MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoursTea/comments/1w4gp0d/whats_in_a_name_a_lot_actually/p77udeu/?context=3
r/PoursTea • u/Fast_Adhesiveness528 • 5h ago
55 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-9
The treaty doesn't establish the name of the lake, it simply mentions the lake.
The lake being mentioned in a historical document does not mean that the lake can't have its name changed.
This is a very stupid argument.
5 u/KactusVAXT 4h ago So you think George Washington was wrong? What part of America are you trying to make great again? -2 u/BIayneRobinson 4h ago edited 4h ago I'm Canadian; OPs argument is just stupid. And wtf do you mean "you think George Washington was wrong?". Do you think I'm saying that when the treaty mentioned Lake Ontario it was wrong?? 😂 I can't even figure out wtf you're asking. 2 u/KactusVAXT 4h ago Your IP address isn’t Canadian……
5
So you think George Washington was wrong? What part of America are you trying to make great again?
-2 u/BIayneRobinson 4h ago edited 4h ago I'm Canadian; OPs argument is just stupid. And wtf do you mean "you think George Washington was wrong?". Do you think I'm saying that when the treaty mentioned Lake Ontario it was wrong?? 😂 I can't even figure out wtf you're asking. 2 u/KactusVAXT 4h ago Your IP address isn’t Canadian……
-2
I'm Canadian; OPs argument is just stupid.
And wtf do you mean "you think George Washington was wrong?".
Do you think I'm saying that when the treaty mentioned Lake Ontario it was wrong?? 😂
I can't even figure out wtf you're asking.
2 u/KactusVAXT 4h ago Your IP address isn’t Canadian……
2
Your IP address isn’t Canadian……
-9
u/BIayneRobinson 4h ago
The treaty doesn't establish the name of the lake, it simply mentions the lake.
The lake being mentioned in a historical document does not mean that the lake can't have its name changed.
This is a very stupid argument.