r/SeriousConversation • u/Colonel_Dent • 4h ago
Serious Discussion Do I have the right terminology?
Lately, I've been thinking about a framework I call scarcity vs abundance environments for us humans. In short, most of our lives (especially here in America) we are in scarcity mode and we usually have competition - to get into schools, in school itself, work life and so on. When we encounter people, we usually find them to be self-protective, closed. Many purely social social experiences can have this quality as well.
In contrast, we also find ourselves in environments - usually when we're part of some collective activity - where the scarcity starts to be forgotten/recedes into the background and a group shifts into abundance mode. What was zero sum becomes greater than the sum of the parts. My most recent experience with this was at a concert. Once everyone settled in, everyone's interests became 100% aligned on having as much fun as possible in order to vibe with the band (and inspire them). People became way more open. The more an individual contributed, the more everyone got out of it. I've noticed the same dynamics in other locales as well - group exercise for example.
The terminology I most used before would be something like "it had a good vibe" to refer to abundance and maybe "toxic" for scarcity. But I've realized that there's benefit to being more fine-grained than that. I really like abundance environments and I'd like to be able to seek out more of them. I'm highly conscious of when an environment has moved into an abundance mode, and I'm trying to be in abundance mode as much as I can.
I'm also interested in thinking about the nuances of this framework. One type of activity could just as easily be scarcity or abundance (think of an overcrowded concert) however certain things (music for example) have abundance properties. Being part of a group is a requirement, but not a guarantee. Candidly I wonder if part of this is awakening our dormant hunter-gatherer selves.