This experience actually reshaped my entire view on California real estate.
In short, city cited me a code violation citatio after a 5 minutes google search , and recorded the Notice of violation to my property title the next day, without giving me a chance to even receive the citation.
Citation was because photos on gooogle don’t meet city current code. Without an in person tour, code enforcement issued the citation #1, clouded my title and ruined an active house escrow.
Citation #2 and #3 were issued and all my appeal hearing requests in writing and apppeal hearing fee is cashed, but no hearing was granted.
I lost 10 lbs within a week after I heard from the attorneys that 1. city’s code enforcement notices are essentially a lien on your title 2. to fight against this, you need a 3 year court process, during those 3 years, you can’t refinance, sell or change title to your property.
A 3 year court fight is essentially a $100k attorney fee fight and city has exemptions to reimburse attorney fees so you could win the case, but lose substantially in attorney fees.
So, I was told the best bet is to negotiate with the city and get a settlement.
I figured, due to my proofs in my hands, I shall be able to prove myself. I filed a small claim court case and asked for an injunction relief. As soon as I filed a case against the city, code enforcement immediately called me and said they would refund #2 #3 but not #1 and not refund all the processing fees charged by the center.
i went to court, provided all proofs ( cameras, home usages, witnesses for lease listings ) and city could not provide any proof. Judge ruled in my favor.
I thought this is the final decision. No, I kept receiving collections letter from the city stating I owe them clawback fees due to judge issued order against the city to pay me.
So, the current status is, city still keeps harassing me with collection fees for a violation that I never did and proved to be false allegations by court. I’m facing a $100 citation collection after fighting so hard, and am still owed for thousands of suit costs by the city.
This is probably why you can’t own property in smaller cities and cities in hardship, no matter how good the numbers look like.
TBH, this property has appreciated well, but I was on the edge of getting seized by the city because of google search..
In bigger metros, this problem is less of a problem because they have better understanding of civil rights.
In CAalifornia, you need to ask around and figure out if a city is truly buyable.