well "A racist is a person who believes that some human races are better or more intelligent than others, or someone who treats people unfairly because of their race "
the first part of the definition, if you believe statistically, you are therefore believing that some human races are more intelligent than others so you are a racist by definition if you believe that, and prob most people won't prove it otherwise. you are seen by nuts and bolts as a racist.
In theory if you say it non-judgmental as a statistic fact, that would only prove you are not a racist under some circumstances for e.g: you are a scientist or work with statistics in any domain, and it serves as a aproxis of what you are studying or it's contextually dependent; even if you are not studying formally, you maybe are self-studying for knowledge, even if you believe that fact, culturally and morally you are seen as inferior to people who believe otherwise. It's a contradiction in a nutshell, what is this term called psychologically, there must be some philosophical terms for this that I am unaware
tbh i am tired of having these types of conversations and my low decision making today due to sleeping only 2 hours serves as a contradiction to my certainty of this type of reasoning being valid. tbh some might say that being morally superior is different than having higher iq for example, but higher iq already predisposes some aspects of morality in general, it's also correlational. some might cope that it's not causal, but in this specific case there is not a factor underlying that is making it only correlational
it's like I am trying to defend the reason why I defend a moral basis to disregard an unsupported moral cultural stupid adaptation that society had. Yes I don't believe that higher iq is simply higher morality in it's absolute sense because there are dumber people that act more morally justified than others. (exceptions, although they don't defy the argument because the hypothesis is more for means)Higher iq is correlational between less sensitive compared with lower iq, so in a sense higher iq doesn't have as much morality in that regard. But it doesn't take 2 foreheads to see the difference between a chimpanze and a human, evaluating each from their own intelligence. So blacks, niggers, negroes, whatever, judging that they are lower iq, I would estimate there is a higher chance of them acting culturally less morally than other groups, sure socioeconomic factors play also a role, specially since intelligence is not the sole explanation for different morality. Although I would still believe that higher iq, the easier it is to not act like a dumb ass, either being intellectually but also being more correct on other affairs. i mean if it was emotional behavior shaping morality, chimpanzes would have that, but they don't as much as humans. so intelligence plays a bigger role, at least cognitive morality