• Budget: ₹1.0–1.4 lakh
• Country: India
• Condition: New
• Type of Camera: APS-C mirrorless
• Intended use: Photography for personal enjoyment, travel, learning photography, and possibly creating content for Instagram in the future. Not professional/commercial work.
• If photography, what style: Travel, landscapes, street, portraits, everyday photography, and general photography. I mainly want something significantly more capable than my phone.
• If video what style: Cinematic/travel videos and possibly cinematography for my own Instagram. Nothing professional for now.
• What features do you absolutely need:
Good autofocus, good image quality, good JPEGs/colour, decent video capabilities, reliable long-term support, good battery life, and a body that I can comfortably keep for 5–10 years.
• Portability: Important. I want something I’ll actually carry around while travelling rather than a camera that stays at home.
• Cameras you're considering:
Nikon Z50II — ₹1.04L with dual-lens kit
Sony A6700 — ₹1.40L with 16–50mm + 55–210mm
Fujifilm X-S20 — originally my dream camera
Canon R10
Canon R50
• Cameras you already have: Phone only
• Notes:
I think I may have Gear Acquisition Syndrome at this point. 😂
I've been researching cameras for a long time and keep comparing specs, sensors, autofocus, batteries, codecs, firmware support, etc. I originally loved the X-S20, but eventually ruled it out because of concerns about autofocus, heating, controls, and its future/discontinuation rumours.
The R50 was ruled out mainly because of heating concerns, while the R10 didn't feel right ergonomically and I'm not particularly attracted to Canon's current APS-C ecosystem.
That leaves me with the Z50II vs A6700.
The Z50II is ₹36K cheaper and already seems more than capable for what I actually need. But the A6700 has IBIS, better battery life, higher resolution, stronger video capabilities and better autofocus, which makes me wonder if it's worth paying extra for something I intend to keep for 5–10 years.
My biggest question isn't really "which camera is better?" — obviously the A6700 is more capable.
It's:
Do I actually need to spend ₹1.4L, or am I just suffering from Gear Acquisition Syndrome?
I don't want to cheap out now and regret it later, but I also don't want to spend ₹36K extra simply because the more expensive camera has more features I'll probably never use.
Would love to hear what you would choose in my situation.