is rarely correct. As such, this method is not considered a sufficient attempt at understanding on your part and you will need to apply some spatial reasoning to your attempt.

Pseudoscience

The mod team of r/astronomy has several mods with degrees in the field. We're very familiar with what is and is not pseudoscience in the field. And we take a hard line against pseudoscience. Promoting it is an immediate ban. Furthermore, we do not allow the entertaining of pseudoscience by trying to figure out how to "debate" it (even if you're trying to take the pro-science side). Trying to debate pseudoscience legitimizes it. As such, posts that entertain pseudoscience in any manner will be removed.

Outlandish Hypotheticals

This is a subset of the rule regarding pseudoscience and doesn't come up all that often, but when it does, it usually takes the form of "X does not work according to physics. How can I make it work?" or "If I ignore part of physics, how does physics work?"

Sometimes the first part of this isn't explicitly stated or even understood (in which case, see our rule regarding poorly researched posts) by the poster, but such questions are inherently nonsensical and will be removed.

Sources

ChatGPT and other LLMs are not reliable sources of information. Any use of them will be removed. This includes asking if they are correct or not.

Content

Due to the profusion of AI slop apps, we're no longer allowing apps at all. No, we don't care if you're wanting a "review". No we don't care if they're free. No we don't care if you put it in a website.

Bans

We almost never ban anyone for a first offense unless your post history makes it clear you're a spammer, troll, crackpot, etc... Rather, mods have tools in which to apply removal reasons which will send a message to the user letting them know which rule was violated. Because these rules, and in turn the messages, can cover a range of issues, you may need to actually consider which part of the rule your post violated. The mods are not here to read to you.

If you don't, and continue breaking the rules, we'll often respond with a temporary ban.

In many cases, we're happy to remove bans if you message the mods politely acknowledging the violation. But that almost never happens. Which brings us to the last thing we want to discuss.

Behavior

We've had a lot of people breaking rules and then getting rude when their posts are removed or they get bans (even temporary). That's a violation of our rules regarding behavior and is a quick way to get permabanned. To be clear: Breaking this rule anywhere on the sub will be a violation of the rules and dealt with accordingly, but breaking this rule when in full view of the mods by doing it in the mod-mail will 100% get you caught. So just don't do it.

Claiming the mods are "power tripping" or other insults when you violated the rules isn't going to help your case. It will get your muted for the maximum duration allowable and reported to the Reddit admins.

And no, your mis-interpretations of the rules, or saying it "was generating discussion" aren't going to help either.

While these are the most commonly violated rules, they are not the only rules. So make sure you read all of the rules.


r/Astronomy 8h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Summer Milkyway above open air archeological museum

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

Some places are worth visiting even at night. I photographed this one in nearby open air archaeological museum. Hope you'll agree.

Shot on Sony a7RV, Viltrox 27mm f1.2 Pro and with help of Syrp Genie Mini II pan&tilt kit. Edited in PTGui, Siril, PS and LR. Exposure info - 20 frame panorama, each at 10s, f1.2 and ISO 1600.


r/Astronomy 5h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Apparent Size Comparison – Deep Sky Objects

Thumbnail
gallery
276 Upvotes

Here are two posters I created to show the relative apparent size of famous DSOs

All images in the two posters have been captured using the following setup:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: William Optics Zenithstar 61II + Field Flattener FLAT61A
Focal/Aperture: 360 mm @ f/5.9
Guide scope: William Optics Uniguide 32mm
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM mini + ASIair Pro

All images have been calibrated, stacked, and processed in PixInsight. Blending of all the images and posters creation done in GIMP.


r/Astronomy 9h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Messier 27

Post image
418 Upvotes

Dumbbell nebula :)

Spent quite some time on it, collecting hydrogen alpha when the moon was not allowing for anything else

36.5 hours Halpha, 3nm Antlia filter

19 hours OIII, 12nm Astronomik filter

Romania, Bortle 4.5

Processed in Pixinsight, Seti Astro suite, GraXpert, Photoshop.

IMX 533 mono, -15°

Newton 200/1200

EQ6R


r/Astronomy 10h ago

Astrophotography (OC) NGC 7023

Post image
185 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 13h ago

Astrophotography (OC) IC 1396A - Elephant Trunk Nebula

Post image
279 Upvotes

9.2 hours total integration on the Elephant Trunk Nebula Imaged 14 & 19 April, 2026 in Beverley, East Riding of Yorkshire, UK

High resolution image and full integration details on Astrobin.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astro Art (OC) I made a procedural Black hole with Blender 3d - No AI

Thumbnail
gallery
2.5k Upvotes

Well, I wanted to show you my latest renders before I sleep. I made this black hole without following any tutorials. I tried to create a black hole that looks beautiful, and at the same time doesn't disappoint astronomy fans too much :))

Hope you'll like it.


r/Astronomy 10h ago

Astrophotography (OC) I captured the wings of the Dumbell nebula!

Post image
56 Upvotes

Wings of the Dumbell nebula is a very dimm structure compared to bright core, that I almost overexposed by pushing the gain up to 150

Telescope: Dwarf 3;

Exposure: 5 hours;

Subs: 60s 150gain;

Duo band filter;

Processed in Siril;

Bortle 5;

Compressed for reddit


r/Astronomy 16h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Complete Messier Catalog (2024)

Post image
168 Upvotes

Here's the Messier Catalog I completed in 2024

This poster presents all 110 Messier objects for a total of 178 hours of total integration, with an average of 2h15 / target.

I've also created an interactive PDF version of this poster with pop-up descriptions of each object as you mouse-over the images: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GSopNt4JMNElVlxXRyDobjgOU0Ze1Q0V/view?usp=sharing

All images have been captured with the following equipment:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: William Optics Zenithstar 61II + Field Flattener FLAT61A
Focal/Aperture: 360 mm @ f/5.9
Guide scope: William Optics Uniguide 32mm
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM mini + ASIair Pro

All images have been stacked and processed in PixInsight. The Poster was done in LibreOffice Impress.


r/Astronomy 19h ago

Astrophotography (OC) NGC 7000 North American Nebula

Post image
210 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 8h ago

Astro Research A supermassive black hole erupted in X-rays, and its radio jets followed 300 days later

Thumbnail
phys.org
11 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 20h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146) and the surrounding dark nebula

Post image
68 Upvotes

My latest image of the Cocoon Nebula, IC 5146, surrounded by the huge amount of dark interstellar dust running through this part of Cygnus.

I wanted to capture more than just the bright Cocoon itself, so the processing was aimed at bringing out the much fainter dusty structure and dark nebula surrounding it while still retaining the dense background star field.

**Equipment**

• Askar 107PHQ + 0.7× reducer (~524mm, f/4.9)

• ZWO ASI2600 Duo

• Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro

• Optolong L-eNhance

• UV/IR-cut filter

• PHD2 guiding

**Light frames**

• UV/IR: 29 × 120s = 58 minutes

• L-eNhance: 46 × 240s = 3h 04m

• Total light integration: **4h 02m**

**Calibration**

• 30 × 120s darks for the UV/IR data

• 30 × 240s darks for the L-eNhance data

• 50 flats per filter

• 50 dark-flats per filter

The UV/IR and L-eNhance data were calibrated and stacked separately. The broadband UV/IR data provided most of the natural star field and faint dusty structure, while the L-eNhance data was used to strengthen the Hα/OIII emission from the Cocoon.

Processing involved gradient/background correction, noise reduction, separate star and starless processing, stretching and then combining the two filter datasets. A fair bit of care was needed with the stretch because pushing the background too far very quickly makes the faint dust overly contrasty.

The part I particularly like is the dark nebula itself. The Cocoon is obviously the bright centrepiece, but once the surrounding dust starts appearing you realise just how much structure there is across the entire field.

**IC 5146 – Cocoon Nebula, Cygnus**

**Total integration: 4h 02m**


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) NGC 6193

Post image
373 Upvotes

NGC 6193, 2 hours and 50 minutes of integration with a Tecnosky AG90 90/450 f/5 telescope, ZWO ASI 6200MC camera, L-ENHANCE filter, there are 17 shots of 600 seconds each, I processed with Pixinsight trying to extract as much signal as possible and zoomed in on this nebula, I then continued with Photoshop using the Camera Raw filter to eliminate the haze. All data and shots were acquired with Telescope Network


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astro Research The Sun at 80,000 K, colored by Doppler shift [OC]

Post image
81 Upvotes

This is a full-Sun mosaic from NASA's IRIS spacecraft, taken in the Si IV 1394 Å line on 2014 May 12, near the peak of solar cycle 24.

It isn't a photograph. IRIS is a slit spectrograph, so the image was assembled from 1002 separate raster steps and took roughly 17 hours to complete, from 09:53 UT on May 12 to 03:17 UT the next morning. Every pixel holds a full spectrum, 41 wavelength samples across the line.

The 80,000 K in the title is where Si IV forms: the transition region, the remarkably thin layer separating the 6,000 K chromosphere from the million-degree corona above it.

The color encodes each pixel's spectrum rather than being an aesthetic choice. I ran every line profile through CIE color matching, so hue is Doppler shift across ±75 km/s, with blue moving toward us and red moving away, and lightness is intensity. Green means the plasma is essentially at rest along our line of sight. None of this is visible to the eye. Si IV sits at 139 nm in the far ultraviolet, so any color here is a deliberate mapping.

The speckled patch near disk center is the South Atlantic Anomaly. It's the region where Earth's inner radiation belt dips closest to the surface, and spacecraft passing through get showered with energetic particles that strike the detector directly. IRIS crosses it about once per orbit, so over a 17-hour mosaic a few blocks of raster steps come back buried in particle hits. Those blocks are left in rather than painted over. The short black bars are dropped raster steps.

Data: NASA/LMSAL IRIS, publicly available here. Processed in Python with astropy, named-arrays, colorsynth for the spectrum-to-color mapping, and astroscrappy to remove cosmic-ray hits.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: [Topic] question, can anyone tell me how to find this pulsar map in .svg format?

Post image
99 Upvotes

I know this may seem like a trivial question, but I've been searching for a Voyager pulsar map in .svg format in google or other sides for my own use for a long time, but I couldn't find it anywhere.

I wanted to ask if anyone has it, or a program or code to generate this map in .svg format.

With all due respect for you all


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: [Privately funded large telescopes] The Archenhold Observatory in Berlin, longest refractor since 1896, privately funded

Thumbnail
gallery
341 Upvotes

Yesterday I visited the Archenhold Observatory in Berlin, built in 1896 with 250000 German gold marks in private donations to Friedrich Simon Archenhold’s crowdfunding project as a public telescope for the Berlin Trade Fair. That’s $2.5 million in today’s USD! It is still the longest refractor telescope, at 21 m with a 68 cm lens, and most likely the fastest to rotate. Its still-original electromechanics let it rotate around the observer, who stays in the center—much different from common constructions, where you have to move around with a ladder. Unfortunately, a microcrack was recently noticed, and currently it can’t be rotated. The surrounding building was added in 1909 and is famous for being the location of Albert Einstein’s first public lecture on the theory of general relativity on June 2, 1915.

More about its history: https://www.planetarium.berlin/en/archenhold-observatory/history and https://astw.de/astronomiegeschichte/anfaenge_riesenfernrohr.php


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Wide field view of the Crescent and Bubble nebulas

Post image
133 Upvotes

Taken between 10-13th August 2026 in Argenteuil, France. 212x 300s frames for a total of 17h40. That was a very difficult target for me, as it was the first multiple nights imaging I tried and I hoped to get a reasonably good view of the Bubble nebula. It's a very faint planetary nebula with another brighter nebula in the background. It's so hard to see that it was only discovered by an amateur astronomer in 2007! In the end my Bortle 7 sky did its thing, but you can actually see it if you know where to look (check Astrobin to get the full resolution image, it's actually to the bottom left of the Crescent nebula).

Telescope: William Optics Redcat 51

Mount: ZWO AM5N

Camera: ZWO ASI2600MC, Gain 100

Filter wheel: ZWO EFW 5x50

Autofocuser: ZWO EAF

Filter: Optolong L-enHance

Guide Scope: ZWO 30mm Mini

Guide Camera: ZWO ASI120MM Mini

Controller: ZWO ASIAIR Plus

Calibration frames: 20 darks, 20 bias each night

Processing: PixInsight (Drizzle, BlurXterminator, NoiseXterminator, StarXterminator, NarrowBandNormalization) and Photoshop (final color adjustments)

Bortle Class: 7


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Helix Nebula

Post image
76 Upvotes

Acquisition:

Around 5.5 hours worth of 180s subs fully calibrated and dithered.

Equipment:

Evostar 72ED, iEXOS 100, ASI 533MC, Optolong L-Ultimate, 0.85x reducer+flattener, rotator+filter holder, SVBony 40mm F/4 guidescope, ASI 662MC guide camera with pale yellow no.8 and UV/IR cut filters.

Processing:

-Drizzle preprocessing and stacking in Siril;

-Background extraction in GraXpert;

-SPCC in Siril;

-Deconvolution in Siril;

-Denoise in GraXpert;

-Extract HII and OIII data in Siril and generate HOO image;

-Background normalization;

-GHS and black point adjustments;

-Final denoising in GraXpert.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) NGC 7239 - Helix Nebula 🧬

Post image
43 Upvotes

90 1 Minute Subs from a Bortle 8

Telescope - Svbony Sv503 70mm
Mount - Skywatcher EQ AL55i
Camera - ZWO Asi585 MC Pro
Filter - Svbony Sv240
Processed in PixInsight


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) M104 -- The Sombrero Galaxy's Dust Lanes in LRGB with 40+ hours

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: [Topic] “Live” Milky Way Bortle 8

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

215 Upvotes
• SVBONY SV183 Telescope Filter:IR Pass Filter 2 Inch 685nm Reduce the Effects of Seeing for Planetary Photography Contrast Enhancement  
• iPhone 16 pro max default camera app. Video edited in Lightroom mobile to bring some details out.  
• normal camera mode  
• Milky Way bortle 8   
• Televue filter adapter 48mm and phone holder  
• Pvs14 Gen 3 monocular:  
• Photocathode Sensitivity: 2058  
• FOM: 2700  
• SNR: 37.5  
• EBI: .7  
• Halo: .7  
• Center resolution: 72  
• Unfilmed/filmless  
• Gated 18UM 11769 style

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Moon

Thumbnail
gallery
274 Upvotes

Moon photo taken 8/30/26 from Houston, Texas with Sony a7R V through Takahashi TSA-120 telescope with Vernonscope Dakin 2.4x barlow on ZWO AM5. Best 50% stack of 2,400 RAW file images with remote trigger. Aligned in PIPP, stacked in AutoStakkert 4, processed in Photoshop.


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Other: [Topic] PHYS.Org: Pulsar wind nebula inside supernova remnant explored with Chandra

Thumbnail
phys.org
8 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: Processing Veil Nebula - BX4 vs BX5

Post image
26 Upvotes

Thank you everyone for the feedback on my earlier post where I was comparing background extracted/autostretched data vs processed data that used BX ML5 as part of the process. Many of you pointed that was apples to oranges.

This time I've applied the same steps to the BX ML4 image on the left and BX ML5 image on the right - that is the only difference. The difference of course become subtle, but I'd maintain it is visible.

Happy to hear your thoughts on this comparison, and apologies again on the previous comparison

EDIT: it seems like you might not see much of a difference unless you download the image and open it separately, at least on mobile devices


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Saturn from my 6" Dobsonian

Post image
312 Upvotes
  • Telescope: Bresser Messier 6" Dobsonian 150/1200
  • Camera: ZWO ASI224MC
  • 2.5x Barlow
  • Took 1500 images, processed through PIPP, Autostakkert, and Registax