r/walkaway Redpilled 16h ago

Not that difficult

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 16h ago

IMPORTANT: On /r/WalkAway, greater access is given to users who have joined the sub and have the mod-assigned 'Redpilled' user flair. Reach out in modmail to request the flair if you're an active, rule-abiding contributor on the sub.

For more in-depth conversations and resources on leaving the Democrat Party, also make sure to join our sister sub /r/ExDemocrats. You may also like:

Leave the Left Subs: /r/WalkAway, /r/ExDemocrats, /r/LibsOfReddit
Leftist Persona Subs: /r/HillaryForPrison, /r/FauciForPrison, /r/EnoughAntifaSpam
Conservative Persona Subs: /r/RedpilledRogan, /r/RedpilledElon
Conservative News Subs: /r/Conservative_News, /r/Patriot911
Civics Sub: /r/FreePress

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

299

u/Cranks_No_Start ULTRA Redpilled 14h ago

From my understanding 2 of the women are wearing pink is support of her and the nutcases outside....they need to be removed from the jury and bring in the alternates.

81

u/ZaLeqaJ Redpilled 10h ago

They are obv. biased, so its crazy they were allowed to be in the Jury...

14

u/TheBigMotherFook 6h ago

Is that true? If it is, that would be pretty solid grounds for a mistrial.

10

u/Fit_Professional1916 5h ago

It is true but the judge said there is no reason to assume they are wearing pink to support her, because it could be a coincidence so they will continue.

13

u/prosthetic_memory 10h ago

Eyewitnesses say no one was wearing pink.

8

u/Cranks_No_Start ULTRA Redpilled 7h ago

I've seen multiple posts saying otherwise.

129

u/Ghost_Turd 13h ago

This has gone on too long already. Th ones who are holding out for her are not going to change their minds. This will be a mistrial.

161

u/kimana1651 Redpilled 15h ago

The court is fairly clear in instances like this. They are there to judge the person in regards to the law, not what they feel or think about the laws.

70

u/WskyRcks ULTRA Redpilled 15h ago

Hopefully.

Hopefully.

86

u/Seraphayel Redpilled 13h ago

Unfortunately that’s not how juries work in times like these where tribalism is above all.

26

u/Sme11Gibson Redpilled 13h ago

Any one of them that thinks she shouldn’t be charged should have to watch a realistic AI recreation of the event and then given a second chance to make a decision.

67

u/Career_Cultivator Redpilled 13h ago

Females are majorly emotionally driven. Doesn't matter how many times you tell them, as long as they feel like they're doing the right thing.

-2

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

42

u/Arvid38 Redpilled 9h ago

If this chick somehow totally gets off and doesn’t serve prison time, it’s a step in the wrong direction for post birth abortion. Those poor three kids 😭.

32

u/letsmakemoneys Redpilled 13h ago

Hold the friggin' line!!!

40

u/ohhhbooyy 11h ago

Why is it that the only thing women are fighting for is pretty much the right to kill a child without consequence?

Life must be good if that’s all you got to fight for.

22

u/kimptown 10h ago

Hold the line boys! We're counting on you.

7

u/Fearless-Cupcake828 9h ago edited 9h ago

Hahaha I love it!! Just being honest… As soon as I read it was 9 women I thought this probably isn’t going to end well.

6

u/Next_Engineer_8230 Redpilled 9h ago

Pookie on TikTok said it best.

He nailed the entire thing.

I don't have TikTok or follow him but my fiance showed me the video today and I couldn't help but clap. It was spot on.

I can't link it here but if you can find it, it's facts.

Pookietheplumber

-1

u/prosthetic_memory 10h ago

The jury is not talking about whether or not she murdered her kids, btw. She’s pleading insanity, not innocence.

14

u/KitSwiftpaw 5h ago

The fact she sent her husband out of the house first proves she knew it was wrong and did it when nobody could stop her.

-65

u/lovejo1 Redpilled 13h ago

Intent.. and the ability to have intent is the key in this case. Lawyers make their own definitions of words. Don't be surprised when she's not found guilty of murder 1.. according to jury instruction and testimony I saw (not on the news, the whole trial).. I don't think she'll be found guilty.. and if I were a jury, I don't think I could say she met the requirements in that state either...

39

u/rudelyinterrupts 11h ago

She planned out how long her husband would be away. That implies intent.

3

u/shesogooey 5h ago

And who searched for “where is the carotid artery” and “how to disable Kia airbags”? Apparently not her. That also shows intent.

-10

u/lovejo1 Redpilled 6h ago

Not at all. She called CVS before sending him to make sure the medicine was in stock. Then he called and said he couldn't find name brand and she said generic was fine... Implies she was not stalling.

5

u/rudelyinterrupts 1h ago

She made sure her husband was out of the house before she strangled her three kids. That is intent. She killed her three kids after planning it out.

2

u/Dapper-Print9016 29m ago

She looked up how long it would take him to do several tasks using google*

Make sure you actually paid attention to the evidence before you lie about it.

-63

u/Tryongirl 12h ago

Maybe you people should have watched the trial

31

u/pm_me_ur_anything_k EXTRA Redpilled 10h ago

Maybe she shouldn’t have killed her kids

15

u/Fearless-Cupcake828 9h ago

I’m pretty sure we did.. what were YOU watching!? Clearly it wasn’t the same

3

u/mexicanred1 11h ago

Is she saying that the husband did it?

-9

u/yankeephil86 10h ago

I was hoping that since the defense added 2nd degree and manslaughter that they would be able to agree to a lesser charge instead of 1st degree