This is pretty funny. Of course this person speaks on behalf of their wife. "AI is the only choice."

I've explained this time and again, but let's explain this again. Disability is irrelevant in the AI argument.

Here are the reasons:

• I cannot see disability in slop.
• If disability is specified, I will still give my objective opinion regarding usage of AI.
• Disability has nothing to do with the unethical nature of AI.
• I will always stand alongside people who are disabled and who were negatively affected by AI.

What did these people do before AI became a thing?

Also, just have to love the tactic here:

"Buy my wife the accessibility tools, if you don't, you are a hypocrite and argument over."

Funny how this one felt entitled to someone else's money. Of course people who use AI feel entitled to other peoples' art.

Then again, it is easy to be generous with something that is not yours.

Like it's fine if you just post in the AI gamedev subreddit and stuff but he was going around breaking several other subreddits rules regarding not promoting your game(s) and not posting heavily AI generated games. Regarding that last part, the AI disclosure on his games steam page is long enough I could scroll trough it rather than the few sentences I usually see.

And they also some how claim the made the worlds first AI game. Meanwhile I just find it embarrassing that AI ais apparently supposed to be awesome and going to make everyone super productive... meanwhile his AI slop game was released in 2025 and it's STILL in early access somehow.

Ive seen a lot of AI pros say that ai is the only way people with disabilities can make art and i just have the funniest first hand experience to dismantle it. I have selective mutism and a kind of speaking problem which is to put simply, like dislexia but for your mouth (me no speak or think good sometimes, but i can use drawings or writing to still "say" stuff) and traditional art has been a thing i like for a while. I never got into using AI because when i did try the firat time, i COULDNT because my head wasnt able to form a coherent sentence that could make what i wanted. I would be like "okay computer.... uhhh... i want a uhhhh a kitty but.... like.... more meow?" And it would churn out some slop and i would go "what no, puter, make kitty more meow!!" And it just wouldnt get what i was trying to say. Ive been able to draw things by myself because i dont have to make it into words first because sometimes my brain just does not think in words and just shows me the drawing before i draw it. I guess you could say ai is too hard for me 😭😭😭

First image is a screenshot of a comment I received on my post on r/Ai_art_is_not_art saying that even simple doodles require more effort than AI slop (which is true), the second image is one of those doodles I posted that I did on my school work. Third image is a recent proper art piece I finished just to prove that human made art is far better than AI (we already know this but fuck it)

Genuinely what is this person even trying to say? What are they on about? First AI bro I've gotten in my comment section, spouting some absolute buuuullshit and then trying to call me untalented. It wasn't meant to be high quality? It's literally a doodle? You moron?

Also saying that I lack originality and telling me to use my own methods is genuinely so hypocritical, I cracked up reading this shit.

Ad absurdum, a debate tactic where you take an argument and stretch it to its most extreme form.

In this case, the argument was that their "talent" goes away when electricity goes away. The "counter argument" to that was to take away all the limbs and enough muscle control so art couldn't be made using the mouth either.

This isn't a proper counter argument, because of the absurdity of it. Yeah, if you take virtually all functionality from a person, of course they aren't going to be able to make art. All it takes for prompters to have their "talent" taken away is a power spike, or data centers going offline or whatever.

Also, why not just make the person braindead at that point?

This doesn't invalidate the original argument either, it's basically just "See I took everything you could possibly use to make art, so your talent can go away as well.".

Let's also not forget they hate "inspiration porn" of disabled people making art, but they are more than willing to use the most extreme case to try and prove a point, which it didn't, it just made them look like an asshole.

It goes without saying that if anti AI people were / are actually encouraging people to make AI csam material that's abhorrent but I have never seen any anti AI person do something even remotely close to that. So I think they just made it up or something.

some ai bros may use so called bs ‘proofs’ against anti ais, but most of them r just ironic as shit.

I hate how AI doesn’t understand what I MADE and fucking slops it for no reason. I HATE AI SO MUCH. GODDDDDD, PEOPLE LIKE THIS MAKE ME MAD. ‘Tell me which looks better’ my pic is in the second slide. It’s meant to be a Spamtenna swap and that’s his Neo form

Maybe the baiters were the ones who baited along the way (what am I talking about?)

"i was being deadass" is in reference to my original comment, i was genuinely curious to see what this guy was supposedly cooking up but when he told me to send him a dm request so he could show me he just said this instead 😭 i probably should have guessed he wouldn't be saying anything in good faith seeing as in the og comment section, he'd call artists "wannabes" and proceed to brag about his prompting skills and how much money he makes, then went back and forth with me and just insulted me... kind of just speaks for itself, i can post the other screenshots in the comments if more context is required but idek dawg, also i'm not a dude

Username censored for sub rule compliance. She blocked me for asking her if she stood by this post.

….mhm. Yes. And they aren’t? I don’t need ai. God.

Another one's mask fell off. Yeah, it is also legal to goon to cartoon characters who are underaged, but grown people doing so are gross as hell.

Also spreading misinformation, as if Grok wasn't trained on CSAM, which was confirmed.

And also defending even generating that shit, no matter how it's done is just... Gross.

This isn't the first time I've seen this behavior. I'll say this much as an individual:

It is okay to go this far with people who defend shit like this. I bet this person also justifies getting their rocks off to depictions of underaged children, because they are actually "10,000 year old dragons, with the depiction and mannerisms of a 6 year old."

Legal, but I catch anyone I personally know doing that, I'll spread it far and wide, make sure people know what kind of person they are hanging out with.

This behavior is so fucking gross and morally bankrupt.

I have dysgraphia but even then I don’t think this is nice to say to people. Like…if anybody told me this at all I’d be upset. But seriously. I hate this. It crushes my spirit even if it’s somebody who I shouldn’t care about. Also the LISP thing ain’t even true???? Sorry if the flair is wrong somebody tell me if there’s a different one for here

This gives the "Well if electricity went out, I'd watch TV in candlelight" -kind of vibes.