Good jerkers borrow from other jerkers. Great jerkers steal outright.
So let it be with alignment charts.
Thanks to the amazing u/Camellia980, we have been graced with the knowledge of whom we felt fits a standard alignment chart.
But we’re not standard.
We’re sloopies.
Thus I have taken it upon myself to generate a more individualized alignment chart, with some helpful theft of a joke from u/RemingtonRivers. (Note: I also spent way too long finding the exact goddamn shades from the sub banner and matching them in the Updated Alignment Chart. The boxes for our winners are the color of Alchemized’s pages (and currently filled with about as much meaning and quality.)
For the rows, we have {Helpful, Sloopy, Chaos Gremlin1}.
For the columns, we have {Literate, Sloopy, Stupid}.
Similar to before, nomination rounds will be open for approximately at least two days. Different than before: there will be a “row” round, where I will put all of the nominations in at the same time, because I like removing interfering variables whenever possible.2
Other things, like how many winners we have, have yet to be decided.
So let’s have some fun! Who do we think are the members of RCJ to represent Sloopy Helpful?
Thought of someone for Literate Helpful? There’s still time, because Sloopy Science is fluid, just like the morals of our main characters.
Snarky Footnotes (as required by the Gods of Science)
1 Punk was not right. Troll was not right. Punk-ass-bitch was not right. But then the lamentation and accusation posts for our currently-AWOL and SWOL Numbers began, and I understood the true extremes of the spectrum.
2 Example of the "row" round.
- Day 1: Literate Helpful nominations open
- Day 3: Sloopy Helpful nominations open
- Day 5: Stupid Helpful nominations open
- Day 7: "Row" Round, where Literate Helpful, Sloopy Helpful, and Stupid Helpful are comments in a post, and every single nominee is added as a sub-comment to their respective group. That way, everyone can vote on all nominees at once and late nominations are not unfairly penalized.
/uj take two because my poor sloopy brain has been fried by writing up an explanation of why BookTok leads to crappy books having good ratings that I can turn in to my PhD seminar instructor. My apologies to the early nominators.