r/dndnext • u/Weak_Lion5326 • 1h ago
Discussion After all this talk - which concepts make sense as their own classes? Which definitely don't?
I did some quick googling, and found a lot of classes that used to exist in D&D - I'm just going to go ahead and assume they aren't all unique enough to be their own class. But, I also find it difficult to believe that there isn't a single class in here at least as different from current classes as current classes are from each other.
Not expecting anyone to care about the whole list, but is there anything familiar from it people would say would make sense as a subclass or wouldn't make sense as only a subclass?
- Warlord
- Warden
- Truenamer
- Totemist
- Swordsage
- Swordmage (are these two genuinely different classes?)
- Shaman
- Seeker
- Runepriest
- Psychic Warrior
- Psion
- Ninja
- Invoker
- Incarnate
- Factotum
- Duskblade
- Dread Necromancer
- Dragonfire Adept
- Crusader
- Binder
- Beguiler
- Battlemind
- Avenger
- Ardent
- Archivist