If that numbers mean all men are violent I have a surprise for you, since you love generalizations so much. Which race commits the majority of violent crimes?
Nice try, but this is an ideological war, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those guys think that the women generalization made by Sean is bad and incorrect but the men generalization made by them is good and correct.
Well if we're gonna talk about violence we might as well talk about the most violent conflict of our collective history and who caused that.
I'd honestly say "common criminality" is nothing compared to violence of the scale of either world war.
Its so funny dealing with you pathetic racists, you're all happy to talk about violence until we bring in the big numbers and suddenly that dont count. You'd never want to discuss the frequent wars involving Europe or NA because I guess that doesn't count as violent tendencies to you. Heads up btw war crimes, are violent crimes so wars should count for what you're talking about.
First of all Africa currently accounts for roughly 40% of the world's active armed conflicts and wars. Secondly, soldiers act as agents of a recognized government, they don't choose to inflict violence. They aren't a good example of 'violent tendencies'. The vast majority of those soldiers never commited a violent crime before and after the war.
Its quite literally nothing next to the figures other regions have put up throughout history. We literally got so good at killing each other that we can now no longer fight directly cos we have bombs capable of ending civilasation as we know it.
they don't choose to inflict violence.
My bad, I guess all soldiers should expect forgiveness for the civillians they enable the killing of. Guess all those Iraq kids who were blown up in hospitals were victims of a violence that nobody chose. These things just happen I guess.
I honestly can't believe you're so desperate as to violence in war don't count. You're either dumber than I thought or incredibly pathetic.
Well, to be fair, feminist blame all men for the action of some men. So its the same thing, just in the opposite side. Its like, extremes are bad. But for the last 14 years, saying that would get you socially ostracized.
A jury is supposed to be to some extent a representative sample, so if hypothetically 9/9 women all had the same verdict, it’s not unfair to draw generalizations. Not that I agree with his conclusions.
Sure, both sides participate in jury selection, so a jury is not a perfectly representative sample. But that doesn’t reduce it to merely “some women” in the same sense as pointing to "some men" who, for example, beat their wives. Jurors are still drawn from the broader population through a process intended to produce a cross-section of the community. So if, hypothetically, 9/9 women on a jury all reached the same verdict while the men did not, it would be strange to say that this is not at least some evidence of a broader gender-related pattern.
I get what you’re saying, but I’m not sure I reach the same theoretical conclusion. I would expect women to relate to and understand female-oriented issues (PPD, for example) more than men. I’m not sure that should be characterized as a negative or in any way other than it’s a logical outcome. It’s a feature of any form of diversity (a positive one), that people come from different circumstances and understand things in a varied way based on their life, race, gender, etc. People jumping to the women are more emotional or less rational are being ignorant of more logical explanations for what may appear to be a gender-divided-issue.
Sure, if you make all the necessary assumptions to support reaching that conclusion. Which is part of the issue, since alternative assumptions would perfectly support the initial premise. So I guess it’s important to self-reflect on why you’ve jumped to your assumptions, what that says about your world view, and what is the source of your preconceived biases.
I’m not sure what assumptions or what conclusion you are referring to. You yourself just said that women may reach a different conclusion because their experiences and perspective as women lead them to understand the issue differently. I'm not inherently placing a positive or negative value on that. Just that if there is a clear gender divide in a verdict, this seems to be evidence of some kind of pattern that is not necessarily limited to these 9 women. The statement "He blames all women for the actions of some women but never all men for the actions of some men" seems pretty disingenuous in this context.
55
u/migglywiggly69 4h ago
He blames all women for the actions of some women but never all men for the actions of some men