r/ufc • u/infinitehelpmaster • 2h ago
Sean Strickland's latest post on twitter
[removed] — view removed post
39
u/igotitnowokay 2h ago
There is a possibility that she gets out of a mental ward in 20 years and lives a normal life hidden away from society
→ More replies (3)•
591
u/InvisibleHook 2h ago
The women that are understanding or blaming the man are demonic. Plain evil and should be avoided.
266
141
u/AnnArchist 2h ago
The man lost his wife and 3 children and somehow he is subjected to some of the most severe online bullying I've ever seen.
Anyone blaming Patrick is truly evil.
→ More replies (12)18
26
u/Riv3rJordan 1h ago
I’ve seen him being called negligent and he needed to help more. Mind you he was helping by picking up medication for the kid and dinner for the family. Because she asked him to. So she could murder the kids. And somehow people think he was the problem and not the mom who murdered the kids. You can not win with some people
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (61)37
u/SemperSalam 1h ago
The same thing happened during the Carmelo Anthony murder trial. You had a lot of black people claiming his innocence and blaming the victim. Now we have white women defending a x3 child murderer. Something is wrong here.
•
u/onwisconsin1 27m ago
In today's media environment and the lack of centralized local socializing, this is going to happen. People get into their echo chambers, no one pushes back, and people come out of the echo chamber with extreme views.
Its important to note this happens with men and white people too. Peoples view of events are colored by their identity and need to belong to a group. No human is exempt from having their worst biases reinforced by an echo chamber. You are on reddit after all.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Latter_Antelope_6524 37m ago
Yea, 15 witnesses and eventually a video wasn’t enough to get people to stop parroting “them white boys was jumping him!”
92
u/pureformality 2h ago
Can someone explain? English isn't my native language
114
u/DietSimple 1h ago
This is about Lindsay Clancy. She is a woman who strangled her 3 children to death and tried to commit suicide (but failed) afterwards. Her husband was not home at the time.
Sean Strickland is implying with his tweet that this should be an easy and simple decision for the jury. Since the jury is still deliberating and appears to be in deadlock, the females on the jury (according to Sean) must be extremely biased. Obviously, nobody outside the jury knows what's going on behind deliberation room doors. They are locked and soundproofed for a reason. For all we know, the men could be siding with the defense. We don't know the thought process behind any of the jurors.
Nobody is denying the what, how, and when of this tragedy. Even her own defense and supporters agree she did it. It's whether she was legally responsible or not. The divide is whether this woman was sane enough during the event (guilty of premeditated murder) or having some sort of postpartum psychosis break (not guilty by reason of insanity).
Jurors are still deliberating and currently in a deadlock so mistrial is likely. Judge will obviously try to resolve the deadlock before declaring mistrial. Mistrials do not mean the defendant goes home free. The ball is left in the prosecution's court - they have to decide whether to retry the case w/ a new jury (double jeopardy does not apply after mistrial), offer plea bargain or drop the charges completely.
→ More replies (8)56
u/graipape 1h ago
Whoa buddy. Enough with these rational, fact-based responses. Go touch some grass.
8
u/DietSimple 1h ago
My dog's looking at me like "I agree with his statement".
Fine *grabs the leash*.
•
u/MagnusNewtonBernouli 22m ago
"Hey. Why don't you take your calm demeanor and your sound logic and get the FUCK out of my hate thread?"
319
u/Original-League-6094 2h ago
A woman strangled her three young children to death with exercise bands. Women on Tiktok made this into some sort of fight for women's maternal rights, and now the jury appears to be deadlocked, meaning this will most likely be a mistrial.
→ More replies (13)168
u/goongoblin113xc 2h ago
Wait are u serious she’s not going to prison most likely ??? Holy shit
114
u/A_Town_Called_Malus 2h ago edited 2h ago
She is looking for a verdict of not guilty for reasons of insanity. She is going to be in a mental institution until she no longer poses a threat to herself or others, even if she does succeed in that defence.
15
34
u/apirateship 2h ago
So, now?
No more kids to kill
25
u/A_Town_Called_Malus 2h ago
No, until the doctors at whatever institution she would be committed to are satisfied that she is properly treated and no longer at risk of psychotic episodes.
41
u/StewDD 1h ago
Most doctors will not risk their license or reputation by releasing a person found not guilty by reason of insanity. For the most part, it's considered a life sentence.
5
u/red286 1h ago
On July 30th, 2008, Vincent Li stabbed and killed Tim McClean on a Greyhound bus from Edmonton to Winnipeg in Canada. He then proceeded to decapitate Tim, display his head to people outside the bus, and cut off other portions of his body and eat them before the police showed up and arrested him.
In the trial that followed, it was determined that Vincent Li was not criminally responsible due to having undiagnosed schizophrenia (apparently people just assumed he was a very devout Christian convert when he told people that Jesus spoke to him). He was remanded to a mental institution in 2009.
By 2012 (3 years later), he was allowed to take supervised trips into the nearby town. By 2014 (5 years later) he was allowed to take unsupervised trips into the nearby town. By 2015 (6 years later) he was allowed to take unsupervised day trips to Winnipeg so long as he kept a cell phone on him at all times. By 2016 (7 years later) he was allowed to live independently outside of the prison. In 2017, 8 years after being committed, he was given a full non-conditional discharge, with no legal obligations or responsibilities above and beyond those of any other citizen.
•
u/Great-Trifle2810 7m ago
While I am usually pretty quick to be critical of the Canadian justice system this seems reasonable. He was determined to have committed the crime as the result of a psychotic episode, doctors determined the issue was resolved, slowly reintegrated him into society and he has not committed any crimes since.
This seems better than the alternative of locking up a now healthy person for decades at the expense of the tax payer.
→ More replies (1)11
→ More replies (1)•
u/BedbugBandido 54m ago
I know it was Canada, but after those doctors released the guy who decapitated and cannibalized that dude on that bus, nothing would surprise me.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)11
→ More replies (9)•
u/Big_Tap_1561 45m ago
There was a lady that was interviewed outside the trial and she said “I want for her to be found not guilty so she has a chance to start a family and have the peace she deserves”
https://giphy.com/gifs/W0c3xcZ3F1d0EYYb0f3
4
u/SpeakerAppropriate10 2h ago
What are you looking at the jury is still deliberating from what I’ve seen
2
u/BorisTheBlade04 1h ago
Judge told them to keep deliberating after they announced they didn’t reach a unanimous decision
→ More replies (23)2
18
u/NotAThrowAway0822 2h ago
Wait are u serious she’s not going to prison most likely ??? Holy shit
There is no world in which this woman lives a free life. Stop being dramatic... holy shit...
The "debate" is whether she belongs in prison or a mental institution. There is a lot of evidence pointing to her mental struggles over the years, which misinformed people seem to not address.
Again, there is no world in which this person lives a free life.
→ More replies (1)•
u/jfsoaig345 19m ago
Which isn't even unreasonable
Prison is meant to deter and rehabilitate. If it's true that she is genuinely and severely mentally afflicted, then prison wouldn't do anything. You can't deter behavior that wasn't 100% unintentional, but you can still protect the public from her by holding her in a mental institution.
3
u/Cheese_Fisticuffs1 1h ago
No, because even if it were a mistrial the prosecution would just re-present.
3
u/PipsqueakPilot 1h ago
The jury is most likely debating whether she should go to prison or a high security psychiatric hospital. Basically is she guilty, or not-guilty by reason of insanity. Both are effectively a sentence of confinement for the rest of her life.
→ More replies (10)19
2h ago edited 2h ago
[deleted]
35
u/willydillydoo 2h ago
There’s also the possibility she’s released quickly within a couple of years.
There was also hundreds of people outside the courtroom to support her, calling it bot accounts is not accurate
8
u/ShackletonsVael 2h ago
In Canada a guy cut someone's head off and ate parts of it and they let him change his name and released him after a few years.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)3
u/Bozhark 2h ago
No they are correct.
Those real people are the result.
Outside China, Tiktok is a tool for de-education and social destruction
→ More replies (1)38
16
10
u/cascadesblue 2h ago
Hundreds of women literally showed up in person protesting shes innocent and should be released... pathetic how you try to write off women justifying murder as bot accounts when Hundreds of women in the media have already spoken for her.
9
u/Augustus_Chevismo 2h ago
Her being found not guilty and 3 little kids not receiving justice is very infuriating
3
u/ComfortableDish3912 2h ago
Are the crowds of women supporting her in person and glazing her lawyer bots? Gtfo
→ More replies (1)5
u/apirateship 2h ago
And if she goes to the mental institution she may be released in as little as 18 months.
→ More replies (9)6
u/WilliamSabato 2h ago
I hate this ‘its all bots’ horseshit lol. People love saying that to try and minimize something negative.
There are literally tens of thousands of commenters who are not bots supporting her and blaming the husband.
5
u/Grand-Jellyfish24 1h ago
Some kind of crime is happening that is way too mediatized and way too many personalities and people that have no business giving their opinion are involved out of boredom. And that includes the women on TikTok and Strickland.
I would advise ignoring the topic and the people talking about it like their lives depend on it. It is just brain rot for the masses. People trying to defend a conviction make the situation even more complicated in this case.
→ More replies (8)•
u/MazzleMaze 22m ago
Since others are leaving this part out... The reason people are supporting her is because she tried multiple times to seek help. Instead of taking her seriously she was brushed off.
The reason people are taking her side is because this was completely avoidable if she was taken seriously.
The court case isn't about if she killed her kids. Its about if she planned it or had a mental issue.
136
u/michaelfrieze 2h ago edited 2h ago
Men or Women shouldn't be allowed to vote. I can find examples of both men and women having bad opinions, so voting is over. The enlightenment was a failure.
Only I am capable of deciding what is best for our country.
19
→ More replies (4)7
289
u/Available_Dot_935 2h ago edited 2h ago
EDIT: Framing a woman entirely as a passive victim of her hormones or postpartum biology strips away the concept of adult female autonomy.
By reducing her actions to medical helplessness, the defense inadvertently relies on old, patriarchal tropes... making Lindsay Clancy defenders, ironically, the ultimate anti-feminists.
9
u/Wajubop12 1h ago
There is a specific medical question at issue that is central to approximately 1% of felony cases. That is whether her condition rendered her incapable of comprehending the wrongfulness of her action at the time she carried it out. Extrapolating massive societal implications from this one criminal trial signifies a lack of seriousness about understanding the justice system.
→ More replies (1)66
u/T35tTest678 2h ago
Men handle stress so much better than women... which is why men are 9-10 times more likely to kill their partner after a breakup than women are.
19
u/DomitiusAhenobarbus_ 1h ago
And men commit 95% of sex crimes against children. Demonstrating wonderful impulse control
•
u/Tim_thatporscheguy 30m ago
And I think the average sex offender doesn't have a whole slew of fans. In fact they're often killed in jail.
It's almost like regardless of who commits the crime, the vast majority of the population despises them.
But Lindsay Clancy has MOTHERS defending her
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)7
40
u/sweeneytodd126 2h ago
you kid but if you've seen enough videos of cops in high stress situations over the last few years it's clear who handles stress better (and also, who is more aggressive)
43
u/T35tTest678 2h ago
I think men are less likely to feel fear or anxiety than women, on average.
But they are more likely to feel anger and become violent, on average.
So men are more emotional in some ways, women are more emotional on other ways.
→ More replies (3)21
u/UrethraFranklin72 2h ago
Have to disagree there. I think women are just as likely if not more likely to get angry and act on it, men just have much more capacity for violence as the more physically dominant sex.
→ More replies (3)19
u/GoodLadLopes 2h ago
This is pretty obvious I don’t even think it needs to be said, but clearly it does.
Women are just as crazy as men, men are just, on average, capable of doing a lot more damage which makes things uglier a lot quicker and more often, not by willingness to do so, but by ability to do so.
8
u/wallabypolicy 1h ago
You kid but most police shootings are committed by dudes that look like Sean Strickland and I'd appreciate it if you can prove me wrong
→ More replies (2)3
u/zokka_son_of_zokka 1h ago
Yeah, but all cops are shit at handling stress, regardless of gender.
→ More replies (1)7
u/ReduxRedo 1h ago
"If you saw the videos that the algorithm curates for me because it knows I don't like women, you'd understand 😏"
→ More replies (2)7
u/Fug1x 2h ago
like when the cop lady who thought she was using a taser but shot the man lol
or the cop women who tried to take a gun out of a mans holster and shot him with his own gun haha
→ More replies (3)3
u/sweeneytodd126 2h ago
two classics. Have you seen the one where a lady cop (looks to be in south america maybe) is showing off her gun to a woman and she shoots her?
→ More replies (3)2
u/Moldy-Bongwater4420 1h ago
Maybe we’re just better at it than women are? We’re more successful at suicide, too.
→ More replies (18)15
u/Slushees 2h ago
Men also do the most stressful and deadly jobs in the world by an absolute mile.
Whataboutism’s aren’t helpful
→ More replies (18)3
u/pearflavoured 1h ago
then don’t use an example of the rare case a woman kills someone to prove that women can’t handle stress
•
u/OwlNo6346 59m ago
Woman can’t kill people as easily. Golden and Labrador retrievers have a higher kill count than chihuahuas. Does that mean they are more aggressive? Of course not. Chi’s can’t kill problem
→ More replies (3)7
u/McRawffles 1h ago
Men in 2026: Sex trafficker Andrew Tate should go free. Be ALPHA
People just be dumb as shit in general
→ More replies (1)2
7
u/DomitiusAhenobarbus_ 1h ago
I’m not even sure what point you’re trying to make we all know the bitch should go to jail. What the fuck does that have to do with voting? Are we really fucking stupid enough to think tens of millions of women shouldn’t be able to vote because of a TikTok famous case?
There are literally people who have been convicted by juries of men and then executed by the state only for it to be discovered years later they didn’t do it. Do you have any idea how many criminal cases go to jury trial per year in the US?
7
u/pearflavoured 2h ago
most people who kill their family members are men wtf are u talking about
→ More replies (4)21
u/ShackletonsVael 2h ago
Where are all the GoFundMes for those men? Where are all the men standing outside protesting their innocence and saying they understand why they did what they did? Some guy just killed 8 of his family members recently, where are the GoFundMes for them?
→ More replies (19)3
u/Banda7 1h ago
Men in political power were celebrating the life and actions of a convicted genocidal war criminal who died last week
→ More replies (5)•
u/minivatreni 31m ago
She had postpartum psychosis and it’s documented that women can kill their children during it. Without proper treatment yes you completely fall victim to it, the same way men do when they are under psychosis.
Either way the screenshot you posted it worded purposefully to undermine the gravity of the situation. Its not the Aha moment you think it is
→ More replies (8)•
u/Obatala_ 52m ago
If you figure out a way that someone can control PSYCHOSIS you will win a Nobel Prize!
83
u/AngryAssyrian 2h ago
It's absolutely insane that they still haven't reached a verdict on this case when this is the clearest case of first degree murder. It boggles my mind that there are people defending this child murderer just because she's a woman, she's literally the female version of Chris Benoit.
21
u/Chanandler_Bonggg 2h ago
Even worse, she’s capable of contentment after her actions. Benoit took his own life because he wouldn’t have been able to live with what he did to his family.
→ More replies (2)7
u/2litrebottle22 2h ago
Benoit also had the brain of an 80+ year old with alzheimers due to all the head injuries
→ More replies (13)32
u/BPKofficial 2h ago
she's literally the female version of Chris Benoit
That's exactly what my girlfriend said, and I strongly agree.
6
u/Intrepid_Boat 1h ago
People are missing a crucial point. She has admitted from the beginning that she did it. It’s not like she just walks free if found “not guilty.” She will either spend the rest of her life in prison, or in a secure mental hospital. Truly, they should have come to some kind of agreement for a plea deal.
3
u/WeekUseful 1h ago
my main point against that is it was premeditated she didnt just snap and kill her kids she had it planned out when her husband be back and how long it would take it be one thing if she just snapped and didnt know what she was doing she knew it was wrong and went through with it anyway those kids are dead becouse of her she has mental health issues i agree but she planned it she doesnt deserve any softer treatment becouse of that she had control over her actions she actively planned to kill her kids
→ More replies (2)
18
u/ReduxRedo 1h ago
The degree to which UFC fighters have their opinions taken seriously is really, really strange to me.
4
u/Emotional_Amoeba5405 1h ago
Fr if the cte idiots were posting fight tips fine but why anyone gives a fuck about whatever else they say is beyond me to understand
→ More replies (4)2
54
u/migglywiggly69 2h ago
He blames all women for the actions of some women but never all men for the actions of some men
→ More replies (9)32
u/ProfessionalStable81 2h ago
Which is even more insane considering 90% of all violent crime is committed by men, and 95% of sex crimes are committed by men.
→ More replies (22)
30
39
u/T35tTest678 2h ago
Strickland says this as if male jurors haven't also made stupid decisions throughout history...
→ More replies (2)
67
u/No-Tone-6853 2h ago
Mfs don’t understand she’s not getting away with anything and will be in prison or a mental health facility for the rest of her life.
58
u/CompetitiveInhibitor 2h ago
NGRI doesn’t guarantee permanent commitment in most states.
12
u/T35tTest678 2h ago edited 2h ago
In the case of killing many children it should
11
→ More replies (1)9
13
u/Conscious-Source-438 2h ago
The judge made it clear to the Jury that the shortest commitment he'd seen on the bench was 8 years and the longest was committed at 19 and was still committed at 80.
Given that's she's currently in a mental health facility on a 1:1 suicide watch I'd reckon she's not going anywhere anytime soon
14
u/apirateship 2h ago
And what's the shortest time legally required?
40 days.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Conscious-Source-438 1h ago
Okay the minimum sentence for manslaughter in Massachusetts is 2.5 years I'll assume thats not long enough for you either.
Is it the concept of spending the majority of the rest of her life in a mental facility really that troubling to you? Going to bed with that mental picture of bars in front of her face that important?
Because I hate to break it to you, she'd still be in a mental facility even if she's convicted because she's on suicide watch and the state of Massachusetts has those prisoners at state mental health facilities.
→ More replies (1)4
7
u/cascadesblue 2h ago
8 yrs for literally murdering your own 3 kids is a time out. Absolutely disgusting how patheticly women are excusing her behavior cause ah stressed
→ More replies (4)6
u/Conscious-Source-438 2h ago
I understand you feel that she should be punished, facts be damned but this is how our legal system works.
No one but the most extreme TINY minority is excusing her behavior.
The real condition of postpartum psychosis MIGHT explain her actions but I don't know if a full panel of board certified psychologists would even agree whether she was or wasn't experiencing a psychotic episode.
9
u/Alternative_Plan_823 2h ago
That's not true. Not guilty by reason of insanity is on the line. Andrea Yates, the woman who drowned her 5 kids and is often compared to this one, is free to go and only remains in a nice little facility because she chooses to. Look it up.
12
u/ximstuckx 2h ago
It’s not guaranteed permanent commitment. After you are committed you are assessed after 6 months and if you are recommitted you get reassessed every year after that.
2
u/Chimpucated 2h ago
And once you are assessed competent the criminal sentencing term can begin. It's so rare for anyone to be guilty but insane to be freed.
In reality what happens is they get committed for 6 months or a few years, and then once they are "fixed" they get moved to prison.
3
u/ximstuckx 2h ago
As far as I understand you can’t fave charges again because of no double jeopardy and you were found not guilty
→ More replies (3)18
u/Empty_Occasion_963 2h ago
Shes a baby killer, she should get the needle
2
u/Irish_Jam_Bag 1h ago
What about all of these child rapists that are running your government, shouldn't they get the needle too?
8
→ More replies (4)5
→ More replies (3)4
30
u/Forsaken-Swim-3055 2h ago
I came in here expecting the dumbest takes from this dim MMA fanbase, and I have not been disappointed.
→ More replies (4)
14
u/WatchDecent2822 2h ago
The man is a moron...but that woman is definitely guilty of killing her kids and no amount of mental mumbo jumbo should spare her a life sentence. Let her get all the therapy she needs doing life without parole.
→ More replies (3)
35
u/kb2328 2h ago
Is he dumb enough to think that she's trying to get off? The trial is for if she gets life in prison or life in a psych facility. She's not arguing if she did it haha. Sean is legit dumb as rocks.
12
u/lost_boy505 2h ago
They don't even acknowledge that mentally ill people who commit crimes are regularly sentenced to psychiatric wards instead of prison and if rehabilitated at a later date they are moved to a regular prison.
This country is cooked. Low iq goons are the majority.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (23)5
u/Alternative_Plan_823 2h ago
That's not true. Not guilty by reason of insanity is on the line. Andrea Yates, the woman who drowned her 5 kids and is often compared to this one, is free to go and only remains in a nice little facility because she chooses to. Look it up.
→ More replies (7)
11
•
u/grumpy_herbivore 46m ago
Its hard to imagine a shitter or dumber person than Sean.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/ContentCantaloupe992 2h ago edited 2h ago
Sean has a very limited view of the law
→ More replies (1)3
6
u/MeenaarDiemenZuid 2h ago
It's kinda funny to see this play out because in the Netherlands and a lot of other European countries, this is the norm.
→ More replies (3)2
u/welpWW3isgonnasuck 1h ago
Its the norm here as well. The question is pretty much does she belong in an institution (she's already in one) or prison. She admitted to killing the kids but the postpartum psychosis doesnt put her in sound mind to have the knowledge component of commiting the crime. Not guilty by reason of insanity can very much still result in indefinite confinement in a mental institution.
49
u/GolfOscarYankee69 2h ago
If Clancy gets acquitted, it’d be the feminist equivalent of OJ. I’d seriously consider the 19th amendment a mistake given how much support she’s getting.
27
u/brybrymma 2h ago
If she gets a not guilty verdict she’ll be sent to a mental hospital. The case isn’t about if she did it or not it’s about if she wasn’t mentally sound or not when she did the murders. I think she should be found guilty.
18
u/Jujuju1741 2h ago
A lot of people are misunderstanding what the trial is about. She did it and admits to that. Its whether she goes to a mental institution or prison essentially. I think prison but that just my opinion.
6
u/GolfOscarYankee69 2h ago
It’s an insanity plea. She already got convicted for murder. All the evidence suggests she premeditated this murder. She was of sound enough mind. Lock her up. Preferable fry her.
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (1)3
u/Frosty_Purple_7341 2h ago
For like a month since all experts have now said she’s sane and no longer psychotic and also no longer suicidal. isn’t that funny how everything she claimed to be dealing with mysteriously disappeared right after brutally strangling her kids to death and has never popped back up since
→ More replies (2)22
u/MrJakked 2h ago
Acquittal isnt on the table. The question is whether she is guilty, or not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI).
An NGRI finding sends her to a mental facility until she is deemed to have been treated, no longer s threat to society, and the mental facilities discretion (essentially) that she is no longer mentally ill.
In essence, NGRI is a life sentence for which you are eligible for parole, and which is served at a mental hospital rather than a prison (theres a but more nuance to it, but thays the gist).
I cannot overstate that no one (excepting, perhaps, a handful of actual crazies on ticktock) is advocating for her aquittal or innocence; the majority "supporting" position is that she should be treated/confined to a mental hospital, rather than being sent to prison, which is consistent with decades of law (that no one cared about previously) where someone suffering from acute psychosis kills during a psychotic episode, and is found NGRI.
Again: no one is hoping for an aquittal. Additionally, to be clear, you are free to think than an NGRI finding is inappropriate based on either, or both, policy reasons (e.g., NGRI shouldnt exist) or factual reasons (e.g., you don't believe she was actually psychotic). But its imperative to understand that no one (again excepting some ticktock crazies) is saying she should be aquitted.
9
u/TylertheDouche 2h ago
Again: no one is hoping for an aquittal.
a lot of people think the trial is a conspiracy and the husband is the killer
→ More replies (1)4
u/Soft_Database_3747 1h ago
I havent seen one, you need to delete whatever feeds push thst to you
There will always be extremists. People think the earth is flat still, and crazier.
→ More replies (9)3
u/Abaddon-117 1h ago
Just look up “Leos don’t kill their cubs” on TikTok, and see how many people don’t think she did it due to stuff like astrology signs
3
u/MrJakked 1h ago
Well your first mistake was downloading ticktock lol. For the rest, im just going to copy/paste my other comment, brother:
"A handful of dipshits on social media claim to believe that, but it is by no means "a lot," even if you believe that every single person posting it is sincere in their claims (which I doubt, personally).
You'll feel better if you dont let algorithmic biases convince you that the most extreme and asinine positions taken by fringe members of various groups, are representative of the actual opinions held by group constituents."
Ticktock isnt reality, my man, and the algorithm pushes the most insane takes to drive engagement. I promise you that is not actually a widely held position.
11
u/TylertheDouche 2h ago
are you following the trial? there’s no acquittal option lol. she did it. they are determining her mental state when she did it.
→ More replies (2)13
u/Chimpucated 2h ago
Following your logic... You reconsidering black men being able to vote because of the OJ verdict? She's not getting as much support as you lunatics think she is. She's getting typically mass media manipulation treatment. A fringe group of women get their voices amplified because it's a red hot culture war distraction just in time for the midterms. Even the radicalized women are being manipulated to amplify the issue.
→ More replies (12)7
u/lost_boy505 2h ago
Lmao you are extremely unintelligent if you think one bad jury ruling would nullify the legitimacy of the 19th amendment.
I hope for your own sake you are a bot.
→ More replies (9)2
→ More replies (6)2
46
u/HurricaneIan25 2h ago
Woman here who had PPD. He’s right. 🤷♀️
68
u/ClearSightss 2h ago
You agree that you shouldn’t be able to vote or be on a jury…?
→ More replies (1)16
9
30
u/AbberageRedditor69 2h ago
She (apparently) had post partum psychosis, much different
Still, it doesn't absolve her at all
→ More replies (16)15
u/pearflavoured 2h ago
why do most of the people talking about this case not even know that the defense is not blaming PPD they’re blaming psychosis
36
u/shnn_twt 2h ago
You're such a pick me it's embarrassing. "Yeah! I shouldn't have basic civil rights!" holy fuck.
10
→ More replies (13)•
7
u/ohmarino 2h ago
Men can also be mentally ill enough to idolize serial killers what does sean think about that?
→ More replies (4)2
u/Mlem7991 2h ago
Yeah cant believe people idolize ted bundy, jeffrey dahmer and wade wilson serial killer
→ More replies (1)
27
12
u/fowlflamingo 2h ago
Tell me you have no idea how our justice system works without telling me. Just because social media has determined guilt beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean shit in a court of law.
People who talk like this shouldn't be able to serve on a jury, quite frankly. Take a fucking civics class
→ More replies (9)
2
2
u/Harshkang69 1h ago
If she was insane at the time then it’s a not guilty by insanity and off to the looney bin right?
→ More replies (1)
3
1
2
u/Emotional_Amoeba5405 1h ago
I find the people generalizing about all women based off this one case to be hypocritical and performing the same thing as the ‘all men’ crowd. Verdict of my little court room
→ More replies (1)
•
u/Vivid-Course-7331 58m ago
You know, we don’t need to repost every thing he tweets about. If I wanted to see that, I’d follow him.
•
u/Long-Region5088 58m ago
You think he feels the same way about rape victims or do they suspiciously get a pass from him?
→ More replies (2)
•
u/DunderMifflin-C-Team 20m ago
Sounds like the average Reddit user who didn’t follow the mountain of evidence behind the husband but just hates women.
•
u/Hard_Celery 18m ago
Why is everyone acting like insanity defense is some new thing and it only applies to women or something.
If don't think that should be a legal option that's your opinion, but I don't know why it's being turned into some gendered thing.
5
u/oran12390 2h ago
Vast oversimplication of things. It's not about her feelings, she had a mental health problem, was actively seeking treatment, and still did this. She deserves some empathy for what she did, but that doesn't absolve her of what she did. Some of the conspiracy shit is stupid but the prosecution saying she was of sound mind is misguided. IMO Psych ward for the rest of her life is reasonable.
→ More replies (5)
20
u/Matty_D47 2h ago
Is it necessary to post every single one of Sean Splitland rage baiting, shit takes?
19
u/realwavyjones 2h ago
You think this is a shit take? 😬 🤦🏼♂️
27
u/HyperactivePandah 2h ago
You think women shouldn't be allowed to be on a jury or vote because the people on THIS jury think the defendent is too insane to do anything but be placed in a mental institution forever?
→ More replies (6)43
u/Draws32 2h ago
Yeah? Using a generalization to take away voting rights is objectively unintelligent.
17
→ More replies (9)21
u/Square_Button_7061 2h ago
Woah slow down there, these incels can’t read above a 3rd grade level so you’re just confusing them
2
19
u/Matty_D47 2h ago
That women shouldn't vote or be able to serve on a jury? I get he's the king of you incels but grow the fuck up.
→ More replies (12)15
u/TheAngriestPoster Pervert eye happy, but your soul sad 2h ago edited 2h ago
The idea that only women shouldn’t be on a jury is a shit take when men also do stupid shit. Which is what he said in his first sentence
I don’t know how anyone could browse a place like this and come to the conclusion that men don’t think or do stupid shit
→ More replies (22)→ More replies (32)2
u/SuperSuperGloo 2h ago
do u support the mother?
→ More replies (5)26
u/PipedInFromIthaca 2h ago
You gotta be retarded to go from "this woman committed murder" to "women shouldn't vote".
→ More replies (2)8
u/HyperactivePandah 2h ago
You gotta be retarded to think that the jury is saying anything but 'She's literally too crazy to have been able to commit murder, and should be in an institution forever.' and not 'WOMEN WANT TO LET HER OFF!'
And also what you said.
Just wild.
4
2
•
u/Sensitive_World7780 46m ago
I love him lol and he’s not wrong. I’m a woman and can’t believe women are this fucking dumb
→ More replies (1)
4
u/OwlActive3449 2h ago
Love how strickland triggers all the feminized cucked redditors
→ More replies (13)
433
u/BigBrotherBoot 2h ago
The UFC sub is PEAK debate. Truly the best our society has to offer in terms of raw cognition.