Thereās a lawful process. He doesnāt believe in process, nor does he follow it. Heās not a king, he needs to bring this before lawmakers to lawfully change the name. His signature comes after that.
Ever think that a treaty between adjacent nations is more than a simple "historical" document? It's an agreement that is intended to have an enduring legal effect (at least until Diaper Donnie decides to wipe his arse with it). And the treaty uses Lake Ontario to identify the boundaries of the sovereignty of the respective signators.
Because the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty and George Washington signed it, the agreement remains the supreme law of the land under the U.S. Constitution (see previous clause relating to whether the Constitution is an enduring legal document).
-15
u/BIayneRobinson 5h ago
The name of a place being mentioned in a historical document doesnt mean it cannot be changed.
This is like saying that because Istanbul was called Constantinople in some Roman document it can't be called Istanbul today.
It's a silly argument.
He changed the name of the lake in all official US documentation going forward, of course he can't change the past.