r/dji • u/pier1807 • 5h ago
Product Support DJI Support asks a DECEASED cancer patient for "explicit authorization" to unlock a drone. Ticket 10391284
Hello everyone, and hello to the DJI community administrators.
I am writing this post to express my deep frustration with the rigid, insensitive, and utterly tone-deaf conduct enforced by DJI’s customer service policies, which create impassable automatic barriers even when dealing with extreme, sensitive, and deeply delicate cases.
Here are the facts:
A few months ago, the tenant living in my apartment, Mr. E***** B*****, unfortunately passed away. Before his departure, he signed an official, binding legal agreement releasing the apartment and, consequently, all personal property left inside it to me—including his DJI Mini 2. Under Italian property law, the physical possession of a non-registered movable asset, combined with legal documentation tracing its origin, constitutes undisputed proof of legitimate ownership. I am now the sole and rightful legal owner of this drone.
However, the drone is currently bound via Account Binding to the deceased owner’s profile ([r******@gmail.com](mailto:robbar51@gmail.com)). Since he has passed away, there is absolutely no way to access his account directly or request a password reset through his devices—neither for me nor for his relatives (whom I would never dream of disturbing for such a trivial matter during their time of grief).
As soon as I became aware of DJI's anti-theft system (a measure I completely respect and agree with in normal circumstances), I contacted DJI Support under Ticket 10391284, confidently providing:
- The signed legal agreement releasing the property and its contents.
- The exact credentials linked to the deceased (email, as well as his Italian and US T-Mobile phone numbers).
- Clear photos of the drone and its serial number (3Q4CHBE3B39EKT).
- Full availability to provide his official death certificate, confirming he passed away on March 19, 2026, due to a malignant neoplasm of the descending colon, treated in vain with a stoma.
Given that the original owner passed away after a long, painful, and agonizing medical battle, the first shocking response I received from DJI Support (agent AJ) was a generic script:
"We cannot directly unbind the device from an account without explicit authorization from the original account holder. This security measure is in place to prevent unauthorized transfers and safeguard everyone's equipment."
The second response was even more inappropriate and morally unacceptable to me:
"Unfortunately, the previous owner's heir will need to contact us directly for verification. We recommend that family members access their email account and send us an unbinding request from that email address."
These requests are a Kafkaesque nightmare. The first is a physical impossibility. The second is an incredibly insensitive, invasive, and inappropriate demand to place upon a family that has just been devastated by a tragic loss after such a brutal illness.
While I fully support the fight against theft and illegal appropriation, DJI's stubborn refusal to recognize the exceptional nature of this case goes far beyond security. By hiding behind automated scripts and refusing to manually unbind a legally acquired asset, DJI is actively preventing the free use of private property.
I am objectively the legitimate owner of this asset. I am publicly asking for a human being—a supervisor or a senior administrator—to step in personally, look at the legal documents attached to my ticket, and handle this case with a shred of common sense.
Please escalate Ticket 10391284 to a senior manager who possesses a minimum of human empathy.
Thank you