This is something I notice whenever the debate over banning pro russian propagandist pop up, there's always someone saying they're just saying a different opinion, when if one is repeating words for words the kremlin narrative, no it's not just a different opinion, it is helping russia colonizing ukraine and justifying it , in the case of federova per example, she wasn't just criticizing ukraine in good faith, she was a pro russian propagandist . Also, I don't think freedom of speech automatically mean it's ok to disinform other without being at least contradicted, if one want to interview lavrov , then provide a counter point of view, not just his.

“Euromaidan was a Nazi coup by the west” “Putin is holding back and could level Ukraine if he wanted to” “America is the only imperialist in the world” “The people in the Donbas chose to fight back against the Nazis in Kyiv“

Keep telling yourselves that Tankies, maybe one day you‘ll will it into existence

Okay but seriously, how delusional can you get, whenever I want to lose brain cells when looking at takes on Ukraine I always go to that subreddit and it’s a 100% success rate

Beside them believing russia propaganda, it feels more like some european politician also enabled putin or had a good relation with him (chirac in france per example or sarkozy converting to being pro russia and germany also has its share of pro russian politician), france and germany were also opposed to ukraine and georgia joining nato so if nato goal was to expand to russia borders like pro putin claim then nato could've done it sooner and before crimea got annexed too . I also find the "boris ended peace negociation" take weird because why would ukrainian keep negociating after they discovered bucha per example or russia kept demanding too much.