r/careeradvice • u/Coach-Emmanuel • 5h ago
Stopped replying to messages after 6pm for two months straight. My manager just told HR I've "really grown" this quarter.
For about a year and a half I answered everything the second it came in, didn't matter if it was 7pm or a Sunday. Figured that's what being reliable looked like, and for a while it seemed to work, I got the good projects, got asked to sit in on calls I technically didn't need to be on.
Then I got skipped for a lead role in March. Went to someone with less tenure who, from what I could tell, mostly just left on time and didn't say much in meetings.
I didn't quit or make a scene about it, just quietly stopped doing the after-hours thing. Turned off notifications at 6, left anything that came in overnight until the next morning unless it was actually urgent, which almost nothing ever was.
Nothing happened for the first few weeks. Genuinely thought I'd made things worse, kept expecting someone to say something.
Then in this quarter's check-in my manager mentioned to HR, in front of me, that I'd "really grown" in how I manage my workload and that I seem a lot more in control this year. Same output as before, honestly probably less total hours, just less visible scrambling.
Not posting this as a brag, more just confused about how "answering everything immediately" read as chaotic instead of dedicated, and "answering during work hours only" reads as competence. Feels backwards from what I was taught early on.
TLDR: stopped answering messages outside work hours, got told I "grew" this quarter despite doing less total time, not more.