Some of those moments seem very dangerous without provoking much reaction from cameraman or miner but admittedly I know nothing of mining.

There's also some weird jump forward in time at 9sec accompanied with weird lighting shifts above the miner in that sequence.

Was just scrolling on insta for a minute when I randomly came across this. Apparently this company posted some ai video or picture and this is the apology they made. It's a little suspicious to me with that format and everything. Is it Ai?

Honestly? Not sure.

Everyone is saying how amazing this is and how incredible it is that they even see a bird in the wave. First off, seems odd how the wave folds on itself then also that, yes you can see a bird. I think AI.

The author has NO social media or online presence except for promoting the book.
I’ve only found out about this through ads while scrolling social media.
It’s only sold through one very specific publisher.
The photo of the author and her name appears very generic.
She doesn’t appear to have any other books and never posts info about book signings or events.
All her posts appear to have the AI generated short snappy sentence style.
The book cover and photos in the social media posts are clearly AI generated.
What debut author accidentally prints way too many copies of a book? Don’t debut authors have to pay for copies to be published?
There is an option on the website to multi-buy copies for a discount - is this normal for puzzle books?

My school distributed this Class 10 Science worksheet covering physical and chemical properties of acids, but I genuinely cannot tell if it is AI-generated or designed by someone operating on pure chaos. Idk why it has Windows XP desktop frame, 2000s hot air balloons, leaping dolphins, and rainbows surrounding chemistry questions. The text and questions are perfectly legible and accurate, making me super confused. Is this generated by an AI model trained on weird stock art, or just some teacher's childhood dream?

-There are too many inconsistencies in the lines of the hair and the clothes
-The anatomy of the hand looks weird
-The lines of the stone details in the background are all twisted
-The perspective of the stairs is not simetrical
-The colors of the stained glass bleed into one another and the details of it also seem like jumble of lines

The publishing house and the alleged illustrator already came forward with “proof” that it isn’t AI but it’s just a video of photoshop layers.

I left a review of a cafe and noted that I didn't like that pictures on their menu looked AI generated. The owner responded pretty defensively saying they paid for a professional photoshoot, so I ran them through deepai and it came back 97% fake.

This is the first time I've ever done this but 97% feels pretty open and shut to me. So was I a jerk or are they lying?

My reasoning is perfectly clear ice and the most symmetrical strawberries and coffee beans of all time.

It has come to my feed many times and it looks very AI to me... Or am I wrong here? I saw some posts using this video to as for flood help donations which makes it 10x worse. Pls let me know if I'm not just tripping and this definitely is AI

Is this ai? Was looking for different perspectives references but someone commented ai. The coloring and the eyes look ai generated but its looks weirdly drawn , Is this ai? Was looking for different perspectives references but someone commented ai. The coloring and the eyes look ai generated but its looks weirdly drawn

My aunt sent this in family chat about floods happening in Phoenix. I immediately thought it was ai generated but sometimes it’s hard to explain clues or what makes it seem like ai.

Can anyone help me identify and point out specific details that show it is in fact ai generated?

It’s also completely possible that I am wrong and it is not ai generated

This painting looks very suspicious to me. The poses feel weird and make no sense for a portrait like this. Not to mention the huge difference in art style from the rest of the artwork. Rest of the artwork looks human made tho

it just has an ai generated look to it, it might be the piss filter or that it looks a little too smooth but i can’t find anything obvious

check out the insta- https://www.instagram.com/elizondomedicalgroup?igsi=NmgyazBiZGlwN3Fh

just stumbled on this texas based medical practice, and it seems like from some (but not all) of their reels, they're having AI generate videos of the doctor based on actual photos/videos of him?? i can't fully tell but here is what convinces me:

- the movement of his clothing throughout the videos -- when he moves his arms his top seems to flex and has a wobbly edge, and the folds/shadows don't necessarily follow the flexing of the edge itself.
- the lighting on his face/expressions -- the shadows on his nose stay static when he talks despite his eyes and lips moving and their shadows changing.
- his jewelry -- in this video his bracelet seems to be stiff until he bumps his hands together, at which point it is flexible. this same thing happens in other videos.
- bonus: he has two mics clipped to him in some settings??

would love your insight!

I have nothing other than the feeling of this being AI and some weird art choices in places. This is from a Dutch theme park I love with all my heart. I know they use AI in places, they say they do... I just genuinely can't tell anymore and I hate it.

I can't download any of the other pictures but heres the post .

The angle of the axe is weird, the ragged edge of the templar's cloak barely makes sense, the castle in the distance is funky. There's just so much off about it to me

The font here, especially in the OUTDOOR THEATRE under the stars! portion looks textbook. I'd say cut and dry, but the OP is in the comments saying that they pay their artists. I'm thinking maybe they shouldn't (if their artists are turning in fradulent work).

The snakes bodies don’t really make sense to me, I’m really unsure if it’s just the “abstract style” of them. I had to stop colouring the turtle because it just confused me so much, again I’m unsure if it’s just so abstract in style that my brain just isn’t picking up on how the body is supposed to be? I’ve been collecting this book series, so I really want to know if these pages might be ai or not. Please help so I know if I should stop collecting them!

- The moose charging/woman falling looks weird
- moose and dogs have no shadow but woman and house do
- she sprays the bear spray over the dog and then walks through the area and neither seem bothered