Capitalism is "inshitifying" itself exponentially because it has been completely divorced from Democracy (and common sense) for a looong time. Everything you hate about the bourocracy of private insurance, the subscriptions for media platforms, every disgusting monetization scheme you've been seen in a videogame, all of this and more is coming to occupy every aspect of modern "Capitalism" (aka: Dystopic Corpocracy // Techno Feudalism ala Blade Runner)

More basic services becoming apps, more devices refusing to work if they're not connected to internet, more subscriptions and paywalls and "ultra super mega premium" bs to milk you out of every single penny you have left. The want EVERYTHING to use money to function, otherwise it doesnt.

"If it can't be Monetized it shall not exist" is the motto, because being rich is a Psychopathy and the more you have the more you need to take away from the rest. You are either highly interested in the survival of Humanity and your own, or you support Capitalism. No in-between.

I hope this is allowed, first time poster in this subreddit

This awful person is John Morgan of the Morgan and Morgan law firm.

Think about all this technology and the enormous amount of money to implement these systems in their 10,900 stores. They have the money to pay people better, they just know they don't have to and nobody is forcing them to. In the US we taxpayers have to foot the bill for their employees healthcare, SNAP and other government programs because they pay so little. Minimum wage was supposed to be a livable wage. Paying such a paltry wage should be illegal.

( and yeah, the spying is super creepy and should be illegal also )

I've been thinking about this primarily from an environmental standpoint.

If a job can reasonably be performed remotely, why should an employer be able to require an employee to commute to an office simply because management prefers physical attendance?

I'm not suggesting that every job should be remote, or even that employers could never require someone to come in. Obviously there are jobs that require physical presence, and even normally remote-capable jobs sometimes have legitimate reasons for employees to be onsite.

What I'd like to see is something closer to a legal right to remote work where reasonably practicable. An employee could request remote work, and if their normal duties can be performed remotely, the employer would need an actual business justification for denying it rather than simply saying "company policy."

This seems particularly reasonable when an employee has already demonstrated that they can successfully perform the same job remotely.

We spend enormous amounts of money and energy moving people back and forth every day. Commuting creates emissions, traffic congestion, road wear, accidents, fuel consumption, parking demand, and hours of unpaid travel time. For a job that genuinely requires someone to be somewhere, those costs may be unavoidable. For someone who spends eight hours working on a laptop and talking on Teams, they're largely self-imposed.

Remote work isn't environmentally free either. Homes still need electricity and HVAC, people make other trips, and there are legitimate arguments about productivity and collaboration. So I'm not suggesting this would somehow solve climate change.

But after COVID demonstrated on a massive scale that many jobs can be performed remotely, it seems strange that whether millions of people need to commute remains almost entirely an employer preference.

If a job can demonstrably be done remotely, shouldn't the burden be on the employer to explain why physical attendance is necessary?