r/sportsgossips 1d ago

News Sean Strickland been on TikTok too much. Wants de*th penalty for both Lindsay and Patrick Clansy. Lindsay is on trial for strangling and ending the lives of their three children.

Post image
118 Upvotes

252 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Welcome to r/Sportsgossips! Please ensure your post follows our community rules:

  1. Be Respectful To Community Members: No cursing or criticism when Gossip is on!
  2. No Spamming: Don't try to clog the feed, everyone is free to share the stories.
  3. No Excessive Self-Promotions Allowed
  4. Repost & Duplicates: Check recent post before submitting. Duplicate or excessive reposts may be removed.
  5. Stay Relevant to the Subreddit: Posts must relate to athletes, teams, leagues, trades, rumors, relationships, legal issues, or sports media drama. Non-sports celebrity gossip will be removed.
  6. Use Proper Titles & Flairs: Use clear, descriptive titles and apply the correct flair.
  7. No Fake News or Fabricated Stories: Rumours are allowed, but completely made up stories are not. Clearly label posts as 'Rumours' when necessary.
  8. No Low-Effort Content: To maintain high-quality discussions and keep the feed engaging, all submissions must meet a basic standard of effort.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

19

u/Krytan 1d ago

Weren't the 'drugs' she was on her prescribed medications, prescribed by actual doctors and medical health professionals, to deal with the PPD she was experiencing?

And he didn't just leave the house on a whim - he left, after she asked him to, in order to bring back food for the family and her medications.

It sounds like Sean is suggesting the death penalty for any man who doesn't immediately have his wife irrevocably committed to a mental health institution the first instant she experiences PPD. I don't think that sets up a particularly good set of incentives for anyone.

Wasn't she described as an 'incredible mother' by her friends and family?

5

u/conartist19 23h ago

I believe its that the meds she was on were prescribed by people who didnt know her full medical history/what had been prescribed to her in the past so she was basically given a cocktail of meds.

Presumably she was in a better place when he left because theres no way he would be leaving her alone if she was actively having an episode

To me its more that hes suggesting that the husband knew the risk and ignored it just to get out of the situation. However from what Ive seen reported anyone whose heard his 911 call would not believe he didnt care about the kids

Does it really matter? people can only report what they perceive and what they think the nice thing to say is. Plus the perception of a 3rd party is almost completely irrelevant to determine the quality of a parent, the children are typically the ones who get to determine that and we know she was one of the worst mothers of all time since she killed all of her kids. You cant be an incredible mother and then strangle all your kids

5

u/Entire-Cry-8930 22h ago

How is the husband supposed to know if the prescribed meds were appropriate? We have experts for a reason.

2

u/conartist19 22h ago

No one said he was, I was pointing out that the people prescribing her meds didnt know her full history when doing so.

2

u/thick_neck_etc 3h ago

she lied to doctors to get what she wants

2

u/Open-Beautiful9247 8h ago

I mean, friends and family can say what they want. An incredible mother doesnt kill her kids.

And yeah if you have reason to believe your wife is ha ing thoughts like that you absolutely should have her committed.....

Not really seeing the controversy here.

1

u/Mediocre_Nap 7h ago

he is also described as going on multiple trips without her and the kids …

7

u/Defiant_Group5176 23h ago

Honestly Strickland is much more refreshing than any other person in the Man o sphere. Rough around the edge. Yup. Says something’s I don’t agree with. But honestly somebody that in the ufc that isn’t brown nosing trump gets my respect

1

u/LVRaiders2026 18h ago

Im solidly left wing democrat but i like listening to strickland too.  At the end of the day hes authentic. Hes not grifting, he doesnt care for followers, hes not intentionally being edgy for views, hes just being is normal outspoken dumbass self and i like it. 

-1

u/gymtrovert1988 15h ago

He's absolutely doing all of this for attention and likes and views.

Nobody knew who he was until he adopted this persona. Same as Colby with slightly less MAGA.

23

u/RelativeCan5021 1d ago

As a man/father it is very intimidating and difficult to intervene and push the mother out. The Justice system seems to be heavily in favor of the woman. It’s hard to accuse a woman of abusing her children without looking like a gaslighter/ narcissistic abuser.

5

u/EpilepticDawg241 23h ago

The mother openly stated she has had multiple thoughts of killing the children and shared that with her husband/ family.

I would NOT leave her alone with kids after that statement. Prescribed medication or not. Even if she was labeled "Mother of the Centry" by her close friends.

She had a nanny!

Imagine is she was Hispanic or black....

3

u/TrumpsBussy_ 21h ago

If that’s true that she expressed thoughts of killing her children on multiple occasions then she should even have supervised time with her children. She’s either a risk to her children’s lives or she isn’t.

2

u/EpilepticDawg241 20h ago

A month before the killings, Musgrove said, her daughter came to her and Clancy's then-husband, Patrick Clancy.

"She told us she had thoughts of harming the children," Musgrove said.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62emm4yp8go

3

u/TrumpsBussy_ 20h ago

So she should have been removed from the children entirely then…

3

u/EpilepticDawg241 20h ago

Thats what im sayin...

As a father myself I cannot understand why they let that continue.

1

u/Agency-Asleep 4h ago

I once had an experience with a close family member with a history of mental illness that said she was having thoughts of harming her newborn child. When I went to her home the police were called because I said I wasn’t comfortable leaving her alone with the child in the state. When the police arrived they told me if I didn’t leave they would have me for trespassing and that the thoughts the mother was verbalizing were “normal.”

Being the husband is different for sure but I don’t know how much more he could have done in the situation

7

u/Several_Direction599 1d ago

Not in her case. Friend of mine had a baby mother who also dealt with post partum psychosis and he got custody quickly

9

u/throwaway3413418 1d ago

He wasn’t dealing with a wife with PPP, because nobody diagnosed her or claimed that she had it prior to her killing the kids and the defense using it as their argument for an insanity defense.

4

u/conartist19 21h ago

the PPP defense is insane to me because the youngest child was 8 months old, thats too long to seriously believe post partum was still the driving factor, if it was even a factor at all

4

u/throwaway3413418 21h ago

Yeah, it’s strange to me that people are claiming PPP when psychosis not associated with giving birth seems like a lower bar to pass in proving the claim. I think it’s due to the moral associations they’re all making. The political utility of associating this case with postpartum care and alleged women’s issues is very alluring whether or not the evidence actually fits that.

5

u/conartist19 21h ago

I think its all the cocktail of meds she was on but I dont think the crowd defending her wants to have an honest conversation about how meds fuck up peoples brains and often make their situations worse.

It just seems like her case is a combo of many underlying issues and people are projecting them onto someone that doesnt really deserve it. As far as Im concerned the only question should be was she mentally there when doing it and that question should only matter if she is put in prison for life or given the death penalty. I dont think it should even be a question that shes removed from society forever

4

u/BilgisticPile 15h ago

Former psychiatric nurse here. This isn’t how postpartum psychosis works.

5

u/refusetobeold83 23h ago

She was never diagnosed as being psychotic. Despite her extensive treatment by multiple specialists. Because she wasn’t psychotic. She was depressed and suicidal.

1

u/sticksforkicks 21h ago

Grow a set, man.

1

u/Secure_Inspection305 9h ago

No excuse to not at least try to do something

0

u/who_dis62 1d ago

Obviously not as simple as Sean makes it seem. I don’t have any info on the Dad’s behavior prior, but it’s not like he can be at her side every minute of every day and provide for the family. Also, been a lot of cases where the spouse leaves the relationship and other spouse murders the kids. Mental health is no joke and this is a sad situation all the way around.

Is there a specific time period that is acceptable for the father to move on after he loses his whole family? I mean I’m no grief counselor but I can assume that its either try and move on or take to the bottle.

0

u/BilgisticPile 15h ago

This isn’t actually true, if you bother to look at any statistics. It’s just something men say online, while maybe throwing in some anecdotal stories.

Men who actually seek custody, get it most of the time. Men are also more likely to gain custody after accusing the mom of abuse, whereas the opposite is true for women.

It’s 2026 and men are still peddling these lies.

2

u/Interesting_Fix4519 13h ago

Uhhh. No.

Mothers still win 70-80% of all custody cases.

0

u/Secure_Inspection305 9h ago

Barely any of those cases are fought over in court.

4

u/ShockinglyEfficient 21h ago

Why do we care what Sean Strickland wants or talks about?

4

u/Ok_Entrepreneur826 1d ago

I think the Nazi just wants to kill people.

3

u/Meester_Blue 23h ago

We should let him kill her at least. Seems you hate him more than you hate that b, which is a wild moral compass

1

u/Defiant_Group5176 22h ago

lol what makes Strickland a nazi?? Honestly he’s pretty refreshing as far as guys in the man o sphere go. The worst thing I’ve seen him say are some homophobic slurs…. don’t love that but that doesn’t = nazi.

Also I’m pretty left leaning and love calling trump and his cronies nazis so I am not one of those people that has been calling for everyone to start calling them nazis.

-2

u/Ok_Entrepreneur826 22h ago

Geeze bro all that typing and not a lick of research into what you talking about

2

u/HollyMurray20 20h ago

“Held”, and “he renounced those views as an adult” would both suggest that he is in fact, not a Nazi…

1

u/Defiant_Group5176 8h ago

lol I did that research and even took it a step further but you should have cut out the last two lines if you really wanted to prove your point…

You can’t pick your family and I will not shame any child that latches on to shitty ideologies as a child. More respect for being taught that by family and then realizing it was bs….

-1

u/Intrepid_Side6023 1d ago

It would make the world a better place

3

u/Pristine_Dare_2510 1d ago

Sean’s right this lady is guilty of first degree murder. The husband is a POS who is guilty of negligence. The number of women lined up to support this child killer is no shock tho. It’s funny how 100 years ago yall got the right to vote and the biggest issue politically that you aligned with is your apartment right to kill your unborn children. So it’s no surprise the easily manipulated female vote would show up to support a baby killer.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/North-Translator6286 23h ago

not a terrible take at all. actual good take

2

u/mediocre-misfit 13h ago

he is 100% correct

2

u/Hawkeye9797 9h ago

Dudes take is valid

1

u/uncommon_type 7h ago

I mean he’s not wrong

-3

u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 1d ago

This whole trial is about which color jumper she wears for the rest of her life. Just more distraction from Epstein, a failing economy, and losing yet another boondoggle war in the middle east

3

u/3rdtryatremembering 23h ago

Yea, no one cared about murder trials before that stuff /s

5

u/Fresh_Ostrich4034 23h ago

how tf did we get to red v blue out of this lol. 24/7. People really think nothing can happen outside their politics.

2

u/Jolly_Mouse_7604 21h ago

It's a distraction from the politics, the whole point is look away from the politics, at this

→ More replies (6)

0

u/Embarrassed-Yak-5902 22h ago

She's either wearing an orange jumper or a white jumper (prison or mental facility)

Not to do with politics.

7

u/brooklynsantiago 1d ago

Not true at all. She will only remain institutionalized until she is deemed no longer a threat to the public, which given her unique claim of post partum psychosis (and the fact she was only ever a threat to her kids who are dead) could mean she’s released as soon as 40 days from verdict

7

u/_Azamat_Bagatov 1d ago

That will never happen. Andrea Yates was found not guilty and she’s still in the looney bin 25 years later

5

u/brooklynsantiago 23h ago

Andrea Yates has not seeked release from psychiatric care. She thinks she belongs there. Also Massachusetts is very different than Texas. It has one of the most generous set of laws regarding mental capacity defenses

6

u/Ordinary_Musician_76 1d ago

This is the correct answer.

How people don’t know this is shocking.

1

u/brooklynsantiago 1d ago

I just saw your other comment saying the same thing and it’s downvoted. Gotta love reddit lmao

1

u/Ordinary_Musician_76 1d ago

Reddit gonna Reddit lol

2

u/Appropriate_Owl_91 23h ago

This is bullshit. The very small people granted insanity serve at least double what the normal prison sentence would be.

0

u/brooklynsantiago 23h ago

Generally yes. Not in Clancy’s case she will not

0

u/Appropriate_Owl_91 23h ago

Says who? After she’s sentenced people will forget in a few weeks. The midterms are coming and our attention doesn’t last that long.

2

u/brooklynsantiago 23h ago

Why would it have anything to do with attention

0

u/Appropriate_Owl_91 23h ago

Why would it differ from precedence? She’s not the first to do this.

1

u/brooklynsantiago 23h ago

Because that’s how it works in Massachusetts

→ More replies (2)

1

u/ChunkyBubblz 22h ago

Idiotic statement

0

u/hydroknightking 1d ago

She’s literally arguing temporary insanity because of the drugs. She’s no longer on the drugs. Therefore, if found temporary insanity is accepted, she’ll be out real fast

-2

u/--Racer-X-- 1d ago

Oh yeah? So they made up charges for this random woman just so you forget about Epstein Huh? Tell me about that.

0

u/DeadMeeT6969 1d ago

The only more unalive than Lindsay's children is your media literacy.

-3

u/Emergency-Back-4964 1d ago

Man stfu 😂

“B-b-but… Media literacy!! 🤓”

-6

u/--Racer-X-- 1d ago

Dunning Kruger

0

u/Llhaniii 1d ago

Don't be a smart ass you know its just depending whether she is incarcerated in a mental asylum or a prison for life and its getting super coverage while a slew of other issues go on without any real attention.

-5

u/Ordinary_Musician_76 1d ago edited 1d ago

That’s not how not guilty by insanity works …like at all.

-3

u/KingOfWhateverr 1d ago

It is in a nutshell. They have to prove she had the capacity to understand right and wrong to put her in prison; based on the prep and sending the husband out and asking for a lawyer, she has that capacity

-2

u/Ordinary_Musician_76 1d ago

They are sentenced untill deemed no longer mentally ill and no longer pose a danger to themselves or society.

It is not a life sentence.

Killers have been granted release from not guilty by way of insanity once the criteria is met.

The amount of people spewing “it’s the color the jumpsuit” is disturbing - so many misinformed people.

1

u/KingOfWhateverr 1d ago

I mean you’re phrasing it disingenuously. They have to go in front of the court and be approved in addition to a supporting psych eval.

And all of this is under the presupposition that she will be found NGRI; she won’t based on her actions to hide the murder. It proves she was in enough of a state of mind to understand her actions and consequences.

0

u/Ordinary_Musician_76 1d ago

You said “it is in a nutshell” in response to the trial being what color her jumper is for the rest of her life.

Thankfully you now understand that is not true.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

He has a point.

3

u/Obvious_Hyena_6716 1d ago

The point is being morally objectionable without breaking the law deserves a death penalty?

-2

u/Key_Fee158 23h ago

No, I mean his point about judging the father as a failure to his kids.

3

u/JessieGemstone999 1d ago

Except no he fucking doesn't

1

u/vincedarling 21h ago

Ok I read this as Swerve Strickland and I was confused

1

u/rainydays_89 8h ago

Sean Strickland has brain damage

1

u/Lemfan46 8h ago

Derth penalty? Stop censoring shit.

1

u/acreboy1966 6h ago

I agree they're both guilty

1

u/OkRespond4682 5h ago

I mean it would settle it

1

u/Late-Ad918 5h ago

He ain’t wrong

1

u/ChutneyWhatney 4h ago

Only for the mother as she is a mass murderer.

1

u/Once-A-Republic 4h ago

Guess we can put all Republican voters on the block for the USAID genocide

-1

u/Apprehensive-Size150 1d ago

Strickland is not very smart lol

My understanding (I could be mistaken) is she was getting treatment for her mental health issues. She was had inpatient care, was prescribed multiple medications and continued with outpatient care. She denied having the urge to hurt herself or others.

So she denied having homicidal thoughts and she was getting treatment. WTF is the father supposed to do? Leave and try to take the children with him? Family courts consistently favor the mother and she was in active treatment with no homicidal ideations, so there's a ZERO percent change a judge would deny her custody, even if it's partial custody. How do you think the separation and custody battle would affect her mental health?

0

u/bex199 1d ago

where did you get that information from?

3

u/Apprehensive-Size150 1d ago

The case? She saw multiple psychiatric providers and she was admitted the hospital at the beginning of January and stayed for multiple days. She left feeling better and her mood seemed better. near the end of January She asked her husband to get takeout, so he left the house, picked up medication and food (took less than an hour) came back home and the kids were dead.

2

u/bex199 22h ago

you’re leaving out important details. she was also discharged early and denied care when she sought help. she told family members about thoughts of harming the children. poor coordination among her medical team was documented as well. this is all in evidence.

0

u/Okeydokey2u 22h ago

Thank you everyone is pointing their fingers on every direction except our mental health care system

1

u/Sudden_Place_1173 1d ago

She deserves the rope for sure

1

u/PaleKid4L 23h ago

Nah, I’m with Sean here.

Multiple things can be true at once. Yes, she is horrible for murdering her kids. Yes, her husband knew she was struggling heavily and should have intervened more by, for example, not leaving her alone with them.

Postpartum psychosis is real, and absolutely horrifying.

1

u/Prize_Sector5854 22h ago

CTE is a horrible thing

1

u/Electrical-Data-5251 22h ago

I’m thinking Sean’s taken a few too many kicks to the head

1

u/NoMeat9096 21h ago

How many blows to the head has this genius taken?

-2

u/Meester_Blue 1d ago

Not a horrendous take imo. He did mess up bad

9

u/Santa5511 23h ago

Dude what? How? The doctors never told him not to leave her at home alone with the kids. He was running an errand that SHE asked him to run. How is her strangling her three kids his fault at all?

7

u/Fresh_Ostrich4034 23h ago

cause they want to blame anyone except the woman that murdered her children

3

u/LinusLevato 23h ago

Exactly. How many times does a bitch have to cry wolf before it’s okay to start thinking she’s not serious?

-1

u/Pigeons_and_Whiskey 21h ago

He was regularly leaving his children alone with a psychotic woman with violent intrusive thoughts so he could run around with other women.

4

u/Salty-Spring7096 23h ago

So we blame the husband for not somehow intuiting that his wife had murderous intent?

-1

u/Meester_Blue 23h ago

Yes lol. That’s a pretty low bar

3

u/Salty-Spring7096 23h ago

Big brain moment

3

u/InevitableProgram267 23h ago

This is the absolute worst take. She lied to him and was pretending to have one of her best days to get him to leave. For 40 minutes.

If someone isn’t able to leave their spouse alone for 40 minutes without risk of their entire family being killed, the spouse has absolutely no reason living in public society to begin with.

-1

u/Meester_Blue 23h ago

That’s kinda the point, he shoulda had her dealt with way earlier

0

u/Fresh_Ostrich4034 23h ago edited 23h ago

yeah he married that psycho bitch

downvote me if you want. she murdered her children

3

u/Meester_Blue 23h ago

Exactly. We should at least be able to admit that he’s a total idiot

1

u/Fresh_Ostrich4034 22h ago

only for putting a ring on a murderer. its going to be hot where she goes

-4

u/Nezzar555 1d ago

There really is a two tier system. I've been banned from Elon Musk's website for stuff way less than promoting violence like this but these MAGA guys get away with it openly

1

u/TWOPlNTSPRICK 1d ago

Calling for the death penalty in a case where three children have been murdered isn’t ’advocating violence’ you sap

4

u/marlonbrando_1999 1d ago

Calling for the murder of someone who has nothing to do with it? Yeah, that’s advocating violence

→ More replies (16)

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/saltypeanut15 1d ago

Yah… and?

5

u/Commercial_Toe_7137 1d ago

... And you don't see how that's insane?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/godplaysdice_ 1d ago

Did you miss the part where he called for the husband to be hanged?

-1

u/Nezzar555 1d ago

Doesn't matter what the person did. That language on x isnt allowed for anything but Elon's favorite nazis

0

u/bex199 1d ago

you’re leaving out important details. she was also discharged early and denied care when she sought help. she told family members about thoughts of harming the children. poor coordination among her medical team was documented as well. this is all in evidence.

-1

u/refusetobeold83 23h ago

She seems fine now, no? Guess that prison doctor is a guru.

Reality: she was depressed and suicidal. Not psychotic.

→ More replies (2)

-2

u/Intrepid_Side6023 1d ago

Strickland is right

-6

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

wtf is the dad supposed to do? I feel terrible for the guy.

4

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

Not leave his children alone in the custody of someone who is at risk of harming them?

2

u/Krytan 1d ago

So...divorce his wife and deny her custody?

2

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

You don’t need a divorce to leave the kids with their grandparents temporarily

1

u/Krytan 1d ago

If the wife shows up at the grandparents and says 'I'm taking my kids' they cannot stop her. You would have to immediately completely remove all custody rights from the mother.

Is that what we are suggesting for all mothers suffering from PPD (which is already a painful thing to endure, and already stigmatized?)

1

u/Key_Fee158 23h ago

But that didn’t happen cause the dad didn’t even try…

1

u/Krytan 23h ago

Define 'didn't even try'.
Didn't he get his wife professional help? Didn't he ensure she got medications (he was getting medicine for her when she murdered the kids). Didn't he hire a nanny?

That all sounds like trying to me.

Or are you asserting the husband bears full accountability for the wife's actions, and that if the wife succeeds in murdering the children that is ipso facto proof the husband didn't try hard enough?

1

u/Key_Fee158 23h ago

Again, taking the kids to stay with their grandkids is not the insane proposition you make it out to be.

And, no. The wife having all of the responsibility in a legal or philosophical sense doesn’t bring the kids back. Being a little proactive and more concerned would’ve kept them alive, so yeah I think he’s a weak man who didn’t protect his kids.

3

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

She’s their mother. She’s seen doctors. Doctors didn’t intervene. Why would he think their mom would kill them? No one would think that. Hindsight is always 20/20

-2

u/yupuhoh 1d ago

Hindsight is always 20/20

Pretty sure she told him she wanted to kill them. Or at least had thoughts of it.

3

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

Why? Cause u saw a tik tok vid? Stop it. The guy lost his children. Why punish him more

-4

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

Because she said she wanted to harm them…? I can’t tell if you people are intentionally being retarded.

Maybe show more proactiveness and urgency at the situation and leave the kids with someone else like their grandparents

2

u/LionBig1760 22h ago

She declared her intentions ahead of time...

Premeditated murder it is, then.

→ More replies (2)

-1

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

Maybe come down from your throne and stop judging people based of what u read on the internet. You have no idea what the situation was

-1

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

The situation is that she said she had was having ideations about harming them and he left her alone with them.

It doesn’t take much common sense to know that’s a bad idea.

1

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

U have no idea what the situation was. There’s three sides to every story. His, hers, and the truth. You’re not privy to all three. Stop

2

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

The only fact that matters here is that she told him she was having ideations of harming the kids. That’s established.

If he knows that, he should have been more proactive about protecting the kids. It’s a lame excuse to say anything else. Not leaving them alone with her is such a low low bar.

As a parent he had a duty to protect the kids and not leave them in a situation that endangered their lives.

1

u/Winter_Tone_4343 1d ago

How’s that a fact? Cause the murdered said so? The person trying not to get the death penalty or die in prison? We’re taking their word for it? I’m not.

0

u/MakaveliX1996 1d ago

Right, the word of the mental patient.

1

u/Several_Direction599 1d ago

But that doesn’t align with the patriarchy /s

2

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

Brother idk if you’re trying to be retarded both although she’s obviously guilty that doesn’t bring the kids back.

She said she would harm them. Be a good parent and don’t leave the kids with their mom who is going through psychosis.

0

u/Several_Direction599 1d ago

I think you’re the one lacking reading comprehension. Or do you not understand what a “/s” means?

I’m agreeing with you, dolt

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Key_Fee158 1d ago

Or…leave them with their grandparents. Pretty easy solution if he was proactive and took the situation seriously.

1

u/--Racer-X-- 1d ago

Maybe take steps to get them away for their crazy mother....or just sut there and watch it happen. But hey Dads got a new GF and no burdens so good for him right?

2

u/Commercial_Toe_7137 1d ago

Stop pretending like the courts wouldn't have given her full custody. She was trying to get away from her, likely because she was insane.

She murdered her children in cold blood. Trying to pass this off as somehow anyone's fault but her or her brain is really illuminating about yourself and your feelings.

1

u/--Racer-X-- 1d ago

I have children. It's my job to protect them from threats, even their mother if it came to that. If you don't care about your kids that's fine but I care about mine.

0

u/M0ebius_1 1d ago

Never leave the house with the kids alone in the house with her...

That doesn't seem unreasonable.

0

u/WorryNot_634 1d ago

Both public display for all to see

0

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 1d ago

Strictland probably wants to fk the husband

0

u/Amoral_matchstick 1d ago

"Man who gets brain trauma for a living has bad take, news at 11"

→ More replies (4)

0

u/Figueroa_Chill 23h ago

The husband just has something weird and creepy about him.

2

u/LionBig1760 22h ago

The wife just murdered 3 children.

→ More replies (16)

-2

u/Round-Equivalent-513 23h ago

I mean honestly, the safest thing to do is not date liberal women. Look how they’re reacting to this

1

u/Appropriate_Owl_91 23h ago

Liberal women would agree to your take.

1

u/refusetobeold83 23h ago

I highly doubt that woman was liberal. Maybe her supporters are. But Nancy? I doubt it

0

u/idster 23h ago

Why do you think it’s mostly liberals?

-2

u/ryanjm37 1d ago

Death penalty for her. Life in prison for him.

0

u/looking4funsd7 1d ago

Absolutely

0

u/Fat_Commie 23h ago

who the fuck is sean strickland??

0

u/Few-Echidna-2181 23h ago

Probably the most important person on television right now as far as good perspectives

0

u/Few-Echidna-2181 23h ago

“Get in line for the rope” is top tier comedy

0

u/DrippyTan 21h ago

Damn. He sounds like all my female coworkers.

0

u/Frequent-Mastodon132 17h ago

And he’s right about the piece of shit father.

0

u/OperationBig2738 11h ago

Never listen to anybody who gets punched in the head for a living

-1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TWOPlNTSPRICK 1d ago

Yeah gonna go out on a limb here chief and say a dodgy tweet isn’t as bad as murdering three children

-1

u/Long-Painting-9852 22h ago

I’m also the type of guy that could be intimate and remarry after <1 year….. does that mean I love my kids any less? No.

Sean is such a troll. Just saying shit to keep in the headlines.