As of today, I've had 3 different Sony Trinitrons and countless CRTs from other manufacturers. Quite frankly, I don't find Trinitrons to be at all what they're hyped up to be. I've had the following 3 models: KV-27S42 (Used the most), KV-19TS20 and KV-27FS12. I'll start out with the oldest of the three, the KV-19TS20. I know at least one of you is about to say "that's a composite only set, not a fair comparison". However, that isn't my point. This trinitron was actually the only one I was impressed with. It has quite a good picture for only having composite, and especially for a TV released in 1989. Enter the KV-27S42, a CRT introduced nearly a decade later. I got rid of my Toshiba 20AF43 before getting this thinking I was upgrading to one of the best possible consumer TVs. After all the 20AF43 is an Orion made Toshiba. I was real disappointed once I hooked everything up over S-Video, the same as I was using with the Toshiba. The AF series picture seemed much more clean looking to me. That being said, I still gave the Trinitron the benefit of the doubt considering there's a difference in pixel density between 20 inches, and 27. Since then, the KV-27S42 quit powering on (don't worry, I listed it for free on my local fb marketplace, I was told by the buyer that it has now been repaired). Pretty recently, I actually did get pretty lucky and got a JVC I'art AV-27F475 for free. It was in need of a cord replacement, and some magnets placed on the tube to fix some purity issues, but it does work. I find this TV to be even better than the Toshiba AF, giving a very clean picture with even better colors than any TV I've had prior. The next day I got lucky again finding a Panasonic Tau PV-DF2703 for $1, albiet with its internal dvd/vcr combo having issues. I also think this Tau looks better than the Trinitrons, albiet only marginally. Today I found a Trinitron KV-27FS12. I picked it up thinking perhaps Sony improved their TVs in the 2000s, but I was wrong. I find this CRT to be just as unimpressive as the KV27S42. It has some rainbowing issues around the corners, but the tube is still okay enough to get a general idea of its picture quality. I'll be giving it away for free since it's not going to be replacing either my I'art or Tau, even though I could probably fix it if I felt like it. I just don't understand why so many people hype these up as being the best consumer CRT you can possibly get. I frequently see these CRTs for $200-500, which I don't find justifiable when JVCs, Toshibas, and especially Panasonics can be found for much lower prices. I know this is definitely a hot take, but I feel like someone out there needs to hear it before dropping $350 on a trinitron just because its "the best".