r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 27d ago

Meme needing explanation Petahhhhhhhhh!??!?

Post image
74.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

20.1k

u/NwgrdrXI 27d ago

Everyone is saying gay sex and all that, but honestly... is ye really asking if it is possible to spend 20 years without sex? Is thst really so preposterous? I think a lot of people in reddit could and have done it?

39

u/A_Snow_Mexican 27d ago

How so many just jumped straight to gay is hilarious. Maybe a few but a whole damn boat? Personally I'm taking the 20 years of celibacy and maybe get tricked by a Siren.

57

u/DeltaVZerda 27d ago

They're ancient Greeks, it would have been weird if they didn't do the gay sex.

25

u/Dave_A480 27d ago

Except for the lack of boys on the crew to serve as partners.....

39

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

11

u/pandareno 27d ago

I realize this is Rome and not Greece, but I'll never forget the scene in Caligula when he first rapes the bride and then the soldier who's just married her.

15

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

5

u/pandareno 27d ago

I mean, it is a movie, made by Penthouse no less. I didn't mean to imply it was historically accurate, my bad.

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

2

u/arestheblue 26d ago

Based on your downvote, I'm going to guess someone got really offended by other people not wanting to live in a post-truth world.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Dr_Occo_Nobi 27d ago

Ah, back when the historians were also active politicians.

1

u/tommos 27d ago

And then the watermelon in the fruit basket he gave them as a wedding gift.

2

u/i_am_a_real_boy__ 27d ago

I'm not sure Alex would say he had peers.

1

u/DeltaVZerda 27d ago

Only Diogenes

1

u/i_am_a_real_boy__ 26d ago

Now there's a guy who certainly wouldn't have a problem taking care of business in a crowded boat.

1

u/CitizenT777 26d ago

I'm having a hard time imagining the conversation prior to such acts- "hey Buddy, come over here for a minute, need a quick favor". LOL. I had read, as someone else mentioned, that society looked down upon the guys on the receiving end of things, but that would have to be at least half of the people involved (when it's consensual). How would they view the teenage boys forced into it - some kind of twisted double standard? So many questions.....

2

u/bobbiroxxisahoe 26d ago

They didn't look down on "queer" relationships. In some places it was normal for units to be built around the couples because they fought harder for each other. As for the pedo shit, it would have been slaves and "teaching them how to be men" as the reasoning. This was an era of marrying younger people in general and it's not exclusive to men or boys.

Being queer or having queer relationships is not related to what happened with kids in that era. The two are separate topics and each worthy of hours of study, since "Greek" or "Roman" society is a bit of a misnomer. Sparta, Athens, Rome, Egypt, they all had different customs but broadly speaking they were more and less accepting then societies now, in different ways.

1

u/Tay74 26d ago

Being the receiving partner was usually seen as demeaning, especially if you weren't a young boy. People overly flatten and simplify Greek views on homosexuality as though they were hyper woke and had no weird prejudices going on, they had prejudices, they were just more focused on who was penetrating vs being penetrated, the former was fine regardless of who you were sticking your dick into

1

u/bobbiroxxisahoe 26d ago

It's not that simple, but yes you can use usually here, but I think it's unfair and perhaps reductionist to unify and simplify a culture that was actually many different cultures and had a length of 250-500 years or so of relevant history. this is a nice overview and you can read by making an account at your local library to login.

1

u/Tentaculo94 27d ago

Gay sex was more accepted in Greece than other cultures but not a majority as well, and mostly in Atheens. It was vastly pederasty between an adult and a teenager (not always romantic or sexual though). More of that being active was fine but the passive one not socially good looking.

2

u/Sensitive-Sample-948 26d ago

In ancient Greece, it's only gay if they're the one getting bottomed - and it's actually seen as humiliating. They're incredibly patriarchal and don't want to be "used like a woman".

1

u/DeltaVZerda 26d ago

I'm no ancient historian but this sounds Roman to me

1

u/A_Snow_Mexican 27d ago

I'm aware that it was socially acceptable. To have gay sex one is usually gay. So you're saying 100 percent of Greek males were at least Bisexual? Quite the fantasy.

7

u/DeltaVZerda 27d ago

Those labels just aren't applicable to ancient Greeks. Gay and Bisexual are modern concepts.

5

u/eyadGamingExtreme 27d ago

Not having a word to describe a phenomenon does not mean the phenomenon didn't exist

3

u/Madara1389 27d ago

But what if the historical record suggests that the "phenomenon" is caring about the gender of the person playing with your genitals or even associating sex with romantic attraction, rather than being an activity that's just fun to do and helps build strong sentimental bonds between people?

2

u/Neuchacho 27d ago edited 27d ago

The fantasy is thinking a culture historically famous for its man-on-man sex was not, in fact, having man-on-man sex. It was absolutely the norm for dudes to be fucking other dudes. It was treated as a sort of youthful phase for them.

Then there's the whole pederasty bit...

That's all to say that it's absolutely not out of the question that you'd have a boat of 20 guys who were all down to clown. There would be no real stigma or issue attached to doing so so why not?