r/PoursTea 4h ago

PoliticalTea šŸ—³ļø What's in a Name? A Lot Actually!

Post image
286 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

32

u/MosquitoValentine_ 3h ago

The Great Lakes came from indigenous tribes. It wasn't named after the Canadian province, but these morons wouldn't know that would they...

17

u/no_kids-and-3_money 3h ago

The last step in genocide: erasing the memory of the people that used to live here by changing the names of things.

5

u/PhatCatTax 2h ago

Well... on the upside, most nations that start electing incredibly corrupt people collapse within a few decades. So... in that sense, the new government that forms from the ashes might rename all the things we have renamed, and night choose to revert it all.

1

u/no_kids-and-3_money 31m ago

Yeah, and this is open corruption of the highest degree.

13

u/hugoriffic 4h ago

Does anyone think Trump or his sycophantic administration care?

7

u/sweatboxy 3h ago

Or the companies like Google that are anxious to please him in return for mercy.

2

u/Idaho-Earthquake 2h ago

4

u/sweatboxy 2h ago

Trump’s presidency has ā€˜radicalized’ me. Seeing the billionaires, the corrupt corporations, the corrupt institutions kowtow to Trump has convinced me that they are primary threats to democracy and must be contained if freedom is to survive. I never thought anything like that until Trump revealed it.

2

u/EitherChannel4874 1h ago

The only divide that matters now is rich vs non rich.

6

u/Character-Newt-9571 3h ago

Tell Google.

11

u/KactusVAXT 3h ago

What’s Google?

FYI…..Mapquest isn’t bending the knee

6

u/jigga1383 3h ago

Tell that to the bootlicker running Google. Cunts, all those involved.. Trump, google, the entire Trump administration.

3

u/sub-dave 3h ago

Are you say Trump is wrong 🫢

3

u/ThelIIusion0fSeIf 3h ago

Trump literally doesn't understand how anything works. LITERALLY ANYTHING. Give me one audio/video clip of him speaking intelligently on any topic without any teleprompting and I'll delete my account. Trump thinks his role as POTUS is to do whatever he wants unilaterally through EOs because he doesn't understand how the legislative process is supposed to work.

2

u/Own-Scallion-8713 4h ago

What was the quip he made about someone having intelligence? We need a suit brought up by a lawyer ASAP. They can get this overturned.

2

u/No-Koala1918 3h ago

Maybe Google AI missed that. More likely, Google Trumpsuckers just went with their non-existent backbone

2

u/AshamedAd4240 2h ago

Incorrect he can legally change the name it just wont be recognized internationally https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/08/28/trump-lake-ontario-lake-america-explainer/91505554007/

1

u/Technical_Jury7673 2h ago

Canada should sue for 20 billion.

1

u/DripBaylessNYK 1h ago

Its not going to be changed. The end

1

u/EitherChannel4874 1h ago

He can override and did because still no one is challenging him in any way. America has allowed him to do whatever he wants. If you guys don't like it then do something or enjoy your rapist leader.

1

u/LostExile7555 43m ago

You'd think he'd love the name "Ontario" for a lake because it means "The Big, Beautiful Lake."

1

u/Rand-all 25m ago

Processing img d0p3dw4qtymh1...

1

u/anyodan8675 14m ago

He can't spell that. Stop being so mean to the elderly.

1

u/TR_Pix 3h ago

Documents are just ink on paper. If Trump convinces enough people to ignore it, they will

0

u/Individual_Check_442 2h ago

Not that I’m defending Trump but did the 1795 treaty actually say it could never be renamed?

0

u/BIayneRobinson 2h ago

No, it doesn't.

It simply mentions the lake and OP thinks that if a place's name is mentioned in a treaty that it can never be changed.

-15

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago

The name of a place being mentioned in a historical document doesnt mean it cannot be changed.

This is like saying that because Istanbul was called Constantinople in some Roman document it can't be called Istanbul today.

It's a silly argument.

He changed the name of the lake in all official US documentation going forward, of course he can't change the past.

11

u/OldNeeds 3h ago

There’s a lawful process. He doesn’t believe in process, nor does he follow it. He’s not a king, he needs to bring this before lawmakers to lawfully change the name. His signature comes after that.

10

u/no_kids-and-3_money 3h ago edited 3h ago

Completely missed the entire point of what they were talking about?

-9

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago

What was their point if not "Lake Ontario was mentioned in a treaty, therefore the name cannot be changed"?

6

u/no_kids-and-3_money 3h ago

Their point is that a Senate ratified treaty can NEVER be overridden by an executive order. It is becomes ā€œthe supreme law of the landā€.

-7

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago

The treaty doesn't establish the name of the lake, it simply mentions the lake.

The lake being mentioned in a historical document does not mean that the lake can't have its name changed.

This is a very stupid argument.

5

u/no_kids-and-3_money 3h ago

I don’t care what you think is a stupid argument. Take a civics lesson or something.

It cannot legally override or erase historical names set by sovereign Indigenous treaties or international agreements.

3

u/KactusVAXT 3h ago

So you think George Washington was wrong? What part of America are you trying to make great again?

-3

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago edited 3h ago

I'm Canadian; OPs argument is just stupid.

And wtf do you mean "you think George Washington was wrong?".

Do you think I'm saying that when the treaty mentioned Lake Ontario it was wrong?? šŸ˜‚

I can't even figure out wtf you're asking.

2

u/KactusVAXT 3h ago

Your IP address isn’t Canadian……

-1

u/BIayneRobinson 2h ago

u/KactusVAXT

Yes it is.
Nice try tho.

2

u/Fast_Adhesiveness528 3h ago

Ever think that a treaty between adjacent nations is more than a simple "historical" document? It's an agreement that is intended to have an enduring legal effect (at least until Diaper Donnie decides to wipe his arse with it). And the treaty uses Lake Ontario to identify the boundaries of the sovereignty of the respective signators.

Because the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty and George Washington signed it, the agreement remains the supreme law of the land under the U.S. Constitution (see previous clause relating to whether the Constitution is an enduring legal document).

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/six1794.asp

-3

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago

The names of places can be changed without breaking a treaty that mentions the name of the place.

Your idea that because Lake Ontario is named in a treaty that the name cannot be changed is very very stupid.

4

u/Fast_Adhesiveness528 3h ago

The first rule of Dunning-Kruger Club is you don’t know you’re a member of Dunning-Kruger Club.

Please tell the class where you obtained your law degree.

-2

u/BIayneRobinson 3h ago

Said the dunce who thinks that if a place is mentioned in a treaty, it can NEVER have its name changed 🤣

3

u/Fast_Adhesiveness528 2h ago

Now ... about that law degree of yours? Trump U? YouTube U?

-1

u/BIayneRobinson 2h ago

You're saying you have a law degree? šŸ˜‚

Which school taught you that "if a place is mentioned in a treaty, that name can NEVER be changed"? 🄓