r/Epilepsy • u/Impossible-Camel-157 • 23h ago
Discussion Do we just ditch the e-word?
I am a speaker (with epilepsy) and I find myself at a lot of medical conventions and advocacy events. I was having a discussion with someone who said something that struck me.
‘What if we just ditch the e-word?’ ‘What if we just call it a seizure disorder’. ‘The word conjures fear before we get a chance to explain.’
Would it help? Would ‘seizure disorder’ give us a fresh start?
I’ve dedicated my adult life to advocacy. I’m in the camp that for many it’s the stigma, not just the seizures, that are keeping us down.
To be very clear - I’m not advocating one way or another. But it makes for an interesting discussion.
And this isn’t about identifier words. (Epileptic/person with epilepsy/etc), it’s all personal preference and whatever feels right is your business alone. To me, this is a different question.
I thought it was interesting when she said that bipolar disorder used to be called manic depressive disorder. And the switch, at least in part, hoped to overcome a fearful image.
Most of advocacy is trying to reset what epilepsy means to the public.
I have no shame around my condition. I was lucky to be taught not to hide it. And yet I do wonder. How much of the weight is just wrapped up in the word?
Your thoughts !
Edit - Lots of responses! Some context -
- Absolutely not endorsing this or claiming it as my opinion, as I said above. I was approached, by a physician, with this perspective, and thought it would be an interesting discussion. Sometimes there is a divide in discourse between two worlds because patient groups are often not in the room to respond with their perspective. That’s why it matters!
- Some comments here that I am encouraging hiding or shame around the language we use. Wild take. My whole world is about encouraging people to speak up. That’s why this perspective was interesting to me. Does the language have that much power or does focusing on language totally miss the point? That’s the discussion.
I kept my perspective out so as not to color this. I am in the camp that the words are not the source of the problem. Now we have a thread that this physician could be shown with a nuanced response. Overwhelmingly, the epilepsy community here would disagree with them. That’s productive.
There is a medical distinction for a reason, that’s correct. Interesting that this perspective was from a physician, at a conference, which was called out here in the comments.