Okay, this has turned into a MUCH bigger rabbit hole than I intended, so apologies in advance. This probably means absolutely nothing, but I’ve spent far too long on it now 😂
It started with someone pointing out that Cinder’s sword is repeatedly described using language of cold, winter and quiet.
And that got me thinking.
What if the Chandrian’s signs aren’t passive things that just happen everywhere they go?
What if the signs are produced when they use their swords?
Bear with me…
We know the Chandrian can hide their signs somehow. The Cthaeh tells Kvothe they have a lot of experience hiding those telltale signs.
Cinder manages to spend time as the bandit leader in the Eld without everyone around him freezing to death or realising they’re apparently working for one of the Chandrian.
But when Kvothe meets Cinder at the troupe massacre, his sword is out.
And that sword is weird.
It’s pale and elegant, and Kvothe describes it in terms of winter ice. Even the sound of it is compared to the quiet of the coldest winter days.
Cinder/Ferule’s sign?
“Ferule chill and dark of eye.”
Then we see Cinder again in the Eld.
No obvious supernatural cold.
And, importantly, we don’t see him use that sword.
That made me wonder whether Cinder isn’t actually suppressing his sign at all.
Maybe the sign simply isn’t active because the sword isn’t.
Seven swords?
So I started looking at Shehyn’s list again:
Cyphus bears the blue flame.
Stercus is in thrall of iron.
Ferule chill and dark of eye.
Usnea lives in nothing but decay.
Grey Dalcenti never speaks.
Pale Alenta brings the blight.
Last there is the lord of seven:
Hated. Hopeless. Sleepless. Sane.
Alaxel bears the shadow’s hame.
I’ve always assumed these were basically curses attached to seven people.
But what if they’re descriptions of what their swords do?
And if these swords are ancient — potentially Creation War ancient — maybe they weren’t forged in anything like the normal sense.
Maybe they were Shaped.
Not necessarily swords literally made from lumps of glass, blood, water etc.
I’m thinking more along the lines of a Shaper taking the underlying properties of two things and combining them into something new.
So I started working backwards from each sign. And this is where things got slightly ridiculous.
Cyphus’s sword — Shaped from FIRE + STONE
“Cyphus bears the blue flame.”
The obvious starting point is fire.
But why blue fire?
Copper compounds can produce blue/blue-green flame.
And copper comes from stone/ore.
So perhaps stone is the underlying principle, while copper is the particular physical expression of it.
Fire + copper-bearing stone gives us the blue flame.
Which wouldn’t be terribly exciting on its own…
Except there’s a Taborlin story involving Scyphus.
Scyphus captures Taborlin and takes his staff and sword. When Taborlin gets his things back, Marten specifically describes the sword as:
his copper sword, Skyaldrin
Dedan even interrupts him to argue that Taborlin’s sword wasn’t copper.
So Rothfuss has deliberately put:
Scyphus + a copper sword into the same story.
And Shehyn gives us: Cyphus + blue flame.
I’m NOT saying Skyaldrin secretly belongs to Cyphus. The story explicitly calls it Taborlin’s.
But these stories have been passed down for thousands of years. Maybe the Taborlin story has preserved a fragment of something much older.
There are also old stories of ever-burning lamps.
Maybe somewhere underneath all these different stories is the memory of an ancient weapon that burns with blue flame.
Stercus’s sword — Shaped from STONE + BLOOD
“Stercus is in thrall of iron.”
Everyone seems to jump from iron to rust.
But rust isn’t really an iron power.
Rust is decay.
And we already have:
“Usnea lives in nothing but decay.”
So I don’t think Stercus is the one rusting everything.
I think thrall is the important word.
What do we know in these books that attracts iron? A loden-stone.
Kvothe spends enough time learning about them that we’re very clearly told what they do: they pull on iron.
So perhaps Stercus’s sword has been Shaped with the property of a loden-stone.
But thrall doesn’t just mean attraction.
It means being under someone’s power. Enslaved. Enthralled.
And then I started thinking about blood.
Blood contains iron.
No, I’m not suggesting you could stick someone to a fridge magnet because there’s iron in their haemoglobin 😂
I’m thinking in terms of the magic of this world. Blood is repeatedly treated as an incredibly powerful link to a person.
So perhaps: loden-stone → iron → blood → attraction → enthrallment.
The physical effect is attraction of iron.
The living effect is attraction/control of people.
Which could potentially explain some of the old stories about madness and strange behaviour around the Chandrian.
And then I realised Aleph describes the angels as having:
wings of stone and blood
Exactly the pairing I’d just arrived at.
Which was mildly irritating 😂
Ferule/Cinder’s sword — Shaped from GLASS + WATER
This is the one we actually get to SEE.
Cinder’s sword doesn’t read like an ordinary metal sword at all.
Everything about it is pale, cold, smooth, wintery and almost ice-like. Even the sound it makes is described through the strange quiet of a bitterly cold winter day.
So:
GLASS + WATER = ICE
Not necessarily literally a glass sword with water sloshing around inside it 😂
I’m thinking Shaping — taking two underlying principles and bringing them together to create something new.
The sword isn’t necessarily made from ordinary glass and water. It has been Shaped from the properties of both.
Glass gives us something pale, hard, smooth and crystalline.
Water gives us ice/cold.
Result: Ferule chill and dark of eye.
And again, this is the one sword we actually see.
At the troupe massacre:
sword out → cold/quiet imagery everywhere.
In the Eld:
no strange sword → no obvious supernatural cold.
That’s what started this whole stupid rabbit hole.
Usnea’s sword — Shaped from WATER + AIR
“Usnea lives in nothing but decay.”
Initially I was trying to involve time here, but that felt far too vague.
What actually causes things to decay naturally?
Water + air.
Moisture and oxygen.
Iron corrodes.
Wood rots.
Stone and brick weather and crumble.
Which is interesting because the old Chandrian stories seem confused about whether these are different signs:
rusted metal, rotting wood, crumbling masonry.
Maybe they’re all manifestations of decay.
That would also mean:
“When your bright sword turns to rust…”doesn’t necessarily describe Stercus just because Stercus mentions iron.
It could be the result of Usnea’s sword acting on somebody else’s weapon.
Grey Dalcenti’s sword — Shaped from AIR + GLASS
“Grey Dalcenti never speaks.”
Initially I couldn’t make this one work at all.
Then I thought about what silence actually requires.
Sound travels through air.
Remove the air and sound cannot travel.
Mirror-glass can create a sealed boundary.
So perhaps Dalcenti’s sword has been Shaped to create some sort of absence or control of air around it.
AIR + GLASS → SILENCE
And there is actually a Creation War clue for the air part.
When Lanre binds Selitos he commands the air and lays it “leaden” on Selitos’ tongue.
He uses air to prevent Selitos speaking.
That seems rather relevant to: Grey Dalcenti never speaks.
Maybe Dalcenti isn’t simply a bloke who doesn’t talk.
Maybe silence is the sign.
Pale Alenta’s sword — Shaped from BLOOD + SHADOW
This is probably the weakest one at the moment, so feel free to tear it apart.
“Pale Alenta brings the blight.”
Blight affects living things. People, animals, crops.
So blood seems like the obvious underlying principle for life.
Then shadow.
Living things deprived of light wither and die. Plants especially.
Extend that through Shaping to blood/life and perhaps you get sickness, infertility, crop failure, blight.
I’m not married to this one.
Alaxel/Haliax’s sword — Shaped from SHADOW + FIRE
“Alaxel bears the shadow’s hame.”
Shadow is obviously the easy half.
Fire is repeatedly associated with Lanre/Haliax — Myr Tariniel is burned, and we repeatedly encounter Haliax surrounded by fire and destruction while remaining impossibly cloaked in shadow.
But the main reason I kept this combination is Aleph again.
The angels are described as having: wings of fire and shadow
Again, that’s an exact pair Rothfuss has already put together.
And then I noticed the bloody pattern…
I hadn’t started with seven materials and tried to assign them.
I’d been trying to work backwards from the signs.
But when I wrote them all down:
Cyphus’s sword = FIRE + STONE
Stercus’s sword = STONE + BLOOD
Alenta’s sword = BLOOD + SHADOW
Alaxel’s sword = SHADOW + FIRE
They form a closed loop:
FIRE → STONE → BLOOD → SHADOW → FIRE
Then:
Ferule’s sword = GLASS + WATER
Usnea’s sword = WATER + AIR
Dalcenti’s sword = AIR + GLASS
Another closed loop:
GLASS → WATER → AIR → GLASS
And every single root appears exactly twice.
Fire twice.
Stone twice.
Blood twice.
Shadow twice.
Glass twice.
Water twice.
Air twice.
That’s the point where I stopped thinking I was just assigning random things to them 😂
Especially because Aleph already gives us:
fire + shadow and stone + blood as exact pairs.
His other pairing is iron + glass, which I haven’t quite worked out yet.
But clearly these sorts of pairings existed around the time of the Creation War.
And if these swords were Shaped during that period, that suddenly seems quite important.
But why swords?
Cinder is the obvious reason.
We physically see his sword, and Rothfuss spends an unusual amount of time describing it.
But there’s another enormous section of WMF devoted to something that always felt slightly… excessive.
The Adem sword room. We get ancient swords. Names. Histories. Owners going back thousands of years.
Kvothe is given Caesura, but the Adem don’t really treat the relationship as:
Kvothe owns this sword.
The sword existed before Kvothe.
It has its own name, history, and line of bearers.
Kvothe is just the latest person attached to it.
And that reminded me horribly of the Yllish knots.
When Kvothe is learning Yllish, he struggles with the fact that possession can work both ways.
It isn’t simply: the Chancellor’s socks.
The grammar can imply something much stranger — almost as though: the socks own the Chancellor.
The relationship goes both directions.
Now look at Shehyn’s wording again.
“Cyphus bears the blue flame.”
“Alaxel bears the shadow’s hame.”
Maybe the distinction matters. Maybe the Chandrian don’t simply own these swords. Maybe they bear them.
The sword belongs to the Chandrian. But in another sense…the Chandrian belongs to the sword.
The person is temporary. The weapon persists.
Exactly like the Adem swords and their long lists of bearers.
Which raises another horrible possibility I’m not going down yet 😂
Maybe names like Ferule aren’t simply the names of the people.
Maybe they belong to the weapon/role as much as the person carrying it.
And then there’s Taborlin
Taborlin has his own collection of ancient magical tools:
sword
staff
cloak
candle
amulet
coin
key.
And some of these seem to echo the Seven strangely.
Haliax literally bears a shadow’s hame — a covering/cloak.
Cyphus bears blue flame — candle/fire.
Stercus and the loden-stone/amulet idea potentially overlap.
Dalcenti and the staff may connect if the staff is a means of controlling or commanding power.
But the one that really bothers me is the sword.
In Marten’s story, Scyphus captures Taborlin and takes his staff and sword.
When Taborlin gets it back, Marten specifically calls it:
his copper sword, Skyaldrin
Dedan actually interrupts to dispute the fact that Taborlin’s sword was copper.
Again, the sword belongs to Taborlin in the story. I’m not trying to quietly give it to Scyphus.
But we’ve now got an ancient story that deliberately places:
Scyphus + copper sword together.
And Shehyn gives us: Cyphus + blue flame.
Copper compounds can produce blue/blue-green flame.
Which is an awfully strange detail to preserve in that particular story.
Maybe Taborlin’s seven magical tools preserve distorted memories of these ancient weapons.
Maybe they’re completely separate.
Or maybe Taborlin’s tools were actually designed to counter the Seven swords.
I haven’t worked that bit out yet.
And finally… the Watchers
This is probably my favourite part.
At Kvothe’s troupe massacre, the Chandrian are sitting around with their signs everywhere.
Cinder’s strange sword is out. Then suddenly Haliax notices something. They look upward. They come.
And they disappear.
But when we see Cinder in the Eld, he’s successfully hiding.
No obvious supernatural cold. No strange sword being used. Then Marten starts praying.
He calls Tehlu, Ordal and Andan.
Cinder suddenly looks towards the sky. Then legs it.
We know the angels/Watchers can apparently be called properly.
So what if there’s another way of calling them?
Using the swords. Sword is activated. The two principles it was Shaped from manifest. The Chandrian sign appears.
And that sign acts like a beacon.
The Watchers can find them.
That would explain why the Chandrian have spent thousands of years learning how to hide their signs.
Maybe “hiding the signs” isn’t actually suppressing a curse that’s permanently leaking out of them.
Maybe most of the time they simply don’t draw/use the swords that create the signs.
At the troupe massacre they do. The Watchers come.
In the Eld Cinder doesn’t. Marten calls the Watchers anyway. Cinder runs.
What about the Mauthen farm?
This was the first thing I tried to use to destroy the theory.
There are signs everywhere after the Chandrian have left. Rotten wood. Rusted metal. Blue flame. But that doesn’t necessarily break it.
If Usnea’s sword causes accelerated decay and then she puts it away, the wood doesn’t magically become new again.
If iron rusts, it stays rusted.
If Cyphus’s weapon burns something, it stays burned. The active sign stops.
The physical damage remains.
And we never actually witness the end of the Mauthen massacre.
We don’t know why the Chandrian left. We don’t know whether something came.
So…
Maybe I’ve completely lost the plot 😂
But I can’t quite get rid of this now.
Cinder’s sword seems to physically resemble his sign.
Cinder displays the sign when we see the sword out and apparently doesn’t when he’s hiding in the Eld.
The Seven can somehow hide their signs.
The Adem spend an enormous amount of the second book teaching Kvothe — and us — that ancient swords have names, histories and bearers.
Yllish grammar explicitly screws around with which side of an ownership relationship actually possesses the other.
Shehyn describes the Chandrian as bearing things.
The seven signs can be modelled as swords Shaped from pairs of underlying principles.
Those pairs unexpectedly form two closed loops in which every root occurs exactly twice.
Two of those exact pairs — stone/blood and fire/shadow — already appear in Aleph’s description of the angels.
Taborlin has seven ancient magical tools, including a copper sword in the story of Scyphus.
And whenever the Chandrian seem to realise the Watchers are coming, they look to the sky and disappear.
So my current ridiculous theory is:
The Chandrian signs aren’t passive curses.
They are the effects produced by seven ancient Shaped swords, each formed from two fundamental principles.
The Chandrian don’t simply own those swords. They bear them — and perhaps, in the Yllish sense, the ownership goes both ways.
Drawing/using the swords manifests the signs.
And manifesting those signs may be what allows the Watchers to find them.
Which might explain why the Chandrian are so bloody careful about hiding them.
Anyway.
I’ve been down this rabbit hole for far too long now.
Please destroy it before I find another one 😂 I will maybe put a summary in the comments again